Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Digital Commons Network

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 30 of 340

Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network

All Bark, No Bite: How The Lone Star "Junk-Science Writ" Could Reinvigorate Federal Habeas Review, Robert Harry Saylor Iii Dec 2024

All Bark, No Bite: How The Lone Star "Junk-Science Writ" Could Reinvigorate Federal Habeas Review, Robert Harry Saylor Iii

Hofstra Law Review

No abstract provided.


Missing The Mark: How Miranda Fails To Consider A Minor's Mind, Julia Feron Mar 2024

Missing The Mark: How Miranda Fails To Consider A Minor's Mind, Julia Feron

Hofstra Law Review

The article focuses on the inadequacies of the Miranda rights protections for minors during custodial interrogations. It highlights how current practices, such as deceptive interrogation techniques, disproportionately affect minors who often lack the capacity to fully understand or voluntarily waive their rights. It underscores the need for legal reforms, such as mandating attorney consultation for minors before waiving their rights.


Terrible Freedom, Ambiguous Authenticity, And The Pragmatism Of The Endangered: Why Free Speech In Law School Gets Complicated, Len Niehoff Jun 2023

Terrible Freedom, Ambiguous Authenticity, And The Pragmatism Of The Endangered: Why Free Speech In Law School Gets Complicated, Len Niehoff

Hofstra Law Review

The article explores the complexities surrounding free speech in law schools, highlighting the challenges and controversies that arise in relation to guest speakers, student protests, student group agendas, faculty expression, and speech on student listservs. The author argues that understanding the dynamics of free speech in law schools requires considering factors such as the nature of private law schools, the suspension of authenticity, and the diverse life experiences of students.


Standing Back And Standing Down: Citizen Non-Cooperation And Police Non-Intervention As Causes Of Justice Failures And Crime, Paul H. Robinson, Jeffrey Seaman, Muhammad Sarahne Jun 2023

Standing Back And Standing Down: Citizen Non-Cooperation And Police Non-Intervention As Causes Of Justice Failures And Crime, Paul H. Robinson, Jeffrey Seaman, Muhammad Sarahne

Hofstra Law Review

The article discusses the failures of the American justice system to find and punish offenders for the majority of serious crimes. It highlight the low clearance and conviction rates for crimes such as murder, rape, and assault. It further argues that these failures of justice have practical consequences on crime rates and also disproportionately affect racial minorities and low-income communities.


Put Down The Phone! The Standard For Witness Interviews Is In-Person, Face-To-Face, One-On-One, Sean D. O'Brien, Quinn C. O'Brien, Dana Cook Dec 2022

Put Down The Phone! The Standard For Witness Interviews Is In-Person, Face-To-Face, One-On-One, Sean D. O'Brien, Quinn C. O'Brien, Dana Cook

Hofstra Law Review

The article focuses on professional standards for investigative interviews, the social science supporting the in-person, face-to-face interview standard. It mentions standards that apply to capital mitigation work, the problems created by remote witness interviews are not unique to death penalty work. It also mentions police officers, social workers, parole officers, and defense investigators knock on doors and mental health experts investigated prevailing standards of performance.


Front Matter Dec 2022

Front Matter

Hofstra Law Review

No abstract provided.


Textualism's Immigration Problem: Stabilizing Interpretive Rules On Noncitizens' Rights And Remedies, Peter Margulies Dec 2022

Textualism's Immigration Problem: Stabilizing Interpretive Rules On Noncitizens' Rights And Remedies, Peter Margulies

Hofstra Law Review

The article focuses on textualism immigration problem as the U.S. Supreme Court has applied textualist methodology in immigration cases and misread the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). It mentions application of linguistic canons occurs in a comparative, probabilistic assessment to resolve conflicts and analysis of statutory interpretation generally and immigration law in particular. It also mentions discusses inconsistencies in multi-member tribunals, such as appellate courts.


Re-Directing The 50-Year-Long War On Drugs In The United States: Safe Injection Sites As The Necessary Weapons, Tessa Ptucha Jun 2022

Re-Directing The 50-Year-Long War On Drugs In The United States: Safe Injection Sites As The Necessary Weapons, Tessa Ptucha

Hofstra Law Review

No abstract provided.


Front Matter Jun 2022

Front Matter

Hofstra Law Review

No abstract provided.


Pennsylvania Lawyers Behaving Badly: Is 8.4(G) A Solution?, Ellen Brotman, Amy Coco Mar 2022

Pennsylvania Lawyers Behaving Badly: Is 8.4(G) A Solution?, Ellen Brotman, Amy Coco

Hofstra Law Review

The article focuses on American Bar Association (ABA) adopted Model Rule of Professional Conduct 8.4(g), broadening the definition of attorney misconduct. It mentions affirmative rules or comments to Rule 8.4(d)2 that already reflected these values, few states defined attorney misconduct to include discrimination and sexual harassment. It also mentions Greenberg v. Haggerty, a federal court declared that the rule violated the First Amendment.


Front Matter Mar 2022

Front Matter

Hofstra Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Final Act: Deportation By Ice Air, Deborah M. Weissman, Angelina Godoy, Havan M. Clark Dec 2021

The Final Act: Deportation By Ice Air, Deborah M. Weissman, Angelina Godoy, Havan M. Clark

Hofstra Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Case For Abolishing Absolute Prosecutorial Immunity On Equal Protection Grounds, Samantha M. Caspar, Artem M. Joukov Dec 2021

The Case For Abolishing Absolute Prosecutorial Immunity On Equal Protection Grounds, Samantha M. Caspar, Artem M. Joukov

Hofstra Law Review

No abstract provided.


Front Matter Sep 2021

Front Matter

Hofstra Law Review

No abstract provided.


Front Matter Jun 2021

Front Matter

Hofstra Law Review

No abstract provided.


Front Matter Mar 2021

Front Matter

Hofstra Law Review

No abstract provided.


Too Many Chips On The Table: A Call For The Bifurcation Of Money And Custody In Divorce, Alexa R. Schwartz Mar 2021

Too Many Chips On The Table: A Call For The Bifurcation Of Money And Custody In Divorce, Alexa R. Schwartz

Hofstra Law Review

No abstract provided.


Lessons From The Present: Three Crises And Their Potential Impact On The Legal Profession, Raymond H. Brescia Mar 2021

Lessons From The Present: Three Crises And Their Potential Impact On The Legal Profession, Raymond H. Brescia

Hofstra Law Review

The United States faces three simultaneous crises: a pandemic, a civil-rights reckoning, and a crisis of democracy. The first of these crises has sparked dramatic—though potentially temporary—changes to the practice of law: moving much legal work to remote settings almost overnight, after the profession had largely resisted making such accommodations for decades. The second has sparked an assessment of the extent to which the practice of law and the legal system are both riddled with racism and institutional bias. The third, the crisis of democracy, has lawyers at its center, filing frivolous claims and fomenting an armed insurrection with designs …


Super-Dissenters, Nicholas L. Georgakopoulos Mar 2021

Super-Dissenters, Nicholas L. Georgakopoulos

Hofstra Law Review

An overview of adjudication by the Supreme Court reveals three phenomena. In the 1976 term, unanimous decisions switch from being decidedly liberal to even, and in 1990, they switch to greater frequency. Also, during the 1970s and 1980s, the Supreme Court displays greater complexity of coalition formation. The departures of Justice Douglas in the first case, and of Justices Brennan and Marshall in the last two, have explanatory power. A look back at pre-WWII data indicates both changes are in the direction of returning to older patterns.


Is Demilitarizing Military Justice An Ethical Imperative For Congress, The Courts, And The Commander-In-Chief?, Dan Maurer Sep 2020

Is Demilitarizing Military Justice An Ethical Imperative For Congress, The Courts, And The Commander-In-Chief?, Dan Maurer

Hofstra Law Review

This symposium introduction to ethics in military justice highlights that professional responsibility norms, expectations, and problems impact and imperial this discipline just as they do in any other criminal justice system. But in such a dizzyingly specialized criminal justice schema, the problems and perils of legal ethics and professional responsibility are both heightened and clouded by their seemingly difficult remoteness. Because the context of military justice implicates -- to various degrees -- national security, and not just individual cases and individual parties, special attention is owed in several critical areas. Political interference in military prosecutions has a long history, and …


A House Divided: The Unique Ethical Dynamic Of Civilian And Military Co-Counsel Relations In Court-Martial Defense, Robert E. Murdough Sep 2020

A House Divided: The Unique Ethical Dynamic Of Civilian And Military Co-Counsel Relations In Court-Martial Defense, Robert E. Murdough

Hofstra Law Review

No abstract provided.


Probable Cause And The Provable Case: Bridging The Ethical Gap That Exists In The Military Justice System, Mitchell M. Suliman Sep 2020

Probable Cause And The Provable Case: Bridging The Ethical Gap That Exists In The Military Justice System, Mitchell M. Suliman

Hofstra Law Review

No abstract provided.


Front Matter Sep 2020

Front Matter

Hofstra Law Review

No abstract provided.


Court-Martial Sentences: Time For More Transparency, Christopher E. Martin, Timothy P. Hayes Jr. Sep 2020

Court-Martial Sentences: Time For More Transparency, Christopher E. Martin, Timothy P. Hayes Jr.

Hofstra Law Review

No abstract provided.


Ordering Injustice: Congress, Command Corruption Of Courts-Martial, And The Constitution, Rachel E. Vanlandingham Sep 2020

Ordering Injustice: Congress, Command Corruption Of Courts-Martial, And The Constitution, Rachel E. Vanlandingham

Hofstra Law Review

No abstract provided.


Front Matter Mar 2020

Front Matter

Hofstra Law Review

No abstract provided.


Stepping Up To The Challenge Of Leadership On Race, Anthony C. Thompson Mar 2020

Stepping Up To The Challenge Of Leadership On Race, Anthony C. Thompson

Hofstra Law Review

No abstract provided.


It's Time To Believe: Resolving The Circuit Split Over The Good-Faith Exception To The Exclusionary Rule, Blake R. Hills Mar 2020

It's Time To Believe: Resolving The Circuit Split Over The Good-Faith Exception To The Exclusionary Rule, Blake R. Hills

Hofstra Law Review

No abstract provided.


Front Matter Dec 2019

Front Matter

Hofstra Law Review

No abstract provided.


Prevention Not Punishment: Child Victims Of Sex Trafficking Must Be Treated Not Detained, Juliana Spano Sep 2019

Prevention Not Punishment: Child Victims Of Sex Trafficking Must Be Treated Not Detained, Juliana Spano

Hofstra Law Review

No abstract provided.