Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Digital Commons Network

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

University of Richmond

1991

Bill of Rights

Articles 1 - 3 of 3

Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network

The Threat Of A Second Constitutional Convention: Patrick Henry's Lasting Legacy, Jeffery K. Mitchell Jan 1991

The Threat Of A Second Constitutional Convention: Patrick Henry's Lasting Legacy, Jeffery K. Mitchell

University of Richmond Law Review

The Bill of Rights secured the individual freedoms that constitute the mainstay of American liberty. The Framers of the Constitution did not include these vital rights in the original version of the document. In fact, the first ten amendments were proposed by Congress to secure ratification of the Constitution and, more importantly, to prevent a second constitutional convention.


Understanding "Rights" And Bills Of Rights, Albert P. Blaustein, Carol Tenney Jan 1991

Understanding "Rights" And Bills Of Rights, Albert P. Blaustein, Carol Tenney

University of Richmond Law Review

Scholars hold that there are forty to fifty distinct human rights. History teaches that they should be constitutionally enshrined. In this modern era when constitution-making is multiplying, drafters of bills of rights must now determine questions of formulation and location. How should these forty to fifty distinct human rights be classified; where in these constitutions should these rights be recited?


Virginia And The Ratification Of The Bill Of Rights, 1789-1791, J. Gordon Hylton Jan 1991

Virginia And The Ratification Of The Bill Of Rights, 1789-1791, J. Gordon Hylton

University of Richmond Law Review

Historians and constitutional scholars have paid scant attention to the process by which the states ratified the Bill of Rights. The states' ratifying conventions of 1787 and 1788 have been examined in great detail, as have the debates of the first Congress which led to the presentation of the Bill of Rights to the states. Scholars, however, have treated the ratification of the first ten amendments as little more than an historical formality. Why more than two full years passed between the Congressional adoption of the proposed amendments and the approval by the requisite number of states has never been …