Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Antitrust (5)
- Law (3)
- SSRN (3)
- University of Chicago Law Review (2)
- Administrative law (1)
-
- Anti-monopoly (1)
- Antimonopoly (1)
- Antitrust law (1)
- Business law (1)
- Chicago School (1)
- Comparative Law (1)
- Competition Law (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Corporate governance (1)
- Corporate law (1)
- Corporations (1)
- Economic concentration (1)
- Error Costs (1)
- FTC rulemaking (1)
- Facebook (1)
- False Acquittals (1)
- False Convictions (1)
- False Negatives (1)
- False Positives (1)
- Federal Trade Commission (FTC) (1)
- Federalism (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- First amendment (1)
- Harvard Law Review (1)
- IBM litigation (1)
Articles 1 - 11 of 11
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
In Defense Of Breakups: Administering A “Radical” Remedy, Rory Van Loo
In Defense Of Breakups: Administering A “Radical” Remedy, Rory Van Loo
Faculty Scholarship
Calls for breaking up monopolies—especially Amazon, Facebook, and Google—have largely focused on proving that past acquisitions of companies like Whole Foods, Instagram, and YouTube were anticompetitive. But scholars have paid insufficient attention to another major obstacle that also explains why the government in recent decades has not broken up a single large company. After establishing that an anticompetitive merger or other act has occurred, there is great skepticism of breakups as a remedy. Judges, scholars, and regulators see a breakup as extreme, frequently comparing the remedy to trying to “unscramble eggs.” They doubt the government’s competence in executing such a …
Error Costs, Ratio Tests, And Patent Antitrust Law, Keith N. Hylton, Wendy Xu
Error Costs, Ratio Tests, And Patent Antitrust Law, Keith N. Hylton, Wendy Xu
Faculty Scholarship
This paper examines the welfare tradeoff between patent and antitrust law. Since patent and antitrust law have contradictory goals, the question that naturally arises is how one should choose between the two in instances where there is a conflict. One sensible approach to choosing between two legal standards, or between proof standards with respect to evidence, is to consider the relative costs of errors. The approach in this paper is to consider the ratio of false positives to false negatives in patent antitrust. We find that the relevant error cost ratio for patent antitrust is the proportion of the sum …
Tech Dominance And The Policeman At The Elbow, Tim Wu
Tech Dominance And The Policeman At The Elbow, Tim Wu
Faculty Scholarship
One school of thought takes much of law and the legal system as essentially irrelevant to the process of technological evolution. This view takes as axiomatic that the rate technological change is always accelerating, that any firm or institution dependent on a given technology is therefore doomed to a rapid obsolescence. Law, at best, risks interfering with a natural progression toward a better technological future, hindering “the march of civilization.”
This paper discusses the historical role of antitrust investigation in changing the course of technological development by focusing on the example of the IBM litigation (1969 - 1984). While widely …
The Race To The Middle, William Magnuson
The Race To The Middle, William Magnuson
Faculty Scholarship
How does federalism affect the quality of law? It is one of the fundamental questions of our constitutional system. Scholars of federalism generally fall into one of two camps on the question. One camp argues that regulatory competition between states leads to a “race to the bottom,” in which states adopt progressively worse laws in order to pander to powerful constituencies. The other camp, conversely, argues that regulatory competition leads to a “race to the top,” incentivizing states to adopt progressively better laws in the search for more desirable outcomes for their constituencies. Despite their apparent differences, however, both the …
Nascent Competitors, C. Scott Hemphill, Tim Wu
Nascent Competitors, C. Scott Hemphill, Tim Wu
Faculty Scholarship
A nascent competitor is a firm whose prospective innovation represents a serious threat to an incumbent. Protecting such competition is a critical mission for antitrust law, given the outsized role of unproven outsiders as innovators and the uniquely potent threat they often pose to powerful entrenched firms. In this Article, we identify nascent competition as a distinct analytical category and outline a program of antitrust enforcement to protect it. We make the case for enforcement even where the ultimate competitive significance of the target is uncertain, and explain why a contrary view is mistaken as a matter of policy and …
The End Of Antitrust History Revisited, Lina M. Khan
The End Of Antitrust History Revisited, Lina M. Khan
Faculty Scholarship
This Review engages Tim Wu’s book, The Curse of Bigness, to explain the significance of the current rupture in antitrust and to situate it within a broader intellectual trajectory. Debates over the foundational purpose of antitrust are not new, and examining how this latest clash fits alongside previous contestations is essential for understanding what has yielded the current contestability and assessing the competing visions.
Part I of this Review summarizes Wu’s chief contributions in his recent work, focusing on three tenets that form the basis of the book. Part II offers an analytic breakdown of the overhaul in antitrust …
The Case For "Unfair Methods Of Competition" Rulemaking, Rohit Chopra, Lina M. Khan
The Case For "Unfair Methods Of Competition" Rulemaking, Rohit Chopra, Lina M. Khan
Faculty Scholarship
A key feature of antitrust today is that the law is developed entirely through adjudication. Evidence suggests that this exclusive reliance on adjudication has failed to deliver a predictable, efficient, or participatory antitrust regime. Antitrust litigation and enforcement are protracted and expensive, requiring extensive discovery and costly expert analysis. In theory, this approach facilitates nuanced and fact-specific analysis of liability and well-tailored remedies. But in practice, the exclusive reliance on case-by-case adjudication has yielded a system of enforcement that generates ambiguity, drains resources, privileges incumbents, and deprives individuals and firms of any real opportunity to participate in the process of …
Antitrust & Corruption: Overruling Noerr, Tim Wu
Antitrust & Corruption: Overruling Noerr, Tim Wu
Faculty Scholarship
We live in a time when concerns about influence over the American political process by powerful private interests have reached an apogee, both on the left and the right. Among the laws originally intended to fight excessive private influence over republican institutions were the antitrust laws, whose sponsors were concerned not just with monopoly, but also its influence over legislatures and politicians. While no one would claim that the antitrust laws were meant to be comprehensive anti-corruption laws, there can be little question that they were passed with concerns about the political influence of powerful firms and industry cartels.
Since …
The Curse Of Bigness: New Deal Supplement, Tim Wu
The Curse Of Bigness: New Deal Supplement, Tim Wu
Faculty Scholarship
This is a supplement to the book, The Curse of Bigness: Antitrust in the New Gilded Age. It covers the years between 1920 - 1945, with a focus on the New Deal, and represents material left out of the original book.
It is meant to be read together with the larger volume, but can also be read separately.
The Chicago School’S Limited Influence On International Antitrust, Anu Bradford, Adam S. Chilton, Filippo Maria Lancieri
The Chicago School’S Limited Influence On International Antitrust, Anu Bradford, Adam S. Chilton, Filippo Maria Lancieri
Faculty Scholarship
Beginning in the 1950s, a group of scholars primarily associated with the University of Chicago began to challenge many of the fundamental tenants of antitrust law. This movement, which became known as the Chicago School of Antitrust Analysis, profoundly altered the course of American antitrust scholarship, regulation, and enforcement. What is not known, however, is the degree to which Chicago School ideas influenced the antitrust regimes of other countries. By leveraging new datasets on antitrust laws and enforcement around the world, we empirically explore whether ideas embraced by the Chicago School diffused internationally. Our analysis illustrates that many ideas explicitly …
Preventing The Bad From Getting Worse: The End Of The World (Trade Organization) As We Know It?, Bernard Hoekman, Petros C. Mavroidis
Preventing The Bad From Getting Worse: The End Of The World (Trade Organization) As We Know It?, Bernard Hoekman, Petros C. Mavroidis
Faculty Scholarship
Recent survey evidence and proposals made in long-running negotiations to improve WTO dispute settlement procedures illustrate that many stakeholders believe the system needs improvement. The Appellate Body crisis could have been avoided but for the use of consensus as WTO working practice. Resolving the crisis should prove possible because the matter mostly concerns a small number of more powerful WTO members. We make several proposals to revitalize the WTO appellate function but argue that unless the WTO becomes a locus for new rulemaking, re-establishing the appellate function will not prevent a steady decline in the salience of the organization. A …