Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law (133)
- Legal Education (27)
- Legal Writing and Research (18)
- Constitutional Law (15)
- Health Law and Policy (10)
-
- Legal History (10)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (8)
- Law and Society (8)
- Medicine and Health Sciences (8)
- Criminal Law (7)
- Business Organizations Law (6)
- Criminal Procedure (6)
- First Amendment (6)
- Internet Law (6)
- Labor and Employment Law (6)
- Land Use Law (6)
- Law and Gender (6)
- Bioethics and Medical Ethics (5)
- Consumer Protection Law (5)
- Family Law (5)
- International Law (5)
- Law and Economics (5)
- Bankruptcy Law (4)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (4)
- Environmental Law (4)
- Legal Profession (4)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (4)
- Asian Studies (3)
- Election Law (3)
- Intellectual Property Law (3)
- Keyword
-
- Baltimore (4)
- Fifth Amendment (4)
- Health care (4)
- Abuse of discretion (3)
- Due process (3)
-
- Ethics (3)
- Family law (3)
- Statutory interpretation (3)
- Bioethics (2)
- Business law (2)
- Dispute resolution (2)
- Eminent domain (2)
- Jury (2)
- Jury instructions (2)
- Law (2)
- Litigation (2)
- Maryland Law Review (2)
- Medicine (2)
- Nursing (2)
- Seventy-fifth anniversary (2)
- Takings (2)
- Takings Clause (2)
- Takings clause (2)
- 1820 (1)
- 2016 presidential campaign (1)
- 2016 presidential election (1)
- ADR (1)
- AECD (1)
- Activist investors (1)
- Affirmative defenses (1)
- Publication
-
- Maryland Law Review (35)
- Faculty Scholarship (29)
- Journal of Business & Technology Law (21)
- The Sixth Annual Capital Area Legal Writing Conference (19)
- Maryland Carey Law (18)
-
- University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender and Class (18)
- Maryland Journal of International Law (14)
- Legal History Publications (8)
- Maryland Law Review Online (8)
- Court Briefs (6)
- Maryland Series in Contemporary Asian Studies (4)
- Homeland Security Publications (3)
- Mid-Atlantic Ethics Committee Newsletter (3)
- Law & Health Care Newsletter (2)
- Business Law Bulletin (1)
- Commencement Speeches (1)
- Impact Report (1)
- Newsletter (1)
- Proxy (1)
- Speeches (1)
- Student Articles and Papers (1)
- The C-DRUM News (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 196
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
United States V. Klintock: Reconsideration Of United States V. Palmer As To General Piracy As Defined By The Law Of Nations Through The Applicable Standards Of Political Action Of Acknowledgement And Recognition And The Status Of Statelessness, Justin L. Sieffert
Legal History Publications
During the February 1820 Term, the Supreme Court of the United States decided four significant piracy cases, beginning with United States v. Klintock. Political, economic, and social pressures enhanced the problem of piracy affecting the interests of the United States. Responding to the criticism of his decision in United States v. Palmer and the passage of the Act of 1819 state Congressional intent for defining piracy by the “law of nations,” Marshall authored the decision in Klintock distinguishing Palmer and, upon reconsideration, interpreting the Act of 1790 to include general piracy as defined by the “law of nations.” With …
Martin V. Mott And The Establishment Of Executive Emergency Authority, Eli Berns-Zieve
Martin V. Mott And The Establishment Of Executive Emergency Authority, Eli Berns-Zieve
Legal History Publications
In August of 1814, a New York farmer named Jacob E. Mott refused to rendezvous with the militia pursuant to the orders of Governor Daniel D. Tompkins as commanded by President James Madison. In 1818, Mott was court martialed and fined ninety-six dollars. One year later, Mott brought an action in replevin in the New York state courts to recover chattel taken from him by a deputy marshal in lieu of the ninety-six dollars. Both the New York trial and appellate courts sided with Mott. In a unanimous opinion authored by Justice Joseph Story, the Supreme Court of the United …
Willson V. Black-Bird Creek Marsh Co., 25 U.S. 245 (1829): An Early Test Of The Dormant Commerce Clause, Michael P. Collins Jr.
Willson V. Black-Bird Creek Marsh Co., 25 U.S. 245 (1829): An Early Test Of The Dormant Commerce Clause, Michael P. Collins Jr.
Legal History Publications
In 1822, Delaware authorized the Blackbird Creek Marsh Company to bank and drain the Blackbird Creek in New Castle County. Subsequently, Thompson Wilson and others destroyed the structure built by the marsh company. The marsh company subsequently sued Mr. Wilson for the damage to its property. The parties eventually appealed their dispute to the Supreme Court of the United States. The Court held that Delaware’s authorization to bank and dam the creek did not conflict with the federal government’s exclusive authority to regulate commerce between the several states. Ultimately, the Court decided Willson in a manner inconsistent with its earlier …
Brief Of Appellant, Abdullah Malik Joppy A/K/A Richard Joppy V. State Of Maryland, No. 533, Paul Dewolfe, Renée M. Hutchins, Peter Honnef
Brief Of Appellant, Abdullah Malik Joppy A/K/A Richard Joppy V. State Of Maryland, No. 533, Paul Dewolfe, Renée M. Hutchins, Peter Honnef
Court Briefs
No abstract provided.
Brief Of Appellant, Davon Jones V. State Of Maryland, No. 547, Paul Dewolfe, Renée M. Hutchins, Matthew T. Healy
Brief Of Appellant, Davon Jones V. State Of Maryland, No. 547, Paul Dewolfe, Renée M. Hutchins, Matthew T. Healy
Court Briefs
No abstract provided.
Brief Of Appellant, Matthew Bredlow V. State Of Maryland, No. 621, Paul Dewolfe, Renée M. Hutchins, Ardalun Kamali
Brief Of Appellant, Matthew Bredlow V. State Of Maryland, No. 621, Paul Dewolfe, Renée M. Hutchins, Ardalun Kamali
Court Briefs
No abstract provided.
Brief Of Appellant, Mark Andrew Matthews V. State Of Maryland, No. 327, Paul Dewolfe, Renée M. Hutchins, Jesse M. Lachman
Brief Of Appellant, Mark Andrew Matthews V. State Of Maryland, No. 327, Paul Dewolfe, Renée M. Hutchins, Jesse M. Lachman
Court Briefs
No abstract provided.
Is The Supreme Court Disabling The Enabling Act, Or Is Shady Grove Just Another Bad Opera?, Robert J. Condlin
Is The Supreme Court Disabling The Enabling Act, Or Is Shady Grove Just Another Bad Opera?, Robert J. Condlin
Faculty Scholarship
After seventy years of trying, the Supreme Court has yet to agree on whether the Rules Enabling Act articulates a one or two part standard for determining the validity of a Federal Rule. Is it enough that a Federal Rule regulates “practice and procedure,” or must it also not “abridge substantive rights”? The Enabling Act seems to require both, but the Court is not so sure, and the costs of its uncertainty are real. Among other things, litigants must guess whether the decision to apply a Federal Rule in a given case will depend upon predictable ritual, judicial power grab, …
Eugenics, Jim Crow, And Baltimore's Best, Garrett Power
Eugenics, Jim Crow, And Baltimore's Best, Garrett Power
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Brief Of Appellant, John Hill V. State Of Maryland, No. 2740, Paul Dewolfe, Renée M. Hutchins, Silva Georgian
Brief Of Appellant, John Hill V. State Of Maryland, No. 2740, Paul Dewolfe, Renée M. Hutchins, Silva Georgian
Court Briefs
No abstract provided.
Brief Of Appellant, James Goss V. State Of Maryland, No. 669, Paul Dewolfe, Renée M. Hutchins, Lisa M. Johnson
Brief Of Appellant, James Goss V. State Of Maryland, No. 669, Paul Dewolfe, Renée M. Hutchins, Lisa M. Johnson
Court Briefs
No abstract provided.
Interest And Irritation: Brown V. Maryland And The Making Of A National Economy, Henry P. Callegary
Interest And Irritation: Brown V. Maryland And The Making Of A National Economy, Henry P. Callegary
Legal History Publications
This paper examines the United States Supreme Court case Brown v. Maryland, 25 U.S. (12 Wheat.) 419 (1827), which struck down Maryland’s licensing fee on wholesalers of imported goods. In doing so, the Court reaffirmed its commitment to a national economic policy, instead of a state-centric system. This paper explores the context of the decision, including profiles of the parties involved, the attorneys for both sides, the lower court decisions, and the majority opinion and dissent from the United States Supreme Court. Additionally, this paper follows the lineage of the case through to the present day, examining its doctrinal impact …
A Tribute To The Honorable Glenn T. Harrell, Jr., Mary Ellen Barbera, James A. Kenney Iii, Steven I. Platt, Robert A. Zarnoch
A Tribute To The Honorable Glenn T. Harrell, Jr., Mary Ellen Barbera, James A. Kenney Iii, Steven I. Platt, Robert A. Zarnoch
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Nonmarriage, June Carbone, Naomi Cahn
Nonmarriage, June Carbone, Naomi Cahn
Maryland Law Review
Now that the Supreme Court has reshaped the laws of marriage, attention is shifting to nonmarriage. The law no longer treats intimate couples who do not marry as either deviant or deprived. Yet, rather than regulate nonmarriage in a systematic way, the law applies two inconsistent doctrines to govern these relationships. This Article is the first to explore the fundamental contradiction in the legal approach to unmarried partners. While the laws governing financial obligations between unmarried couples are moving toward a deregulatory model that radically differs from the status-based regulation of marriage, the laws of custody and support insist on …
The Influence Of Exile, Sara K. Rankin
The Influence Of Exile, Sara K. Rankin
Maryland Law Review
Belonging is a fundamental human need, but human instincts are Janus-faced and equally strong is the drive to exclude. This exclusive impulse, which this Article calls “the influence of exile,” reaches beyond interpersonal dynamics when empowered groups use laws and policies to restrict marginalized groups’ access to public space. Jim Crow, Anti-Okie, and Sundown Town laws are among many notorious examples. But the influence of exile perseveres today: it has found a new incarnation in the stigmatization and spatial regulation of visible poverty, as laws that criminalize and eject visibly poor people from public space proliferate across the nation. These …
The Intellectual Property Hostage In Trade Retaliation, Sarah R. Wasserman Rajec
The Intellectual Property Hostage In Trade Retaliation, Sarah R. Wasserman Rajec
Maryland Law Review
Intellectual property law has become bound up in a debate about appropriate remedies for violations of the World Trade Organization Agreement. As an alternative to traditional countermeasures that consist of retaliation under the violated agreement, the World Trade Organization “(WTO”) contemplates that violations of one of its covered agreements may be remedied through “cross-retaliation,” or retaliation under another agreement. One form of cross-retaliation has garnered interest in recent years: the threat to suspend intellectual property rights in response to unrelated trade violations.
Cross-retaliation through intellectual property rights suspension is theoretically appealing for its potential to avoid problems inherent in traditional …
Singled Out, Michael Pappas
Singled Out, Michael Pappas
Maryland Law Review
David has been “singled out.” He is the only one in his neighborhood legally prohibited from building a house. In a town full of residences, his lot alone must remain vacant. This is unequal, but is it unconstitutional?
Courts have continually grappled with this sort of question, vigilantly defending against unfair and unjust singling out. So important is this concern that the Supreme Court has emphasized it as the heart of the Fifth Amendment takings jurisprudence, and an entire Equal Protection doctrine has emerged around it.
However, courts and scholars have yet to critically examine the concept of singling-out, and …
A Proud Maryland Law Review Alumnus Looks Back, Richard D. Bennett
A Proud Maryland Law Review Alumnus Looks Back, Richard D. Bennett
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Tribute To The Honorable Lynn A. Battaglia, Mary Ellen Barbera, Andrea Leahy, Thomas E. Lynch Iii, William L. Reynolds
A Tribute To The Honorable Lynn A. Battaglia, Mary Ellen Barbera, Andrea Leahy, Thomas E. Lynch Iii, William L. Reynolds
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Armstrong Evolution, Michael Pappas
The Armstrong Evolution, Michael Pappas
Maryland Law Review Online
No abstract provided.
Mid-Atlantic Ethics Committee Newsletter, Fall 2016
Mid-Atlantic Ethics Committee Newsletter, Fall 2016
Mid-Atlantic Ethics Committee Newsletter
No abstract provided.
Law And Health Care Newsletter, Vol. 24, No. 1, Fall 2016
Law And Health Care Newsletter, Vol. 24, No. 1, Fall 2016
Law & Health Care Newsletter
No abstract provided.
Honor Roll Of Donors, 2015-2016
Business Law Bulletin, Fall 2016
Constitution Day Lectures, Maxwell L. Stearns, Paula A. Monopoli, Larry S. Gibson, Robert Koulish, David J. Maher
Constitution Day Lectures, Maxwell L. Stearns, Paula A. Monopoli, Larry S. Gibson, Robert Koulish, David J. Maher
Maryland Law Review Online
No abstract provided.
2016 State Of The Law School, Donald B. Tobin
Remarks At The University Of Maryland Francis King Carey School Of Law Commencement, Tom Perez
Remarks At The University Of Maryland Francis King Carey School Of Law Commencement, Tom Perez
Commencement Speeches
No abstract provided.