Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law (2)
- Arts and Humanities (1)
- Courts (1)
- Environmental Law (1)
- French and Francophone Language and Literature (1)
-
- French and Francophone Literature (1)
- German Language and Literature (1)
- German Literature (1)
- Health Law and Policy (1)
- Immigration Law (1)
- Judges (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (1)
- Military, War, and Peace (1)
- Modern Literature (1)
- Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law (1)
- State and Local Government Law (1)
- Institution
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
The Dialogue Of Absence, Richard Stamelman
The Dialogue Of Absence, Richard Stamelman
Studies in 20th & 21st Century Literature
The Dialogue of Absence
Shouting Incitement In The Courtroom: An Evolving Theory Of Civil Liability Comment., Michael P. Kopech
Shouting Incitement In The Courtroom: An Evolving Theory Of Civil Liability Comment., Michael P. Kopech
St. Mary's Law Journal
Civil incitement is an evolving theory, intended to ascribe liability to a publisher. Civil incitement charges that the contents of a publication proximately caused the plaintiff’s physical injury, thus holding publishers civilly liable for the physical consequences of their communications. However, the validity of civil incitement as an actionable tort clashes with the principles of freedom of speech and press embodied within the First Amendment. Incitement, as a successful cause of action, demands following the standards set out in Brandenburg v. Ohio. Prior attempts to hold publishers civilly liable for the physical consequences of their communications have rarely survived motions …
Many Silent Worlds, Martha Minow
Communication In The Ninth Circuit: A Concern For Collegiality, Stephen L. Wasby
Communication In The Ninth Circuit: A Concern For Collegiality, Stephen L. Wasby
Seattle University Law Review
After a discussion of the court's basic organization, the general stages of consideration of a case will be briefly described. Then attention will be focused on communication between the judges about cases. Cases before screening panels will be discussed first. Then cases set for argument before three-judge panels will be examined beginning with pre-argument communication, extending through exchanges at argument, the postargument conference, and the post-conference period. This will be followed by discussion of communication leading to the call for an en banc court. Communication among judges chosen for an en banc court will be considered next along with intracircuit …