Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- Faculty Senate (9)
- University of South Carolina (9)
- Ethics (2)
- Communications Law (1)
- Confrontation Clause (1)
-
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Crimes (1)
- Criminal Law (1)
- Criminal law (1)
- Criminal legal system (1)
- Cultural defenses (1)
- Culture (1)
- Defendants (1)
- Dispute Resolution (1)
- Drugs (1)
- Due process (1)
- Education Law (1)
- Fifth Amendment (1)
- Health (1)
- Hearsay Rule (1)
- Human rights (1)
- Indigenous people (1)
- Juries (1)
- Kansas v Crane (1)
- Law Enforcement (1)
- Legal Education (1)
- Legal Ethics (1)
- Legal Profession (1)
- Legal education (1)
- Mental Health (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 22 of 22
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
December 1, 2004 Faculty Senate Minutes, University Of South Carolina
December 1, 2004 Faculty Senate Minutes, University Of South Carolina
Faculty Senate
No abstract provided.
November 3, 2004 Faculty Senate Minutes, University Of South Carolina
November 3, 2004 Faculty Senate Minutes, University Of South Carolina
Faculty Senate
No abstract provided.
Crawford V. Washington And The Irretrievable Breakdown Of A Union: Separating The Confrontation Clause From The Hearsay Rule, Thomas J. Reed
Crawford V. Washington And The Irretrievable Breakdown Of A Union: Separating The Confrontation Clause From The Hearsay Rule, Thomas J. Reed
South Carolina Law Review
No abstract provided.
September 29, 2004 Faculty Senate Minutes, University Of South Carolina
September 29, 2004 Faculty Senate Minutes, University Of South Carolina
Faculty Senate
No abstract provided.
September 1, 2004 Faculty Senate Minutes, University Of South Carolina
September 1, 2004 Faculty Senate Minutes, University Of South Carolina
Faculty Senate
No abstract provided.
Culture Clash: Teaching Cultural Defenses In The Criminal Law Classroom, Susan S. Kuo
Culture Clash: Teaching Cultural Defenses In The Criminal Law Classroom, Susan S. Kuo
Faculty Publications
In the law school classroom, the Socratic method of legal analysis removes a dispute at issue in a given case from its sociocultural context and takes the cultural backgrounds of the parties into account only when they serve the legal argument. The language of the law commands law students to siphon off the emotional and cultural content because of the enduring belief that the law is neutral and impartial. Accordingly, cultural conflicts are deemed irrelevant to legal analysis because laws are unbiased and culture-blind. This detached outlook has been termed perpectivelessness to denote a neutral, odorless, colorless non-perspective.
This essay …
Reappraising T.L.O.'S Special Needs Doctrine In An Era Of School-Law Enforcement Entanglement, Josh Gupta-Kagan
Reappraising T.L.O.'S Special Needs Doctrine In An Era Of School-Law Enforcement Entanglement, Josh Gupta-Kagan
Faculty Publications
This essay presents one doctrinal method for lawyers to defend children accused of criminal charges in juvenile or adult court: attacking the applicability of the twenty-year old case, New Jersey v. T.L.O., to most school searches. T.L.O. based its application of a lower standard for searches of students by school officials on the presumption that firm gates separate public school from law enforcement and criminal justice institutions. Later administrative search cases inside and outside of the school context show that tee lower standard of T.L.O. depends entirely on programmatic purposes that distinguish school systems and ordinary law enforcement. Porous schoolhouse …
June 23, 2004 Faculty Senate Minutes, University Of South Carolina
June 23, 2004 Faculty Senate Minutes, University Of South Carolina
Faculty Senate
No abstract provided.
April 29, 2004 Faculty Senate Minutes, University Of South Carolina
April 29, 2004 Faculty Senate Minutes, University Of South Carolina
Faculty Senate
No abstract provided.
April 7, 2004 Faculty Senate Minutes, University Of South Carolina
April 7, 2004 Faculty Senate Minutes, University Of South Carolina
Faculty Senate
No abstract provided.
Just Say Yes: Sell V. United States And Inadequate Limitations On The Forced Medication Of Defendants In Order To Render Competence For Trial, Aaron R. Dias
South Carolina Law Review
No abstract provided.
Duties And Responsibilities Of Lawyers In Light Of In Re Myers: Are You Aware, Sarah Theresa Eibling
Duties And Responsibilities Of Lawyers In Light Of In Re Myers: Are You Aware, Sarah Theresa Eibling
South Carolina Law Review
No abstract provided.
Identity Protection For Sexual Assault Victims: Exploring Alternatives To The Publication Of Private Facts Tort, Kimberly Kelley Blackburn
Identity Protection For Sexual Assault Victims: Exploring Alternatives To The Publication Of Private Facts Tort, Kimberly Kelley Blackburn
South Carolina Law Review
No abstract provided.
Toward A Better Benchmark: Assessing The Utility Of Not-At-Fault Traffic Crash Data In Racial Profiling Research, Geoffrey P. Alpert, Michael R. Smith, Roger G. Dunham
Toward A Better Benchmark: Assessing The Utility Of Not-At-Fault Traffic Crash Data In Racial Profiling Research, Geoffrey P. Alpert, Michael R. Smith, Roger G. Dunham
Faculty Publications
As studies on racial profiling and biased policing have begun to proliferate, researchers are debating which benchmark is most appropriate for comparison with police traffic stop data. Existing benchmark populations, which include populations estimated from census figures, licensed drivers, arrestees, reported crime suspects, and observed drivers and traffic violators, all have significant limitations. This article offers a new, alternative benchmark for police traffic stops, a benchmark that has not been previously applied or tested in a racial profiling research setting. The analysis presented compares traffic observation data, gathered at selected, high volume intersections during an ongoing racial profiling study in …
March 3, 2004 Faculty Senate Minutes, University Of South Carolina
March 3, 2004 Faculty Senate Minutes, University Of South Carolina
Faculty Senate
No abstract provided.
February 11, 2004 Faculty Senate Minutes, University Of South Carolina
February 11, 2004 Faculty Senate Minutes, University Of South Carolina
Faculty Senate
No abstract provided.
Instruct The Jury: Crane's "Serious Difficulty" Requirement And Due Process, Kenneth W. Gaines
Instruct The Jury: Crane's "Serious Difficulty" Requirement And Due Process, Kenneth W. Gaines
South Carolina Law Review
No abstract provided.
Inadmissible But Material? Resolving The Circuit Split After Wood, Colin Miller
Inadmissible But Material? Resolving The Circuit Split After Wood, Colin Miller
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Popular Culture As A Lens On Legal Professionalism, Alexander W. Scherr, Hillary Brave Farber
Popular Culture As A Lens On Legal Professionalism, Alexander W. Scherr, Hillary Brave Farber
South Carolina Law Review
No abstract provided.
My Last Lecture: Unsolicited Advice For Future And Current Lawyers, Stephen D. Easton
My Last Lecture: Unsolicited Advice For Future And Current Lawyers, Stephen D. Easton
South Carolina Law Review
No abstract provided.
Banishment From Within And Without: Analyzing Indigenous Sentencing Under International Human Rights Standards, Colin Miller
Banishment From Within And Without: Analyzing Indigenous Sentencing Under International Human Rights Standards, Colin Miller
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Instruct The Jury: Crane's Serious Difficulty Requirement & Due Process, Kenneth Gaines
Instruct The Jury: Crane's Serious Difficulty Requirement & Due Process, Kenneth Gaines
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.