Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 8 of 8
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Does The Bible Endorse Moral Vegetarianism?, Timothy Eves
Does The Bible Endorse Moral Vegetarianism?, Timothy Eves
Between the Species
No abstract provided.
Rawls And Non-Rational Beneficiaries, Carlo Filice
Rawls And Non-Rational Beneficiaries, Carlo Filice
Between the Species
No abstract provided.
Animals And The Ethics Of Domination, Charles K. Fink
Animals And The Ethics Of Domination, Charles K. Fink
Between the Species
No abstract provided.
Thoreau And The Animals, Wendell O'Brien
On The Moral Status Of Humanized Chimeras And The Concept Of Human Dignity, An Ravelingien, Johan Braeckman, Mike Legge
On The Moral Status Of Humanized Chimeras And The Concept Of Human Dignity, An Ravelingien, Johan Braeckman, Mike Legge
Between the Species
Recent advances in the technology of creating chimeras have evoked controversy in policy debates. At centre of controversy is the fear that a substantial contribution of human cells or genes in crucial areas of the animal’s body may at some point render the animal more humanlike than any other animals we know today. Authors who have commented on or contributed to policy debates specify that chimeras which would be too humanlike would have an altered moral status and threaten our notion of ‘human dignity’. This setting offers a productive opportunity to test the notion of human dignity and to emphasize …
Undermining Indirect Duty Theories, Robert Bass
Undermining Indirect Duty Theories, Robert Bass
Between the Species
No abstract provided.
The Ethical And Aesthetic Defense Of Animal Analogs: A Reply To Turner, Eric B. Litwack
The Ethical And Aesthetic Defense Of Animal Analogs: A Reply To Turner, Eric B. Litwack
Between the Species
Susan M. Turner (2005) has argued that the use of animal analogs ought to be considered categorically unethical on deontological, or rights-grounds, and that some but not all animal analogs are unethical on utilitarian grounds. I claim, on the contrary, that the use of most, if not all animal analogs can be justified from both the utilitarian and animal rights perspectives. Indeed, I believe that a convincing case is to be made for the thesis that animal analogs ought to be promoted actively, on ethical grounds. I hold this to be true of both food and clothing replacement analogs, although …
On The Status Of Vermin, Stephen M. Young