Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law (351)
- Criminal Procedure (89)
- Criminal Law (78)
- Supreme Court of the United States (55)
- Constitutional Law (50)
-
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (34)
- International Law (32)
- Evidence (28)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (24)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (22)
- Courts (16)
- Legal Education (15)
- Judges (11)
- Fourth Amendment (10)
- Law and Gender (10)
- International Humanitarian Law (9)
- Military, War, and Peace (9)
- Science and Technology Law (9)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (8)
- Criminology and Criminal Justice (8)
- Juvenile Law (8)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (8)
- Legal Studies (8)
- Immigration Law (7)
- Law and Race (7)
- Legal Profession (7)
- Privacy Law (7)
- Administrative Law (6)
- Labor and Employment Law (6)
- Law and Society (6)
- Keyword
-
- Criminal Procedure (36)
- Criminal Law (33)
- United States Supreme Court (33)
- Administration of Criminal Justice (19)
- Evidence (18)
-
- Police (18)
- Police Reform (16)
- International Law (14)
- Capital Punishment (12)
- Prosecutors (11)
- Public Prosecutors (11)
- Police Brutality (10)
- Criminal Justice System (9)
- Criminal justice system (9)
- Police Misconduct (9)
- Right to Counsel (9)
- Plea Bargaining (8)
- Sentences (8)
- United States Constitution 4th Amendment (8)
- Constitutional Law (7)
- Judges (7)
- Police Accountability (7)
- Race Discrimination (7)
- Right of Privacy (7)
- Searches and Seizures (7)
- Book review (6)
- Decision Making in Prosecution (6)
- Entrapment (6)
- Hearsay Evidence (6)
- Miranda Rule (6)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Publications (253)
- Student Newspaper (Amicus, Advocate...) (61)
- The Docket (53)
- Popular Media (46)
- Supreme Court Preview (45)
-
- Course Information (29)
- Admissions Brochure (28)
- Annual Report (15)
- IBRL Events (12)
- Colonial Lawyer (5)
- The Brief (5)
- Library Handbook (4)
- Commencement Exercises (3)
- News Letter (3)
- William & Mary Law School Clinical Program Newsletter (3)
- Briefs (2)
- Faculty Exams: 1944-1973 (2)
- George Wythe Lecture (2)
- History of William & Mary Law School (2)
- In Brief (2)
- Library Staff Publications (2)
- Other Events & Lectures (2)
- 2009–2020: Davison M. Douglas (1)
- 2015 Property Conference (1)
- 2016 Property Conference (1)
- Congressional Testimony (1)
- IBRL History (1)
- James Goold Cutler Lecture (1)
- Law School Experiences with Racial & Social Justice Issues (1)
- Law School News Archive (1)
Articles 1 - 30 of 592
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Eliminating Rule 609 To Provide A Fair Opportunity To Defend Against Criminal Charges: A Proposal To The Advisory Committee On The Federal Rules Of Evidence, Jeffrey Bellin
Faculty Publications
Federal Rule of Evidence 609 authorizes the admission of prior convictions to impeach criminal defendants who testify. And in this important and uniquely damaging application, the [r]ule’s logic fails, distorting American trials and depriving defendants of a fair opportunity to defend against the charges. The Advisory Committee [on Evidence Rules (the “Advisory Committee”)] should propose the elimination of Rule 609 and prohibit cross-examination with specific instances of a criminal defendant’s past conduct when those instances are unrelated to the defendant’s testimony and unconnected to the case.
This short essay begins by setting out the proposed rule change alongside a proposed …
William & Mary Law School Clinical Program News (2023-2024), William & Mary Law School
William & Mary Law School Clinical Program News (2023-2024), William & Mary Law School
William & Mary Law School Clinical Program Newsletter
No abstract provided.
Holding Aggressors Responsible For International Crimes: Implementing The Unequal Enforcement Doctrine, Nancy Amoury Combs
Holding Aggressors Responsible For International Crimes: Implementing The Unequal Enforcement Doctrine, Nancy Amoury Combs
Faculty Publications
It is a fundamental tenet of the laws of war that they apply equally to all parties to a conflict. For this reason, a party such as Russia — that illegally launches a war — benefits from all the same rights as a party such as Ukraine — that is forced to defend against the illegal aggression. Countless philosophers have shown that this so-called equal application doctrine is morally indefensible because defenders should have more rights and fewer responsibilities than aggressors. Legal scholars continue to support the equal application doctrine, however, because they reasonably fear that applying different rules to …
Symposium Introduction: The Effect Of Dobbs On Work Law, Nicole B. Porter
Symposium Introduction: The Effect Of Dobbs On Work Law, Nicole B. Porter
Faculty Publications
In March 2023, Chicago-Kent College of Law hosted a symposium—The Effect of Dobbs on Work Law—to explore the ways that the Dobbs abortion decision has affected the workplace. The presenters at that live symposium wrote articles that are being published in this journal. As the host of the symposium and the Editor of this Journal, I use this Article to introduce the articles in this symposium issue and to provide my reflections on them. I also briefly address the topic that I presented at the symposium—the effect of Dobbs on people with disabilities.
Ai-Based Evidence In Criminal Trials?, Sabine Gless, Fredric I. Lederer, Thomas Weigend
Ai-Based Evidence In Criminal Trials?, Sabine Gless, Fredric I. Lederer, Thomas Weigend
Faculty Publications
Smart devices are increasingly the origin of critical criminal case data. The importance of such data, especially data generated when using modern automobiles, is likely to become even more important as increasingly complex methods of machine learning lead to AI-based evidence being autonomously generated by devices. This article reviews the admissibility of such evidence from both American and German perspectives. As a result of this comparative approach, the authors conclude that American evidence law could be improved by borrowing aspects of the expert testimony approaches used in Germany’s “inquisitorial” court system.
Principles Of Prosecutor Lenience, Jeffrey Bellin
Principles Of Prosecutor Lenience, Jeffrey Bellin
Faculty Publications
[T]here are profound questions about the when and why of lenience, and particularly prosecutor lenience. The answers speak to one of the great mysteries of American criminal law: the role of the prosecutor. I have taken on this mystery in recent years and continue the effort here by offering a skeletal framework for prosecutor leniency. The framework proposes three principles of prosecutor lenience. Prosecutor lenience should be (1) non-arbitrary, (2) equal, and (3) abundant.
[...]
This Symposium Essay explores prosecutorial lenience through the lens set out above. Part I defines prosecutorial lenience and proposes three principles to guide its exercise. …
Can Judges Help Ease Mass Incarceration?, Jeffrey Bellin
Can Judges Help Ease Mass Incarceration?, Jeffrey Bellin
Faculty Publications
A scholar considers how judges have contributed to historically high incarceration rates -- and how they can help reverse the trend.
Mercy For The Masses: A Default Rule For Automatically Triggered Commutations, Adam Gershowitz
Mercy For The Masses: A Default Rule For Automatically Triggered Commutations, Adam Gershowitz
Faculty Publications
This Essay considers how governors who are interested in reducing mass imprisonment can provide “mercy for the masses” who are in the middle of the criminal justice punishment spectrum. It draws on the successful mass pardons for misdemeanor marijuana offenses, as well as the aspects of the Obama Clemency Initiative that worked well. The proposals that follow offer four variations on a default rule for automatic, but modest, mass commutations.
[...]
This Essay proceeds as follows. First, Part I explains how the modern clemency power has often been focused on death penalty cases and low-level misdemeanors. Part II then recounts …
Aggressor Status And Its Impact On International Criminal Law Case Selection, Nancy Amoury Combs
Aggressor Status And Its Impact On International Criminal Law Case Selection, Nancy Amoury Combs
Faculty Publications
The laws of war apply equally to all parties to a conflict; thus, a party that violates international law by launching a war is granted the same international humanitarian law rights as a party that is required to defend against the illegal war. This doctrine—known as the equal application doctrine—has been sharply critiqued, particularly by philosophers, who claim the doctrine to be morally indefensible. Lawyers and legal academics, by contrast, defend the equal application doctrine because they reasonably fear that applying different rules to different warring parties will sharply reduce states’ willingness to comply with the international humanitarian law system …
Laundering Police Lies, Adam Gershowitz, Caroline E. Lewis
Laundering Police Lies, Adam Gershowitz, Caroline E. Lewis
Faculty Publications
Police officers—like ordinary people—are regularly dishonest. Officers lie under oath (testilying), on police reports (reportilying), and in a myriad of other situations. Despite decades of evidence about police lies, the U.S. Supreme Court regularly believes police stories that are utterly implausible. Either because the Court is gullible, willfully blind, or complicit, the justices have simply rubber-stamped police lies in numerous high-profile cases. For instance, the Court has accepted police claims that a suspect had bags of cocaine displayed in his lap at the end of a police chase (Whren v. United States), that officers saw marijuana through a …
Sentencing In An Era Of Plea Bargains, Jeffrey Bellin, Jenia I. Turner
Sentencing In An Era Of Plea Bargains, Jeffrey Bellin, Jenia I. Turner
Faculty Publications
The literature offers inconsistent answers to a question that is foundational to criminal law: Who imposes sentences? Traditional narratives place sentencing responsibility in the hands of the judge. Yet, in a country where 95% of criminal convictions come from guilty pleas (not trials), modern American scholars center prosecutors—who control plea terms—as the deciders of punishment. This Article highlights and seeks to resolve the tension between these conflicting narratives by charting the pathways by which sentences are determined in a system dominated by plea bargains.
After reviewing the empirical literature on sentence variation, examining state and federal plea-bargaining rules and doctrines, …
The Philosophy Of Ai: Learning From History, Shaping Our Future. Hearing Before The Committee On Homeland Security And Government Affairs, Senate, One Hundred Eighteenth Congress, First Session., Margaret Hu
Congressional Testimony
No abstract provided.
Biden's Executive Order Puts Civil Rights Rights In The Middle Of The Ai Regulation Discussion, Margaret Hu
Biden's Executive Order Puts Civil Rights Rights In The Middle Of The Ai Regulation Discussion, Margaret Hu
Popular Media
No abstract provided.
The Brief (Edition #30, October 2023), William & Mary Law School
The Brief (Edition #30, October 2023), William & Mary Law School
The Brief
No abstract provided.
Divided Court Finds Generic Redactions Sufficient To Admit Confessions Of Non-Testifying Codefendants, Jeffrey Bellin
Divided Court Finds Generic Redactions Sufficient To Admit Confessions Of Non-Testifying Codefendants, Jeffrey Bellin
Popular Media
No abstract provided.
Criminal Justice Reform And The Centrality Of Intent, Cynthia V. Ward
Criminal Justice Reform And The Centrality Of Intent, Cynthia V. Ward
Faculty Publications
The nationwide movement for criminal justice reform has produced numerous proposals to amend procedural and sentencing practices in the American criminal justice system. These include plans to abolish mandatory minimum schemes in criminal sentencing; address discrimination in charging, convicting, and sentencing; reform drug policy; rectify discriminatory policies and practices in policing; assist incarcerated individuals in re-entering society when released from prison; and reorganize our system of juvenile justice. But less attention has been given to reforming the substantive content of the criminal law—specifically, to addressing flaws in how the law defines the elements of criminal culpability and deploys them in …
Q&A: W&M Law Professor Jeffrey Bellin On 'Mass Incarceration Nation', W&M Law School Staff, Jeffrey Bellin
Q&A: W&M Law Professor Jeffrey Bellin On 'Mass Incarceration Nation', W&M Law School Staff, Jeffrey Bellin
Popular Media
No abstract provided.
The Brief (Edition #26, April 2023), William & Mary Law School
The Brief (Edition #26, April 2023), William & Mary Law School
The Brief
No abstract provided.
What Trump's Business Fraud Charges Mean -- A Former Prosecutor Explains The 34 Felony Counts And Obstacles Ahead For Manhattan's Da, Jeffrey Bellin
What Trump's Business Fraud Charges Mean -- A Former Prosecutor Explains The 34 Felony Counts And Obstacles Ahead For Manhattan's Da, Jeffrey Bellin
Popular Media
No abstract provided.
William & Mary Law School Clinical Program News (2022-2023), William & Mary Law School
William & Mary Law School Clinical Program News (2022-2023), William & Mary Law School
William & Mary Law School Clinical Program Newsletter
No abstract provided.
Legal Order At The Border, Evan J. Criddle
Legal Order At The Border, Evan J. Criddle
Faculty Publications
For generations, the United States has grappled with high levels of illegal immigration across the U.S.-Mexico border. This Article offers a novel theoretical framework to explain why legal order remains elusive at the border. Drawing inspiration from Lon Fuller’s “interactional view of law,” I argue that immigration law cannot attract compliance unless it is general, public, prospective, clear, consistent, and stable; obedience with its rules is feasible; and the law’s enforcement is congruent with the rules as enacted. The flagrant violation of any one of these principles could frustrate the development of a functional legal order. Remarkably, U.S. immigration law …
Trump's Indictment Stretches Us Legal System In New Ways -- A Former Prosecutor Explains 4 Key Points To Understand, Jeffrey Bellin
Trump's Indictment Stretches Us Legal System In New Ways -- A Former Prosecutor Explains 4 Key Points To Understand, Jeffrey Bellin
Popular Media
No abstract provided.
The Brief (Edition #25, March 2023), William & Mary Law School
The Brief (Edition #25, March 2023), William & Mary Law School
The Brief
No abstract provided.
Understanding Mass Incarceration In The Us Is The First Step To Reducing A Swollen Prison Population, Jeffrey Bellin
Understanding Mass Incarceration In The Us Is The First Step To Reducing A Swollen Prison Population, Jeffrey Bellin
Popular Media
No abstract provided.
Reducing Community Violence While Protecting Civil Rights, Kami Chavis
Reducing Community Violence While Protecting Civil Rights, Kami Chavis
Popular Media
No abstract provided.
"Civil Procedure Is What It's All About": Law School Dean A. Benjamin Spencer Reflects On Career, Molly Parks, A. Benjamin Spencer
"Civil Procedure Is What It's All About": Law School Dean A. Benjamin Spencer Reflects On Career, Molly Parks, A. Benjamin Spencer
Popular Media
No abstract provided.
Plea Bargaining's Uncertainty Problem, Jeffrey Bellin
Plea Bargaining's Uncertainty Problem, Jeffrey Bellin
Faculty Publications
While commentators roundly condemn plea bargaining, the criticism can be as muddled as the practice itself. Critics’ primary target is the “trial penalty.” But a differential between guilty-plea and trial sentences seems inevitable in any system that allows defendants to concede guilt. And, as a new wave of “progressive prosecutors” is demonstrating, gaps between (unusually lenient) plea offers and long (potential) post-trial sentences are not only a strong incentive to plead guilty but also a powerful tool for reducing American penal severity. Other critiques point to flaws that parallel those found in the broader system, overlooking that plea bargaining is …
Plea Bargains: Efficient Or Unjust?, Jeffrey Bellin, Erin Blondel, John Flynn, Elana Fogel, Anjelica Hendricks, Carissa Byrne Hessick
Plea Bargains: Efficient Or Unjust?, Jeffrey Bellin, Erin Blondel, John Flynn, Elana Fogel, Anjelica Hendricks, Carissa Byrne Hessick
Faculty Publications
The vast majority of state and federal cases end in plea bargains. The practice has eased backlogs and may benefit some defendants — but the trade-offs, some say, are too steep. Is there a better way?
Political Default. The Implications Of Weaponizing Global Financial Infrastructure, Lev E. Breydo
Political Default. The Implications Of Weaponizing Global Financial Infrastructure, Lev E. Breydo
Faculty Publications
In response to Russia’s unlawful invasion of Ukraine, the U.S. has led a broad-based global coalition to punish the aggressor with an “unprecedented” sanction regime. Those measures have targeted “the Russian government’s basic tools to manage its macroeconomy,” with a particular emphasis on its sovereign debt. That concerted focus, as this Article empirically demonstrates through analysis of bond and credit default swap data, ultimately resulted in Russia’s first foreign currency debt default in over a century — despite the nation’s ability and seeming willingness to pay.
Notwithstanding aptly-deserved “just deserts” considerations, a forced — or “political” — Russian sovereign debt …
Alcohol Misuse And Gun Violence: An Evidence-Based Approach For State Policy, Silvia Villarreal, Amy Bornhorst, Richard Bonnie, Kami Chavis, Ari Davis, Shannon Frattaroli, Kelly Roskam, Jeffrey Swanson, Joshua Horwitz
Alcohol Misuse And Gun Violence: An Evidence-Based Approach For State Policy, Silvia Villarreal, Amy Bornhorst, Richard Bonnie, Kami Chavis, Ari Davis, Shannon Frattaroli, Kelly Roskam, Jeffrey Swanson, Joshua Horwitz
Faculty Publications
During the COVID-19 pandemic, excessive drinking increased by 21% and alcohol-related deaths increased approximately 25%.6 At the same time, gun sales increased by 40%, gun homicides by 35%, and gun suicides had the largest one-year increase ever recorded.
These alarming trends urge us to think about alcohol misuse as a risk factor for gun violence. To better understand this connection, the Consortium, in partnership with the Center for Gun Violence Solutions, developed this report to highlight the available research to inform policy. As detailed in this report, alcohol misuse is associated with a risk of dangerous firearm behaviors, interpersonal firearm …