Digital Commons Network^™

Closing The Barn Door After The Genie Is Out Of The Bag: Recognizing A "Futility Principle" In First Amendment Jurisprudence, Eric Easton

All Faculty Scholarship

This article argues for a simple proposition: the First Amendment imposes a presumption against the suppression of speech when suppression would be futile. Suppression is futile when the speech is available to the same audience through some other medium or at some other place. The government can overcome this presumption of futility only when it asserts an important interest that is unrelated to the content of the speech in question, and only when the suppression directly advances that interest.

In Part I, the article explores the role that this unarticulated "futility principle" has played in Supreme Court and other decisions …

Are Twelve Heads Better Than One?, Phoebe Ellsworth

Law Quadrangle (formerly Law Quad Notes)

An analysis of mock jury deliberations indicated that juries could competently evaluate facts, weed out errors, and focus on important issues. However the jurors' understanding of the law and how to apply it was substantially inferior to their understanding of the facts and issues.

This article has been condensed with permission from one originally published in Law and Contemporary Problems, Vol. 52, No. 4. Most reference citations have been deleted. For a fully-footnoted copy of the original article, please contact the LQN editor.

Few advocates of the jury system would argue that the average juror as competent a tribunal as …

Sustainable Use Of Natural Resources: A Native American Perspective, Ted Strong

Sustainable Use of the West's Water (Summer Conference, June 12-14)

27 pages.

Contains footnotes.

Positivism And Antipositivism In Federal Courts Law, Michael Wells

Scholarly Works

What is the proper role of rules in federal courts law? Some scholars associated with the Legal Process assert that rules are unimportant here. They believe that the values of principled adjudication and reasoned elaboration should take precedence over the making and application of rules. The area is, in the jargon of jurisprudence, "antipositivist." Others maintain that rules do, or at any rate should, count heavily in federal courts' decisionmaking. In this Article, I argue that Legal Process scholars are right to spurn formalism in most parts of federal courts law. But the Legal Process model of federal courts law …

Beyond Gender: Peremptory Challenges And The Roles Of The Jury, Nancy S. Marder

All Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Beyond Gender: Peremptory Challenges And The Roles Of The Jury, Nancy S. Marder

Nancy S. Marder

No abstract provided.

Eye On Justice, Roger J. Miner '56

Legal History

No abstract provided.

Federalization: A Critical Overview, William P. Marshall

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

1995-96 Supreme Court Preview: Mock Arguments In Romer V. Evans, Michael J. Gerhardt, Tracey Maclin

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Judicial Selection In The People’S Democratic Republic Of Pennsylvania: Here The People Rule?, Harry L. Witte

Harry L Witte

No abstract provided.

A Permanent International Criminal Court: A Proposal That Overcomes Past Objections, Sandra L. Jamison

Denver Journal of International Law & Policy

No abstract provided.

Constitutional Options For A Democratic South Africa, Achim Köddermann

Denver Journal of International Law & Policy

No abstract provided.

De Stadshoven Van De Premonstratenzer Abdijen In De Nederlanden: Refuge, Overslagplaats En Stedelijke Residentie, Workgroup On Norbertine History In The Low Countries

Workgroup on Norbertine History in the Low Countries. Proceedings of their meetings.

The City Courts of the Premonstratensian Abbeys in the Low Countries: Refuge, Transfer Sites, and Urban Residence

Workgroup on Norbertine History in the Low Countries

The Werkgroep Norbertijner Geschiedenis publications are the proceedings from the annual gathering of those interested in the rich history of the Premonstratensian Order in the Low Countries (Belgium, Luxembourg and the Netherlands). Each year a different aspect of this rich and multi-faceted history is explored.

Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanisms: Experience In The United States, Whitmore Gray

Other Publications

The objective of this portion of our conference on judicial reform is to discuss means to promote swift and fair resolution of disputes. Although much of our discussion will center on reform of basic court systems and civil procedure in various countries, my particular focus is on alternatives to traditional institutions and techniques. These alternatives include a variety of what we might call "courtannexed" procedures, that is, procedures that occur during the course of traditional litigation. I will also consider, however, other procedures that might better be characterized as purely "private" techniques for resolving disputes—those that occur before or at …

Busting The Hart & Wechsler Paradigm, Michael L. Wells

Scholarly Works

Federal Courts law was once a vibrant area of scholarship and an essential course for intellectually ambitious students. Now its prestige has diminished so much that scholars debate its future in a recent issue of the Vanderbilt Law Review, where even one of its champions calls it (albeit in the subjunctive mood) a “scholarly backwater.” What, if anything, went wrong, and what should Federal Courts scholars do about it? In his contribution to the Vanderbilt symposium, Richard Fallon defends the reigning model of Federal Courts law, an approach to jurisdictional issues that dates from the publication in 1953 of Henry …

United States V. Gaudin: A Decision With Material Impact, Jeffrey Saks

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.

Reporter’S Draft For The Working Group On Principles To Use When Considering The Federalization Of Criminal Law, Sara Sun Beale

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Grand Jury

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.

Justice Stephen Breyer: Purveyor Of Common Sense In Many Forums, Jeffrey Lubbers

Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals

No abstract provided.

"Mixture Or Substance": Continuing Disparity Under The Federal Sentencing Guidelines Section 2d1.1, Eric J. Stockel

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.

Dunwody Distinguished Lecture In Law: The Values Of Federalism, Erwin Chemerinsky

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Too Many And Yet Too Few: New Principles To Define The Proper Limits For Federal Criminal Jurisdiction, Sara Sun Beale

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

What's Quality Got To Do With It?: Constitutional Theory, Politics, And Education Reform, Phil Weiser

Publications

No abstract provided.

Appellate Determinacy: The Sentencing Philosophy Of The United States Court Of Appeals For The Third Circuit, Gary S. Gildin

Faculty Scholarly Works

No abstract provided.