Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- Civil rights (2)
- Supreme Court (2)
- Supreme court (2)
- Title VII (2)
- 11 USC 726(a)(4) (1)
-
- AALS (1)
- ABA Commission on Women in the Profession (1)
- Allegheny Pittsburgh (1)
- Allegheny Pittsburgh Coal Co. v. County Commission (1)
- Ansonia (1)
- Ansonia Board of Education v. Philbrook (1)
- Antitrust (1)
- Assessment (1)
- Assessment real property (1)
- Attorneys fees (1)
- Attorneys' fees (1)
- Bankruptcy (1)
- Bankruptcy code (1)
- Brener (1)
- CR (1)
- Citizen complaints (1)
- City of new york (1)
- Civil Rights Act of 1964 (1)
- Civil rights act of 1964 (1)
- Civil rights fee-shifting (1)
- Civil rights litigation (1)
- Collective bargaining (1)
- Constructive (1)
- Constructive realization (1)
- Constructively (1)
Articles 1 - 9 of 9
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
The Admissibility Of Evidence Protected By Noerr-Pennington, Michael Lewyn
The Admissibility Of Evidence Protected By Noerr-Pennington, Michael Lewyn
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
On Constructively Realizing Constructive Realization: Building The Case For Death And Taxes, Dan Subotnik
On Constructively Realizing Constructive Realization: Building The Case For Death And Taxes, Dan Subotnik
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
The Law Schools, Howard A. Glickstein
Evening The Odds: The Case For Attorneys' Fee Awards For Administrative Resolution Of Title Vi And Title Vii Disputes, Marjorie A. Silver
Evening The Odds: The Case For Attorneys' Fee Awards For Administrative Resolution Of Title Vi And Title Vii Disputes, Marjorie A. Silver
Scholarly Works
In this Article Professor Silver addresses the shifting of attorneys' fees in administratively resolved claims under Titles VI and VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Professor Silver begins by establishing Congress' commitment to provide informal methods for resolving disputes under these statutes and its intent to use fee-shifting provisions as a means of inducing effective access to counsel. She then discusses the United States Supreme Court's decision in North Carolina Department of Transportation v. Crest Street Community Council, Inc. and contrasts its reasoning with two earlier Court decisions dealing with administrative proceedings and attorneys' fees. Professor Silver argues …
Introduction (The Supreme Court & Local Government Law: The 1988-89 Term), Leon D. Lazer
Introduction (The Supreme Court & Local Government Law: The 1988-89 Term), Leon D. Lazer
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
After The Fall: The Employer's Duty To Accommodate Employee Religious Practices Under Title Vii After Ansonia Board Of Education V. Philbrook, Peter Zablotsky
After The Fall: The Employer's Duty To Accommodate Employee Religious Practices Under Title Vii After Ansonia Board Of Education V. Philbrook, Peter Zablotsky
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Federal Oil Price Controls In Bankruptcy Cases: Government Claims For Repayment Of Illegal Overcharges Should Not Be Subordinated And “Penalties” Under 11 Usc §726(A)(4), Thomas A. Schweitzer
Federal Oil Price Controls In Bankruptcy Cases: Government Claims For Repayment Of Illegal Overcharges Should Not Be Subordinated And “Penalties” Under 11 Usc §726(A)(4), Thomas A. Schweitzer
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
The Crime Victim’S "Right" To A Criminal Prosecution: A Proposed Model Statute For The Governance Of Private Criminal Prosecution, Peter L. Davis
The Crime Victim’S "Right" To A Criminal Prosecution: A Proposed Model Statute For The Governance Of Private Criminal Prosecution, Peter L. Davis
Scholarly Works
The thesis of this article is that the public prosecutor should to have a monopoly on criminal prosecutions; some supplementary system of private criminal prosecution should be available. Two such systems, or models, currently exist in New York. The first model, available statewide, theoretically allows a complainant to initiate a non-felony criminal prosecution without any screening by a prosecutor or judge. This system is unwise, unworkable and illusory because it obscures the exercise of judicial discretion and focuses the court’s attention on the wrong issues, usually precluding the crime victim’s complaint. The second model, limited by statute to New York …
Section 1983, Martin A. Schwartz, Leon Lazer, George Pratt, Leon Friedman
Section 1983, Martin A. Schwartz, Leon Lazer, George Pratt, Leon Friedman
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.