Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (10)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (6)
- Criminal Law (6)
- Criminal Procedure (6)
- Supreme Court of the United States (6)
-
- Law and Race (4)
- Evidence (3)
- Law and Politics (3)
- State and Local Government Law (3)
- Business Organizations Law (2)
- Fourteenth Amendment (2)
- Immigration Law (2)
- Jurisprudence (2)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (2)
- Law and Society (2)
- Securities Law (2)
- Sexuality and the Law (2)
- Administrative Law (1)
- Animal Law (1)
- Banking and Finance Law (1)
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (1)
- Education Law (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Fourth Amendment (1)
- Housing Law (1)
- Human Rights Law (1)
- International Law (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Keyword
-
- Supreme Court (4)
- Discrimination (2)
- Shareholder (2)
- Sixth Amendment (2)
- 2016 presidential election (1)
-
- ADR (1)
- ASEAN (1)
- ASEAN Way (1)
- Alternative Dispute Resolution (1)
- Animal Cruelty (1)
- Association of Southeast Asian Nations (1)
- Basis of sex (1)
- Bivens (1)
- Border Patrol (1)
- Buck v. Davis (1)
- Business (1)
- Byrd v. United States (1)
- California Assembly Bill 420 (1)
- California Education Code (1)
- Caremark (1)
- Carpenter (1)
- Children (1)
- Class action (1)
- Companion Animal (1)
- Confrontation Clause (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Controlled substance (1)
- Cooperation Agreements (1)
- Criminal Procedure (1)
- Criminal law (1)
Articles 1 - 18 of 18
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Property, Persons, And Institutionalized Police Interdiction In Byrd V. United States, Eric J. Miller
Property, Persons, And Institutionalized Police Interdiction In Byrd V. United States, Eric J. Miller
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
During a fairly routine traffic stop of a motorist driving a rental car, two State Troopers in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, discovered that the driver, Terrence Byrd, was not the listed renter. The Court ruled that Byrd nonetheless retained a Fourth Amendment right to object to the search. The Court did not address, however, why the Troopers stopped Byrd in the first place. A close examination of the case filings reveal suggests that Byrd was stopped on the basis of his race. The racial feature ofthe stop is obscured by the Court’s current property-basedinterpretation of the Fourth Amendment’s right to privacy.
Although …
Obscured Boundaries: Dimaya's Expansion Of The Void-For-Vagueness Doctrine, Katherine Brosamle
Obscured Boundaries: Dimaya's Expansion Of The Void-For-Vagueness Doctrine, Katherine Brosamle
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
No abstract provided.
Let Them Eat Cake: Why Public Proprietors Of Wedding Goods And Services Must Equally Serve All People, Labdhi Sheth, Molly Christ
Let Them Eat Cake: Why Public Proprietors Of Wedding Goods And Services Must Equally Serve All People, Labdhi Sheth, Molly Christ
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
No abstract provided.
Human Rights The "Asean Way": Exploring The Possibilities For A Regional Adr And Adjudicative Body In Southeast Asia, Mariam Sarwar
Human Rights The "Asean Way": Exploring The Possibilities For A Regional Adr And Adjudicative Body In Southeast Asia, Mariam Sarwar
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
No abstract provided.
Sexual Orientation Discrimination Under Title Vii: The Promising Road Ahead, Sydney Wright
Sexual Orientation Discrimination Under Title Vii: The Promising Road Ahead, Sydney Wright
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
No abstract provided.
"It's Open Season At The Border": Why The Bivens Remedy Should Extend To U.S. Border Patrol Agents In Cross-Border Shootings, Samantha Garza
"It's Open Season At The Border": Why The Bivens Remedy Should Extend To U.S. Border Patrol Agents In Cross-Border Shootings, Samantha Garza
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
No abstract provided.
Companion Animals Are More Than "Just" Personal Property: Oregon Supreme Court Joins Growing National Trend, Kathleen Simers
Companion Animals Are More Than "Just" Personal Property: Oregon Supreme Court Joins Growing National Trend, Kathleen Simers
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Confrontation Clause: Employing The "Greatest Legal Engine Ever Invented For The Discovery Of Truth" To Promote Justice In Criminal Courts, Ani Oganesian
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
No abstract provided.
No Child Left Behind Bars: Suspending Willful Defiance To Disassemble The School-To-Prison Pipeline, Danielle Dankner
No Child Left Behind Bars: Suspending Willful Defiance To Disassemble The School-To-Prison Pipeline, Danielle Dankner
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
With the criminalization of school discipline and the subsequent increased involvement between students and the juvenile justice system, a path from school to prison became entrenched. Public schools across the nation continued to increase their reliance on punitive disciplinary measures to punish a range of behaviors. Through these measures, schools began to perceive pushed out students as problematic, despite the lack of evidence supporting the efficacy of such policies. Due to school disciplinarians’ implicit bias when enforcing exclusionary policies, students of color and students with disabilities are most at risk. In the hopes of alleviating the devastating effects of the …
Guilty Until Proven Innocent: California's Prop. 50 Turns The Concept Of Due Process On Its Head, Brantley I. Pepperman
Guilty Until Proven Innocent: California's Prop. 50 Turns The Concept Of Due Process On Its Head, Brantley I. Pepperman
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
For decades, “good governance” has been little more than a talking point for politicians on the road to reelection or a promotion to higher office. In 2014, the California Legislature attempted to give teeth to the idea, successfully spearheading an amendment to the California Constitution approved by voters in 2016. But despite its efforts to “drain the swamp,” the Legislature gave itself a powerful tool, the authority to suspend or expel legislators without pay, that presents more problems than solutions. This article explores the implications of that amendment, including the extent to which it, as codified, comports with procedural due …
A Product Of Childhood: Accounting For Age In The Miranda Analysis, Ariana Rodriguez
A Product Of Childhood: Accounting For Age In The Miranda Analysis, Ariana Rodriguez
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
One of the most polarizing areas of constitutional criminal procedure is that relating to police interrogations and confessions. While the Fifth Amendment guarantees a number of protections from self-incrimination and the inherently coercive nature of criminal investigation, these Constitutional promises are more likely to go unfulfilled when the accused is a child. This Article thoroughly examines the current law’s use of the “totality of the circumstances” test in deciding whether a valid Miranda waiver occurred or whether a juvenile has been taken into custody and, more importantly, explores why this current test remains an inadequate solution for protecting children’s Miranda …
Guardians Of The Galaxy: How Shareholder Lawyers Won Big For Their Clients And Vindicated The Integrity Of Our Economy, Daniel J. Morrissey
Guardians Of The Galaxy: How Shareholder Lawyers Won Big For Their Clients And Vindicated The Integrity Of Our Economy, Daniel J. Morrissey
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
Securities class actions are the most economically significant form of litigation. Highly skilled lawyers expend huge sums and relentless efforts in these matters but because of the costs involved and the potential for enormous liability very few of them ever make it to trial. This Article is the story of one that did, a mammoth fraud where a jury returned a $1.5 billion verdict that, with interest, increased to almost $2.5 billion by the time the case reached the appellate court.
There the Court upheld the shareholders’ theory that their damages could be measured by the excessive amounts they had …
Caremark's Hidden Promise, Ezra Wasserman Mitchell
Caremark's Hidden Promise, Ezra Wasserman Mitchell
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
In re Caremark, decided in 1996, established for the first time a director’s duty to monitor under Delaware law. A significant amount of jurisprudence and commentary has developed. Almost all of this literature parses the language of the case and those following, and disregards the underlying claims for damages. As a result of this linguistic focus, many have concluded that the duty to monitor largely is toothless and, importantly, deals only with claims of failure to monitor legal risk. A duty to monitor business risk has been disavowed.
Following the money reveals a different story. Classifying the cases according to …
Harmonizing Federal Tax Law And The State Legalization Of Marijuana, Daniel Rowe
Harmonizing Federal Tax Law And The State Legalization Of Marijuana, Daniel Rowe
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
No abstract provided.
Bank Of America V. City Of Miami: Standing And Causation Under The Fair Housing Act, Alan M. White
Bank Of America V. City Of Miami: Standing And Causation Under The Fair Housing Act, Alan M. White
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
No abstract provided.
Foreword: Criminal Procedure In Winter, Daniel Epps
Foreword: Criminal Procedure In Winter, Daniel Epps
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
No abstract provided.
Fairness Over Finality: Peña-Rodriguez V. Colorado And The Right To An Impartial Jury, Katherine Brosamle
Fairness Over Finality: Peña-Rodriguez V. Colorado And The Right To An Impartial Jury, Katherine Brosamle
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
No abstract provided.
Buck V. Davis: Anti-Discriminatory Principles In Habeas Corpus Cases, Daniella Rubin
Buck V. Davis: Anti-Discriminatory Principles In Habeas Corpus Cases, Daniella Rubin
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
No abstract provided.