Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law (131)
- Criminal Law (16)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (14)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (12)
- Constitutional Law (11)
-
- Criminal Procedure (11)
- Law and Gender (11)
- Courts (10)
- Family Law (10)
- Labor and Employment Law (10)
- First Amendment (8)
- Contracts (7)
- Legislation (7)
- Housing Law (6)
- Internet Law (6)
- Health Law and Policy (5)
- Insurance Law (5)
- Legal Education (5)
- Religion Law (5)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (4)
- Supreme Court of the United States (4)
- Law and Economics (3)
- Law and Society (3)
- Legal Remedies (3)
- Litigation (3)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (3)
- Torts (3)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (2)
- Bankruptcy Law (2)
- Education Law (2)
- Keyword
-
- Dispute resolution (11)
- Contracts (10)
- Discrimination (10)
- Gender (8)
- Arbitration (7)
-
- Consumer protection (7)
- Sentencing (7)
- ADR (6)
- Civil rights (6)
- E-contracts (6)
- Employment (6)
- First amendment (6)
- Consumer contracts (5)
- Federal sentencing guidelines (5)
- Remedies (5)
- Behavioral economics (4)
- Constitution (4)
- Criminal law (4)
- Family (4)
- First Amendment (4)
- Housing (4)
- International law (4)
- ODR (4)
- Workplace (4)
- Adoption (3)
- Blakely (3)
- Booker (3)
- Consumer law (3)
- Contract theory (3)
- Debt (3)
Articles 1 - 30 of 132
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
The Causation Canon, Sandra F. Sperino
The Causation Canon, Sandra F. Sperino
Faculty Publications
It is rare to witness the birth of a canon of statutory interpretation. In the past decade, the Supreme Court created a new canon-the causation canon. When a statute uses any causal language, the Court will assume that Congress meant to require the plaintiff to establish "but-for" cause.
This Article is the first to name, recognize and discuss this new canon. The Article traces the birth of the canon, showing that the canon did not exist until 2013 and was not certain until 2020. Demonstrating how the Court constructed this new canon yields several new insights about statutory interpretation.
The …
Victims As Instruments, Rachel J. Wechsler
Victims As Instruments, Rachel J. Wechsler
Faculty Publications
Crime victims are often instrumentalized within the criminal legal process in furtherance of state prosecutorial interests. This is a particularly salient issue concerning victims of gender-based violence (GBV) because victim testimony is typically considered essential for successful prosecution of these types of crimes. Since the U.S. Supreme Court's 2004 decision in Crawford v. Washington, courts require declarants to be available for cross-examination on "testimonial" hearsay evidence. Consequently, criminal legal actors are further incentivized to employ highly coercive practices aimed at securing GBV victims' participation in the criminal legal process as evidentiary tools. These practices include arresting and incarcerating victims through …
Food, Freedom, Fairness, And The Family Farm, Robin M. Rotman, Sophie Mendelson
Food, Freedom, Fairness, And The Family Farm, Robin M. Rotman, Sophie Mendelson
Faculty Publications
The concept of the “family farm” holds powerful sway within the American narrative, embodying both nostalgia for an imagined past and anxiety for a future perceived to be under threat. Since the founding of the United States, this cultural ideal has been invoked in support of a rosy vision of agrarian democracy while obscuring the ways in which the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s codified definition of “family farm” has unfairly aggregated advantages for the benefit of a particular kind of family (nuclear) and farmer (white, male, straight). At the same time, consumers are misled by an under-interrogated conflation of family …
Beyond Stress Reduction: Mindfulness As A Skill For Developing Authentic Professional Identity, Richard C. Reuben
Beyond Stress Reduction: Mindfulness As A Skill For Developing Authentic Professional Identity, Richard C. Reuben
Faculty Publications
Mindfulness is often touted in the legal field for its capacity to help reduce stress and improve focus through the management of distractions. However, the potential contributions of mindfulness practice for the legal profession extend beyond stress reduction' and include great promise for helping lawyers understand who they are as members of the legal profession - that is, their professional identity. This knowledge is empowering because it allows lawyers facing ethical quandaries to make choices that better align their professional values with their personal values, rather than aligning their personal values with professional values and societal expectations of success. In …
Measuring "Access To Justice" In The Rush To Digitize, Amy J. Schmitz
Measuring "Access To Justice" In The Rush To Digitize, Amy J. Schmitz
Faculty Publications
Access to Justice (A2J) is the hot topic of the day, energizing Twitter and judges alike. Meanwhile, professors and policymakers join in song, singing the praises of online dispute resolution (ODR) as means for expanding A21. This is because ODR uses technology to allow for online claim diagnosis, negotiation, and mediation without the time, money, and stress of traditional court processes. Indeed, courts are now moving traffic ticket, condominium, landlord/tenant, personal injury, debt collection, and even divorce claims online. The hope is that online triage and dispute resolution systems will provide means for obtaining remedies for self-represented litigants (SRLs) and …
The Emerging Statutory Proximate Cause Doctrine, Sandra F. Sperino
The Emerging Statutory Proximate Cause Doctrine, Sandra F. Sperino
Faculty Publications
The year 2011 marked the birth of a new idea. The United States decided Staub v. Proctor Hospital and for the first time invoked common law proximate cause in the context of federal employment discrimination law. It is rare in jurisprudence to be present at the birth of an idea and then see that idea develop over its first decade. This Article charts the emerging proximate cause doctrine from its early days as a baby doctrine. Now, the doctrine is pre-adolescent, with all of the changes and turmoil that phrase entails.
Assumptions About Terrorism And The Brandenburg Incitement Test, Christina E. Wells
Assumptions About Terrorism And The Brandenburg Incitement Test, Christina E. Wells
Faculty Publications
The incitement standard announced in Brandenburg v. Ohio is one of the most familiar tests in the Supreme Court's jurisprudence. It prohibits government officials from punishing advocacy of illegal activity unless it is directed and likely to imminently incite such activity. Brandenburg's standard has become a pillar of free speech law, allowing government officials to protect public safety by punishing only speech intended and likely to create an imminent danger of harm, while protecting even the most abhorrent of speakers from suppression of their speech simply because government officials fear or dislike it. Terrorist advocacy, however, is putting pressure on …
Moving Beyond Medical Debt, Brook E. Gotberg, Michael D. Sousa
Moving Beyond Medical Debt, Brook E. Gotberg, Michael D. Sousa
Faculty Publications
In recent years it has become clear that medical costs are imposing severe financial burdens on American families, sometimes to the point that bankruptcy becomes the only escape from crippling debt. When evaluating the well-established connection between outstanding medical debt and consumer bankruptcy, most existing empirical studies attempt to quantify the percentage of consumer bankruptcies that are "caused" by unmanageable medical indebtedness. This Article addresses what we believe to be a more significant line of empirical inquiry, namely, the connection between health insurance coverage and consumer bankruptcy as a more precise measurement of how national health insurance programs may or …
Caught By The Cat's Paw, Sandra F. Sperino
Caught By The Cat's Paw, Sandra F. Sperino
Faculty Publications
Federal employment discrimination law is enamored with court-created doctrines with catchy names. A fairly recent addition to the canon is the concept of the "cat's paw," formally recognized by the U.S. Supreme Court in Staub v. Proctor Hospital. With its name coined by Judge Richard Posner and drawn from a fable, the concept of cat's paw has taken ground quickly, discussed in hundreds of cases. The Supreme Court recognized the cat's paw theory in a case where a hospital fired a worker. The person who made the ultimate decision did not have impermissible bias. However, her decision was influenced by …
The People V. Their Universities: How Popular Discontent Is Reshaping Higher Education Law, Ben L. Trachtenberg
The People V. Their Universities: How Popular Discontent Is Reshaping Higher Education Law, Ben L. Trachtenberg
Faculty Publications
Surveys taken since 2015 reveal that Americans exhibit stark partisan divisions in their opinions about colleges and universities, with recent shifts in attitudes driving changes to higher education law. In recent years, Democrats have become slightly more positive about higher education. Concurrently, Republicans have become extremely more negative, and a majority of Republicans now tells pollsters that colleges and universities have an overall negative effect on the country.
Particularly in legislative chambers controlled by Republicans, public and elite dissatisfaction with higher education has led to legal interventions into the governance of universities, with new laws related to faculty tenure, the …
#I U: Considering The Context Of Online Threats, Lyrissa Lidsky
#I U: Considering The Context Of Online Threats, Lyrissa Lidsky
Faculty Publications
The United States Supreme Court has failed to grapple with the unique interpretive difficulties presented by social media threats cases. Social media make hateful and threatening speech more common but also magnify the potential for a speaker's innocent words to be misunderstood People speak differently on different social media platforms, and architecturalf eatures ofplatforms, such as character limits, affect the meaning of speech. The same is true of other contextual clues unique to social media, such as gifs, hashtags, and emojis. Only by understanding social media contexts can legal decision-makers avoid overcriminalization of speech protected by the First Amendment. This …
Sexual Harassment Of Low-Income Women In Housing: Pilot Study Results, Rigel C. Oliveri
Sexual Harassment Of Low-Income Women In Housing: Pilot Study Results, Rigel C. Oliveri
Faculty Publications
In recent months, high-profile and influential figures in media, government, and entertainment have been brought down by credible allegations that they have engaged in sexual misconduct. These revelations have sparked an important national discussion about the prevalence of sexual harassment in American society and the ways in which powerful people can use their positions both to exploit their vulnerable targets and to escape the consequences of their actions.
The conversation is a necessary starting point, but the focus on high-status workplaces overlooks other contexts in which sexual harassment occurs. This Article focuses on one overlooked, significant national problem: the sexual …
Crime, Punishment, And Causation: The Effect Of Etiological Information On The Perception Of Moral Agency, Paul J. Litton, Philip Robbins
Crime, Punishment, And Causation: The Effect Of Etiological Information On The Perception Of Moral Agency, Paul J. Litton, Philip Robbins
Faculty Publications
Moral judgments about a situation are profoundly shaped by the perception of individuals in that situation as either moral agents or moral patients (Gray & Wegner, 2009; Gray, Young, & Waytz, 2012), Specifically, the more we see someone as a moral agent, the less we see them as a moral patient, and vice versa. As a result, casting the perpetrator of a transgression as a victim tends to have the effect of making them seem less blameworthy (Gray & Wegner, 201 1). Based on this theoretical framework, we predicted that criminal offenders with a mental disorder that predisposes them to …
There's An "App" For That: Developing Online Dispute Resolution To Empower Economic Development, Amy J. Schmitz
There's An "App" For That: Developing Online Dispute Resolution To Empower Economic Development, Amy J. Schmitz
Faculty Publications
Traditionally, litigation has been the norm for resolving disputes. It takes place in a public forum and face-to-face. In a global economy, however, such public and face-to-face dispute resolution is not feasible. This is especially true with cross-border purchases through e-commerce. E-commerce requires more efficient and less litigious remedy systems that allow consumers to obtain remedies on their purchases without the cost and travel associated with traditional face-to-face procedures. This has led to development of online dispute resolution (“ODR”) processes, especially with respect to business-to-consumer contracts. Accordingly, scholarship and policy papers have advanced ODR for the benefit of consumers. What …
The 2015 University Of Missouri Protests And Their Lessons For Higher Education Policy And Administration, Ben L. Trachtenberg
The 2015 University Of Missouri Protests And Their Lessons For Higher Education Policy And Administration, Ben L. Trachtenberg
Faculty Publications
In the tradition of legal narrative and storytelling, this Article explores how the University of Missouri managed to fare so badly after students began protesting during the fall of 2015. It draws upon both public sources and the author's own observations as a faculty leader. The Article reviews the details and context of the Missouri protests and then presents a case study of crisis management and conflict resolution gone awry. Applying observations about higher education policy and administration to the phenomenon of student protests - particularly those related to race - the Article identifies potential pitfalls for university administrators and …
How University Title Ix Enforcement And Other Discipline Processes (Probably) Discriminate Against Minority Students, Ben L. Trachtenberg
How University Title Ix Enforcement And Other Discipline Processes (Probably) Discriminate Against Minority Students, Ben L. Trachtenberg
Faculty Publications
This Article argues that university discipline procedures likely discriminate against minority students and that increasingly muscular Title IX enforcement - launched with the best of intentions in response to real problems - almost certainly exacerbates yet another systemic barrier to racial justice and equal access to educational opportunities. Unlike elementary and secondary schools, universities do not keep publicly available data on the demographics of students subjected to institutional discipline, which prevents evaluation of possible disparate racial impact in higher education. Further, several aspects of the university disciplinary apparatus-including broad and vague definitions of offenses, limited access to legal counsel, and …
The New Handshake: Where We Are Now, Amy J. Schmitz, Colin Rule
The New Handshake: Where We Are Now, Amy J. Schmitz, Colin Rule
Faculty Publications
The internet has empowered consumers in new and exciting ways. It has opened more efficient avenues for consumers to buy just about anything. Want proof? Just pull out your smartphone, swipe your finger across the screen a few times, and presto – your collector’s edition Notorious RBG bobblehead is on its way from China. Unfortunately, however, the internet has not yet delivered on its promise to improve consumer protection.
Limiting The Collective Right To Exclude, Andrea Boyack
Limiting The Collective Right To Exclude, Andrea Boyack
Faculty Publications
For decades, society’s disparate interests and priorities have stymied attempts to resolve issues of housing affordability and equity. Zoning law and servitude law, both of which have been robustly empowered by decades of jurisprudence, effectively grant communities the legal right and ability to exclude various sorts of residences from their wealthiest neighborhoods. Exclusion by housing type results in exclusion of categories of people, namely, renters, the relatively poor, and racial minorities. Although our society’s housing woes may indeed be intractable if we continue to treat a group’s right to exclude with the level of deference that such exclusionary efforts currently …
Prenatal Abandonment: 'Horton Hatches The Egg' In The Supreme Court And Thirty-Four States, Mary M. Beck
Prenatal Abandonment: 'Horton Hatches The Egg' In The Supreme Court And Thirty-Four States, Mary M. Beck
Faculty Publications
Under prenatal abandonment theory, fathers can lose their parental rights to nonmarital children if they do not provide prenatal support to the mothers of their children. This is true even if the mothers have not notified the fathers of the pregnancy and if the mothers or fathers are unsure of the fathers' paternity. While this result may seem counterintuitive, it is necessitated by demographic trends. Prenatal abandonment theory has been structured to protect mothers, fathers, and fetuses in response to a number of social factors: the link between pregnancy and increased rates of sexual assault, domestic violence, and domestic homicide; …
Recalibrating The Federal Economic Crime Guideline: An Admiring Rejoinder To Judge Bennett And Friends, Frank O. Bowman Iii
Recalibrating The Federal Economic Crime Guideline: An Admiring Rejoinder To Judge Bennett And Friends, Frank O. Bowman Iii
Faculty Publications
I have read with the greatest pleasure the article on federal white-collar crime sentencing by U.S. District Judge Mark Bennett and Professors Justin Levinson and Koichi Hioki. They review the history of fraud sentencing in the Sentencing Guidelines era, offer a persuasive critique of some deficiencies in the current regime, present the results of their own survey of judicial attitudes toward sentencing a representative fraud case, and propose a series of useful prescriptions for change. Inasmuch as they are kind enough to cite my own work approvingly throughout the article, it will come as no surprise that I agree with …
Zika, Pregnancy, And The Law, Sam F. Halabi
Zika, Pregnancy, And The Law, Sam F. Halabi
Faculty Publications
This Essay situates a crucial component of the public health response to Zika - the effort to develop a safe and effective vaccine - within the broader literature. It does so in an effort to highlight the need to revisit the relationship between law and pregnancy - not only in the areas legal scholars have prioritized so far, but also in the context of routine and emergency maternal health, which has heretofore been largely assumed to be governed by straightforward norms and practices based on medical evidence and physician ethics. In fact, whereas the current literature tends to assume or …
Book Review: Divergent Paths: The Academy And The Judiciary, S. I. Strong
Book Review: Divergent Paths: The Academy And The Judiciary, S. I. Strong
Faculty Publications
Judge Richard Posner's most recent book, Divergent Paths: The Academy and the Judiciary touches on a number of important issues, but the most revolutionary element involves Judge Posner's discussion of how the legal academy can assist with the education of current and future judges.
Book Review: Human Smuggling And Border Crossings, Rachel J. Wechsler
Book Review: Human Smuggling And Border Crossings, Rachel J. Wechsler
Faculty Publications
This is a review of Gabriella Sanchez's monograph, which challenges dominant narratives of human smugglers as violent members of organized criminal networks with qualitative research conducted with smuggling facilitators, their families, and those who utilized their services.
Symposium Introduction: Beyond The Faa: Arbitration Procedure, Practice, And Policy In Historical Perspective, Carli N. Conklin
Symposium Introduction: Beyond The Faa: Arbitration Procedure, Practice, And Policy In Historical Perspective, Carli N. Conklin
Faculty Publications
The Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), enacted in 1925, provides a framework for how we think about arbitration procedure, practice, and policy in the United States today. Yet, the FAA, and the interpretive lens it provides, are relatively new on the horizon, historically speaking
Remedy Realities In Business-To-Consumer Contracting, Amy J. Schmitz
Remedy Realities In Business-To-Consumer Contracting, Amy J. Schmitz
Faculty Publications
Professor Jean Braucher greatly contributed to the exploration of consumer and contract law by questioning how the law operates in the real world and highlighting the importance of “law in action.” In recognition of that contribution, this Article focuses on law in action with respect to consumers’ quest to obtain remedies regarding their business-to-consumers (“B2C”) contracts. Currently, consumers often have no practical recourse with respect to B2C purchase problems due to the complexity, cost, and inconvenience of the processes for obtaining remedies. Accordingly, stated legal rights become meaningless for individuals living in the real world. This Article, therefore, explores access …
A Post-Obergefell America: Is A Season Of Legal And Civic Strife Inevitable?, Carl H. Esbeck
A Post-Obergefell America: Is A Season Of Legal And Civic Strife Inevitable?, Carl H. Esbeck
Faculty Publications
Obergefell v. Hodges did not extend the rigor of the Equal Protection Clause to "sexual orientation" as a protected class. The case is about the right to marry by obtaining a license from the state, not a right to be free of discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. The Court's rhetoric, however, will boost officials eager to take the next step for sexual equality. Not only did Obergefell speak of gays and lesbians as a class and wrote empathetically about them, but in dicta twice said that being gay or lesbian is an immutable characteristic. Accordingly, it can be …
Beyond Disparate Impact: How The Fair Housing Movement Can Move On, Rigel C. Oliveri
Beyond Disparate Impact: How The Fair Housing Movement Can Move On, Rigel C. Oliveri
Faculty Publications
Disparate impact theory is a vital tool for fair housing advocates. It allows them to challenge institutional behaviors that harm minority groups and municipal practices that perpetuate long-standing segregated patterns, without having to go through the difficult process of identifying a specific bad actor with explicitly discriminatory motives. Disparate impact theory has been a failure for fair housing advocates. It is overly complicated, infrequently used, and seldom leads to plaintiff success. Moreover, the availability of this theory has led to the underdevelopment of the law surrounding intentional discrimination, which has ultimately made all cases with circumstantial evidence more difficult to …
Introducing The 'New Handshake' To Expand Remedies And Revive Responsibility In Ecommerce, Amy J. Schmitz
Introducing The 'New Handshake' To Expand Remedies And Revive Responsibility In Ecommerce, Amy J. Schmitz
Faculty Publications
There was a time when individuals would meet in person to make purchases and do deals. They would discuss the terms, assess the trustworthiness and character of their contracting partners, and conclude the deal with a handshake. The handshake helped ensure the enforcement of the deal without need for the rule of law or legal power. That handshake was one’s bond — it was a personal trust mark. With the emergence of eCommerce, however, that handshake has nearly disappeared along with the sense of responsibility it inspired. Accordingly, this article discusses how this has impacted consumers’ access to remedies regarding …
Civility (Part Ii), Douglas E. Abrams
Religious Rights In Historical, Theoretical And International Context: Hobby Lobby As A Jurisprudential Anomaly, S. I. Strong
Religious Rights In Historical, Theoretical And International Context: Hobby Lobby As A Jurisprudential Anomaly, S. I. Strong
Faculty Publications
The United States has a long and complicated history concerning religious rights, and the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decision in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., has done little to clear up the jurisprudence in this field. Although the decision will doubtless generate a great deal of commentary as a matter of constitutional and statutory law, the better approach is to consider whether and to what extent the majority and dissenting opinions reflect the fundamental principles of religious liberty. Only in that context can the merits of such a novel decision be evaluated free from political and other biases.
This …