Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Military, War, and Peace (7)
- Constitutional Law (4)
- National Security Law (4)
- Courts (2)
- International Law (2)
-
- Jurisprudence (2)
- Administrative Law (1)
- Business Organizations Law (1)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
- Communications Law (1)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (1)
- Criminal Law (1)
- Human Rights Law (1)
- Immigration Law (1)
- International Humanitarian Law (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Law and Politics (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Legislation (1)
- President/Executive Department (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 11 of 11
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Pre-Crime Restraints: The Explosion Of Targeted, Non-Custodial Prevention, Jennifer Daskal
Pre-Crime Restraints: The Explosion Of Targeted, Non-Custodial Prevention, Jennifer Daskal
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
This Article exposes the ways in which noncustodial pre-crime restraints have proliferated over the past decade, focusing in particular on three notable examples — terrorism-related financial sanctions, the No Fly List, and the array of residential, employment, and related restrictions imposed on sex offenders. Because such restraints do not involve physical incapacitation, they are rarely deemed to infringe core liberty interests. Because they are preventive, not punitive, criminal law procedural protections do not apply. They have exploded largely unchecked — subject to little more than bare rationality review and negligible procedural protections — and without any coherent theory as to …
After The Aumf, Jennifer Daskal
After The Aumf, Jennifer Daskal
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
Over a dozen years later, the AUMF — which has never been amended — remains the principal source of the U.S. government’s domestic legal authority to use military force against al Qaeda and its associates, both on the battlefields of Afghanistan and far beyond. But even as the statutory framework has remained unchanged, the facts on the ground have evolved dramatically, leading some to call for a new AUMF. In short, calls for a new framework statute to replace the AUMF are unnecessary, provocative, and counterproductive; they perpetuate war at a time when we should be seeking to end it. …
Battlefield Borders, Threat Rhetoric, And The Militarization Of State And Local Law Enforcement, Danielle C. Jefferis
Battlefield Borders, Threat Rhetoric, And The Militarization Of State And Local Law Enforcement, Danielle C. Jefferis
American University National Security Law Brief
No abstract provided.
“Bring[Ing] Our Enemies To Justice”: Terrorism And The Court, Anna Elazan
“Bring[Ing] Our Enemies To Justice”: Terrorism And The Court, Anna Elazan
Legislation and Policy Brief
This article focuses on the venue of Mohammad’s trial and is broken into three sections. The first section reviews the historical use of military tribunals. This section begins by looking at the basis for Presidential authority to authorize the use of military commissions. This section then outlines the first use of military commissions since World War II. President George W. Bush’s authorization parallels the provisions in President Franklin Roosevelt’s authorization of the use of commissions in the 1940s. However, following authorization, the military commissions were subject to judicial challenges and significant revision by Congress. Finally, this section tracks recent developments …
Preempting Justice: Precrime In Fiction And In Fact, Mark Niles
Preempting Justice: Precrime In Fiction And In Fact, Mark Niles
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
No abstract provided.
The Long War, The Federal Courts, And The Necessity / Legality Paradox, Stephen I. Vladeck
The Long War, The Federal Courts, And The Necessity / Legality Paradox, Stephen I. Vladeck
Book Reviews
This paper is a solicited review of Ben Wittes's book "Law and the Long War: The Future of Justice in the Age of Terror," which rightly suggests that there would be far less legal uncertainty today vis-a-vis the conduct of the war on terrorism had the Bush Administration sought - and had Congress provided - framework legislation governing issues ranging from the detention of "enemy combatants" to surveillance and even interrogation.
Nevertheless, the review takes issue with Wittes's critique of the role of the courts thus far, especially his contention that the Supreme Court's decisions to date may be seen …
The Assumptions Behind The Assumptions In The War On Terror: Risk Assessment As An Example Of Foundational Disagreement In Counterterrorism Policy, Kenneth Anderson
The Assumptions Behind The Assumptions In The War On Terror: Risk Assessment As An Example Of Foundational Disagreement In Counterterrorism Policy, Kenneth Anderson
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
This 2007 article (based around an invited conference talk at Wayne State in early 2007) addresses risk assessment and cost benefit analysis as mechanisms in counterterrorism policy. It argues that although policy is often best pursued by agreeing to set aside deep foundational differences, in order to obtain a strategic plan for an activity such as counterterrorism, foundational differences must be addressed in order that policy not merely devolve into a policy minimalism that is always and damagingly tactical, never strategic, in order to avoid domestic democratic political conflict. The article takes risk assessment in counterterrorism, using cost benefit analysis, …
The Cost Of Confusion: Resolving Ambiguities In Detainee Treatment, Kenneth Anderson
The Cost Of Confusion: Resolving Ambiguities In Detainee Treatment, Kenneth Anderson
Reports
This short policy paper considers US counterterrorism policy with particular attention to treatment of detainees in matters of challenging detention, interrogation, trial of detainees, and release. It analyzes the existing US war on terror and considers future policies that would address both national security concerns and human rights/civil liberties concerns. The paper is written by two experts and advocates in counterterrorism-related issues, coming from the center right and the center left in American politics, as part of a project of the Stanley Foundation, Bridging the Foreign Policy Divide, which publishes papers by pairs of experts coming from conservative and progressive …
Our Forgotten Colony: Puerto Rico And The War On Drugs, Leeann O'Neill, Jennifer Gumbrewicz
Our Forgotten Colony: Puerto Rico And The War On Drugs, Leeann O'Neill, Jennifer Gumbrewicz
The Modern American
No abstract provided.
Forfeiting "Enduring Freedom" For "Homeland Security": A Constitutional Analysis Of The Usa Patriot Act And The Justice Department's Anti-Terrorism Initiatives , John W. Whitehead, Steven H. Aden
Forfeiting "Enduring Freedom" For "Homeland Security": A Constitutional Analysis Of The Usa Patriot Act And The Justice Department's Anti-Terrorism Initiatives , John W. Whitehead, Steven H. Aden
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
When Justice Goes To War: Prosecuting Terrorists Before Military Commissions, Robert K. Goldman, Diane Orentlicher
When Justice Goes To War: Prosecuting Terrorists Before Military Commissions, Robert K. Goldman, Diane Orentlicher
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
No abstract provided.