Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Environmental Law (1)
- Environmental Policy (1)
- Environmental Sciences (1)
- Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law (1)
- Legislation (1)
-
- Natural Resources Law (1)
- Natural Resources Management and Policy (1)
- Natural Resources and Conservation (1)
- Oil, Gas, and Energy (1)
- Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law (1)
- Physical Sciences and Mathematics (1)
- Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration (1)
- Public Policy (1)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (1)
- Sustainability (1)
- Water Law (1)
- Water Resource Management (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Justice And Natural Resources: Concepts, Strategies, And Applications, Kathryn M. Mutz, Gary C. Bryner, Douglas S. Kenney
Justice And Natural Resources: Concepts, Strategies, And Applications, Kathryn M. Mutz, Gary C. Bryner, Douglas S. Kenney
Books, Reports, and Studies
This digital resource contains only an abstract, cover image and table of contents information from the published book.
Print copy of book is available in the University of Colorado's Wise Law Library: http://128.138.161.92/record=b257401
Contents: PART ONE : FRAMEWORKS: Beyond "traditional" environmental justice / David H. Getches, David N. Pellow -- Assessing claims of environmental justice : conceptual frameworks / Gary C. Bryner -- Water, poverty, equity, and justice in Colorado : a pragmatic approach / James l. Wescoat Jr., Sarah Halvorson, Lisa Headington, Jill Replogle -- International environmental protection : human rights and North-South divide / Tseming Yang -- PART …
The Strategic Alternative: How State Takings Statutes May Resolve The Unanswered Questions Of Palazzolo, Michael A. Culpepper
The Strategic Alternative: How State Takings Statutes May Resolve The Unanswered Questions Of Palazzolo, Michael A. Culpepper
University of Richmond Law Review
In a world of "Hobbesian stick[s]" and "Lockean bundle[s]," analytical confusion should be expected. Indeed, critics describe the world of federal takings jurisprudence as "an unworkable muddle," as "a jumble of confusing holdings," and as a body of law existing in "doctrinal and conceptual disarray." Since the United States Supreme Court first considered the regulatory takings issue in Mugler v. Kansas, the Court's inconsistent application of the doctrine has largely conformed to criticism. Governed by abstruse metaphors' and ad hoc analysis, the Court acknowledges its imprecision 9 and often relies upon it.