Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
Articles 1 - 30 of 391
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Mutually Assured Democracy: Cooperating Under The Compact Clause To Combat Partisan Gerrymandering, Samuel P. Leroy
Mutually Assured Democracy: Cooperating Under The Compact Clause To Combat Partisan Gerrymandering, Samuel P. Leroy
University of Chicago Law Review
No abstract provided.
Weak-Willed Legislatures And Statutory Interpretation, Helen Zhao
Weak-Willed Legislatures And Statutory Interpretation, Helen Zhao
University of Chicago Law Review
Not all statutes are created equal. Contributing to the literature on “super statutes,” I suggest that an analogy to the philosophical concept of weakness of will can illuminate circumstances under which some statutes ought to stand above others. Analogizing to philosopher Richard Holton’s account of weak will, I develop an account in which some statutes express long-term commitments, are intended to foreclose future deliberation, and enact reasons into the law. Such statutes have the status of what Holton calls “resolutions.” Like an individual resolving to stop eating meat, yet finding themself unable to resist, Congress can be weak willed when …
Adolescents In The Justice System: A Progress Report On The Restatement Of Children And The Law, Richard J. Bonnie
Adolescents In The Justice System: A Progress Report On The Restatement Of Children And The Law, Richard J. Bonnie
University of Chicago Law Review
Professor Elizabeth Scott, the chief reporter of the American Law Institute’s (ALI) Restatement of Children and the Law,1 has often observed that the nation’s widespread commitment to juvenile justice reform in the twenty-first century should be grounded in two premises: (1) the laws and practices of the juvenile justice system must be grounded in and guided by evolving knowledge about adolescent development; and (2) youth-serving institutions, including the justice system, must collaborate to erase substantial racial disparities in intervention, discipline, and punishment.2 This Symposium will explore the current draft of the Restatement of Children and the Law with …
Some Thoughts On A Developmental Approach To A Sound Basic Education, Goodwin Liu
Some Thoughts On A Developmental Approach To A Sound Basic Education, Goodwin Liu
University of Chicago Law Review
No abstract provided.
Protecting Children's Access To A Sound Basic Education In The Age Of Political Polarization, A Comment On Goodwin Liu And Kristine Bowman's Essays On Children's Education In The Restatement, Emily Buss
University of Chicago Law Review
Justice Goodwin Liu and Professor Kristine Bowman have taken two very different approaches in their essays commenting on the Restatement’s1 coverage of the law governing children’s education. In Some Thoughts on a Developmental Approach to a Sound Basic Education,2 Justice Liu focuses near exclusively on the Restatement’s articulation of the core educational standard, the “sound basic education,” and presses for an expanded application of that standard to children from birth through young adulthood.3 In The New Parents’ Rights Movement, Education, and Equality,4 Bowman addresses the entire structure of the educational provisions of the Restatement, which straddle …
Decarcerating Immigrant Detainee Medical Care: A Path To Doctrinal Redemption, Kieran Dosanjh
Decarcerating Immigrant Detainee Medical Care: A Path To Doctrinal Redemption, Kieran Dosanjh
University of Chicago Law Review
Government detention is a quid pro quo: the government may deprive persons of their physical liberty, but in exchange, it owes them a level of care. The critical question is, how much care does the Constitution require the government to provide? In a series of federal judicial decisions (collectively, the detainee medical care doctrine), courts have found that the Constitution requires different standards of care for different classes of government detainees. These courts’ standard of care for immigrant detainees is erroneous. Modern U.S. immigration detention’s descriptive resemblance to criminal confinement has prompted courts to (wrongly) find that immigrant detainees are …
Seizure Or Due Process? Section 1983 Enforcement Against Pretrial Detention Caused By Fabricated Evidence, Jorge Pereira
Seizure Or Due Process? Section 1983 Enforcement Against Pretrial Detention Caused By Fabricated Evidence, Jorge Pereira
University of Chicago Law Review
Can an individual who was held in pretrial detention but not criminally convicted as a result of fabricated evidence raise a due process claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983? The answer is unclear. In 2017, the Supreme Court in Manuel v. City of Joliet held that claims for unlawful pretrial detention are governed by the Fourth Amendment. Since then, the Seventh Circuit has asserted that the Fourth Amendment is the only source of redress under § 1983 for wrongful pretrial detention caused by fabricated evidence. By contrast, several circuits have opined that Manuel does not foreclose the possibility that individuals …
Prosecutors, Race, And The Criminal Pipeline, Hannah Shaffer
Prosecutors, Race, And The Criminal Pipeline, Hannah Shaffer
University of Chicago Law Review
This Article presents evidence that some state prosecutors use their discretion to reduce racial disparities in criminal sentences. This finding challenges the prevailing view that prosecutors compound disparities. Given prosecutors’ positions as mediators in a sequential system, this Article analyzes how prosecutors respond to disparities they inherit from the past—and interprets their impacts in light of the accumulated disparities that already exist when they first open their case files. Specifically, I estimate how the sentencing penalty for prior convictions differs by defendant race using North Carolina state court records from 2010 to 2019. I find that the increase in the …
Vagueness And Federal-State Relations, Joel S. Johnson
Vagueness And Federal-State Relations, Joel S. Johnson
University of Chicago Law Review
This Article aims to clarify the content of the void-for-vagueness doctrine and defend its historical pedigree by drawing attention to a fundamental aspect of the Supreme Court’s vagueness decisions—that vagueness analysis significantly depends on whether the law at issue is a federal or state law. That simple distinction has considerable explanatory power. It reveals that the doctrine emerged in the late nineteenth century in response to two simultaneous changes in the legal landscape— first, the availability of Supreme Court due process review of state penal statutes under the Fourteenth Amendment, and second, a significant shift in how state courts construed …
Droughts Of Compassion: The Enduring Problem With Compassionate Release And How The Sentencing Commission Can Address It, Nathaniel Berry
Droughts Of Compassion: The Enduring Problem With Compassionate Release And How The Sentencing Commission Can Address It, Nathaniel Berry
University of Chicago Law Review
Compassionate release, guided by 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), allows a district court to reduce a previously imposed criminal sentence if “extraordinary and compelling reasons” warrant a reduction. Congress delegated the task of describing what constitutes an extraordinary and compelling reason to the U.S. Sentencing Commission. Following the passage of the First Step Act of 2018, most circuit courts held the Commission’s policy statement describing extraordinary and compelling reasons inapplicable, and that until the Commission updated its policy statement, courts enjoyed the discretion to determine what circumstances justify compassionate release.
e. Many have celebrated this newfound discretion and its potential to …
The Fourth Amendment Without Police, Shawn E. Fields
The Fourth Amendment Without Police, Shawn E. Fields
University of Chicago Law Review
What role will the Fourth Amendment play in a world without police? As academics, activists, and lawmakers explore alternatives to traditional law enforcement, it bears asking whether the amendment primarily tasked with regulating police investigations would also regulate postpolice public safety agencies. Surprisingly, the answer is often no. Courts are reluctant to recognize protections from government searches or seizures outside criminal investigations, and they are even more reluctant to require probable cause or a warrant for such conduct. Thus, by removing most public safety functions outside the criminal sphere, abolitionists also move intrusive government conduct outside these traditional strictures and …
The Joint Venture Exception In The International Silver Platter Doctrine: Variability And Devaluation Of Cooperation, Jacqueline Pecaro
The Joint Venture Exception In The International Silver Platter Doctrine: Variability And Devaluation Of Cooperation, Jacqueline Pecaro
University of Chicago Law Review
This Comment examines the joint venture exception in the international silver platter doctrine in the context of the use of wiretaps in federal narcotics cases. Under the international silver platter doctrine, evidence obtained through searches (like wiretaps) by foreign law enforcement on foreign soil and under foreign law is admissible in U.S. courts. The joint venture exception qualifies the international silver platter doctrine: if participation by U.S. law enforcement in a wiretap by foreign law enforcement on foreign soil constitutes a joint venture, then evidence obtained from the search is admissible only if the wiretap was reasonable under the Fourth …
Reducing Prejudice Through Law: Evidence From Experimental Psychology, Sara Emily Burke, Roseanna Sommers
Reducing Prejudice Through Law: Evidence From Experimental Psychology, Sara Emily Burke, Roseanna Sommers
University of Chicago Law Review
Can antidiscrimination law effect changes in public attitudes toward minority groups? Could learning, for instance, that employment discrimination against people with clinical depression is legally prohibited cause members of the public to be more accepting toward people with mental health conditions? In this Article, we report the results of a series of experiments that test the effect of inducing the belief that discrimination against a given group is legal (versus illegal) on interpersonal attitudes toward members of that group. We find that learning that discrimination is unlawful does not simply lead people to believe that an employer is more likely …
The Visibility Trap, Kate Redburn
The Visibility Trap, Kate Redburn
University of Chicago Law Review
In August 2021, the Indiana Court of Appeals prohibited a transgender teenage boy (H.S.) from changing the gender marker on his birth certificate. Because he was fifteen at the time, his parents had filed the petition on his behalf.1 As his parents testified, changing the gender marker on a young trans person’s birth certificate is more than a formality. It makes it possible for them to obtain a passport and driver’s license that match their identity, helping to avoid incongruities in gender regulation that can run the gambit from confusing to dangerous.2
The appellate panel was split. Legally …
Untangling The Prison Mailbox Rules, Mario Ramirez
Untangling The Prison Mailbox Rules, Mario Ramirez
University of Chicago Law Review
Unlike typical litigants, pro se prisoners are unable to deliver filings to court or to have an attorney do so on their behalf. Such prisoners are forced to rely on their prisons’ mailing systems to file documents, which often results in those documents reaching the court after the applicable deadlines. Accordingly, the Supreme Court created a “prison mailbox rule” in Houston v. Lack, under which some filings by prisoners are considered filed when they are given to prison officials for mailing, rather than when they reach the court.
Defining the exact reach of that prison mailbox rule has created considerable …
Kids Are Not So Different: The Path From Juvenile Exceptionalism To Prison Abolition, Emily Buss
Kids Are Not So Different: The Path From Juvenile Exceptionalism To Prison Abolition, Emily Buss
University of Chicago Law Review
Inspired by the Supreme Court’s embrace of developmental science in a series of Eighth Amendment cases, “kids are different” has become the rallying cry, leading to dramatic reforms in our response to juvenile crime designed to eliminate the incarceration of children and support their successful transition to adulthood. The success of these reforms represents a promising start, but the “kids are different” approach is built upon two flaws in the Court’s developmental analysis that constrain the reach of its decisions and hide the true implications of a developmental approach. Both the text of the Court’s opinions and the developmental and …
The Law And Economics Of Animus, Andrew T. Hayashi
The Law And Economics Of Animus, Andrew T. Hayashi
University of Chicago Law Review
People sometimes want to harm other people. This truism points to a blind spot in law and economics scholarship, which generally assumes that people are indifferent to the effects of their actions on other people. Diverse areas of the law, such as hate-crime legislation and constitutional equal protection doctrine, reside in this blind spot because they are premised on the existence of animus. I argue that the assumption of indifference unnecessarily limits law and economics analysis and that it is both possible and fruitful to incorporate animus into law and economics. I show that doing so leads to new insights …
Experimental Jurisprudence, Kevin Tobia
Experimental Jurisprudence, Kevin Tobia
University of Chicago Law Review
“Experimental jurisprudence” draws on empirical methods to inform questions typically associated with jurisprudence and legal theory. Scholars in this flourishing movement conduct empirical studies about a variety of legal language and concepts. Despite the movement’s growth, its justification is still opaque. Jurisprudence is the study of deep and longstanding theoretical questions about law’s nature, but “experimental jurisprudence,” it might seem, simply surveys laypeople. This Article elaborates on and defends experimental jurisprudence. Experimental jurisprudence, appropriately understood, is not only consistent with traditional jurisprudence; it is an essential branch of it.
Neither Here Nor There: Wire Fraud And The False Binary Of Territoriality Under Morrison, Jason Petty
Neither Here Nor There: Wire Fraud And The False Binary Of Territoriality Under Morrison, Jason Petty
University of Chicago Law Review
No abstract provided.
Symposium Introduction: This Violent City? Urban Violence In Chicago And Beyond, Aziz Z. Huq, John Rappaport
Symposium Introduction: This Violent City? Urban Violence In Chicago And Beyond, Aziz Z. Huq, John Rappaport
University of Chicago Law Review
To many, the city of Chicago conjures up a specter of unremitting urban violence. In 2014, the city was labeled the “murder capital” of the United States.1 The following year, a video of the police shooting Laquan McDonald became a cynosure of public concern.2 Commentators as disparate as Spike Lee and President Donald Trump agree: Chicago is uniquely bloody.3 Predictably, the empirical data about Chicago’s crime and policing trends belie the most dramatic of these claims.4 Yet if Chicago is not as violent as either Lee or Trump makes it out to be, the city’s experience …
The Enduring Neighborhood Effect, Everyday Urban Mobility, And Violence In Chicago, Robert J. Sampson, Brian L. Levy
The Enduring Neighborhood Effect, Everyday Urban Mobility, And Violence In Chicago, Robert J. Sampson, Brian L. Levy
University of Chicago Law Review
A longstanding tradition of research linking neighborhood disadvantage to higher rates of violence is based on the characteristics of where people reside. This Essay argues that we need to look beyond residential neighborhoods to consider flows of movement throughout the wider metropolis. Our basic premise is that a neighborhood’s well-being depends not only on its own socioeconomic conditions but also on the conditions of neighborhoods that its residents visit and are visited by—connections that form through networks of everyday urban mobility. Based on the analysis of large-scale urban-mobility data, we find that while residents of both advantaged and disadvantaged neighborhoods …
Neighborhood Inequality And Violence In Chicago, 1965–2020, Patrick Sharkey, Alisabeth Marsteller
Neighborhood Inequality And Violence In Chicago, 1965–2020, Patrick Sharkey, Alisabeth Marsteller
University of Chicago Law Review
This Essay analyzes trends in violence from a spatial perspective, focusing on how changes in the murder rate are experienced by communities and groups of residents within the city of Chicago. The Essay argues that a spatial perspective is essential to understanding the causes and consequences of violence in the United States and begins by describing the social policies and theoretical mechanisms that explain the connection between concentrated disadvantage and violent crime.
The analysis expands on a long tradition of research in Chicago, and it studies the distribution of violence in the city’s neighborhoods from 1965 to 2020. It additionally …
Capitalizing On Crisis: Chicago Policy Responses To Homicide Waves, 1920–2016, Robert Vargas, Chris Williams, Phillip O’Sullivan, Christina Cano
Capitalizing On Crisis: Chicago Policy Responses To Homicide Waves, 1920–2016, Robert Vargas, Chris Williams, Phillip O’Sullivan, Christina Cano
University of Chicago Law Review
This Essay investigates Chicago city-government policy responses to the four largest homicide waves in its history: 1920–1925, 1966–1970, 1987–1992, and 2016. Through spatial and historical methods, we discover that Chicago police and the mayor’s office misused data to advance agendas conceived prior to the start of the homicide waves. Specifically, in collaboration with mayors, the Chicago Police Department leveraged its monopoly over crime data to influence public narratives over homicide in ways that repeatedly (1) delegitimized Black social movements, (2) expanded policing, (3) framed homicide as an individual rather than systemic problem, and (4) exclusively credited police for homicide rate …
Racially Territorial Policing In Black Neighborhoods, Elise C. Boddie
Racially Territorial Policing In Black Neighborhoods, Elise C. Boddie
University of Chicago Law Review
This Essay explores police practices that marginalize Black people by limiting their freedom of movement across the spaces of Black neighborhoods. In an earlier article, I theorized “racial territoriality” as a form of discrimination that “excludes people of color from—or marginalizes them within—racialized White spaces that have a racially exclusive history, practice, and/or reputation.” In this Essay, I consider how my theory of racial territoriality could apply to policing. It offers an ac-count of how police not only criminalize Black people but also criminalize Black spaces, ostensibly justifying them—and the people who live in or frequent them—as “natural” targets for …
Identifying And Measuring Excessive And Discriminatory Policing, Alex Chohlas-Wood,, Marissa Gerchick, Sharad Goel, Aziz Z. Huq, Amy Shoemaker, Ravi Shroff, Keniel Yao
Identifying And Measuring Excessive And Discriminatory Policing, Alex Chohlas-Wood,, Marissa Gerchick, Sharad Goel, Aziz Z. Huq, Amy Shoemaker, Ravi Shroff, Keniel Yao
University of Chicago Law Review
We describe and apply three empirical approaches to identify superfluous police activity, unjustified racially disparate impacts, and limits to regulatory interventions. First, using cost-benefit analysis, we show that traffic and pedestrian stops in Nashville and New York City disproportionately impacted communities of color without achieving their stated public-safety goals. Second, we address a long-standing problem in discrimination research by presenting an empirical approach for identifying “similarly situated” individuals and, in so doing, quantify potentially unjustified disparities in stop policies in New York City and Chicago. Finally, taking a holistic view of police contact in Chicago and Philadelphia, we show that …
An Abolitionist Critique Of Violence, Allegra Mcleod
An Abolitionist Critique Of Violence, Allegra Mcleod
University of Chicago Law Review
The violence experienced by young people of color in the city is multidimensional—both interpersonal and structural. So many of the young have to swallow their rage as they are surveilled in stores and on the streets, as they are targeted by cops for endless stops and frisks, as they are denied jobs, as their schools are closed, and as they are locked in cages by the thousands. For some, the violations and the deprivation turn outward. The instrumental use of violence by some young people becomes a rational adaptive strategy in response to racial and economic oppression. For some of …
Textual Rules In Criminal Statutes, Joshua Kleinfeld
Textual Rules In Criminal Statutes, Joshua Kleinfeld
University of Chicago Law Review
No abstract provided.
On Prisoners, Politics, And The Administration Of Criminal Justice: Professor Rachel Barkow, Sonja B. Starr
On Prisoners, Politics, And The Administration Of Criminal Justice: Professor Rachel Barkow, Sonja B. Starr
University of Chicago Law Review
Professor Rachel Barkow has established herself as an indispensable voice in public and academic discourse on criminal justice reform. Beyond the very important contributions to the world of scholarship that earned her a well-deserved place in this “most-cited” list, she has also shaped policy directly (most notably as a member of the U.S. Sentencing Commission from 2013 to 2018), as well as influenced the education of countless law students through her coauthorship of the leading criminal law casebook.1 She is also an expert on administrative law and on the separation of powers, and this shapes her distinct perspective on the …
Guido Calabresi’S “Other Justice Reasons”, Adam Davidson
Guido Calabresi’S “Other Justice Reasons”, Adam Davidson
University of Chicago Law Review
No abstract provided.
Tribe’S Trajectory & Lgbtq Rights, Joshua Matz
Tribe’S Trajectory & Lgbtq Rights, Joshua Matz
University of Chicago Law Review
I’m not sure I’ll ever live it down. I actually said—out loud, to his face, a full ten minutes into our very first conversation—“Holy smokes, you’re Larry Tribe!” I was in Cambridge that day as a newly admitted student. Somehow, inexplicably (it’s not that big of a campus), I got lost. Very lost. Fortunately, a passerby professor took mercy and steered me to his office. In a bid to regain my composure, and to seem like a plausible future law student, I jumped straight to explaining why I was there: I wanted to be a civil rights lawyer. To prove …