Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Institution
Articles 1 - 8 of 8
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Of Wigs, Wickets, And Moonshine: Leadership Development Lessons From An International Collaboration, Douglas A. Blaze
Of Wigs, Wickets, And Moonshine: Leadership Development Lessons From An International Collaboration, Douglas A. Blaze
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Poverty, Privacy, And Living Out Of Reach [Reviews], Wendy A. Bach
Poverty, Privacy, And Living Out Of Reach [Reviews], Wendy A. Bach
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Tennessee's For Profit Benefit Corporation Act: Will More Regulation Achieve The Desired Results, Brian Krumm
Tennessee's For Profit Benefit Corporation Act: Will More Regulation Achieve The Desired Results, Brian Krumm
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Tracing The Roots Of The Criminalization Of Poverty [Reviews], Wendy A. Bach
Tracing The Roots Of The Criminalization Of Poverty [Reviews], Wendy A. Bach
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
“Law &” Meets “Law As”, Linda L. Berger
“Law &” Meets “Law As”, Linda L. Berger
Scholarly Works
Prof. Berger reviews The Handbook of Law and Society, edited by Austin Sarat and Patrick Ewick.
Access To Justice: What To Do About The Law Of Wills, Iris Goodwin
Access To Justice: What To Do About The Law Of Wills, Iris Goodwin
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Iqbal, Twombly, And The Lessons Of The Celotex Trilogy, Hillel Y. Levin
Iqbal, Twombly, And The Lessons Of The Celotex Trilogy, Hillel Y. Levin
Scholarly Works
This Essay compares the Twombly/Iqbal line of cases to the Celotex trilogy and suggests that developments since the latter offer lessons for the former. Some of the comparisons are obvious: decreased access and increased judicial discretion. However, one important similarity has not been well understood: that the driving force in both contexts has been the lower courts rather than the Supreme Court. Further, while we can expect additional access barriers to be erected in the future, our focus should be on lower courts, rather than other institutional players, as the likely source of those barriers.
"Sociological Legitimacy" In Supreme Court Opinions, Michael Wells
"Sociological Legitimacy" In Supreme Court Opinions, Michael Wells
Scholarly Works
Analysis of a Supreme Court opinion ordinarily begins from the premise that the opinion is a transparent window into the Court's thinking, such that the reasons offered by the Court are, or ought to be, the reasons that account for the holding. Scholars debate the strength of the Court's reasoning, question or defend the Court's candor, and propose alternative ways of justifying the ruling. This Article takes issue with the transparency premise, on both descriptive and normative grounds. Especially in controversial cases, the Court is at least as much concerned with presenting its holding in a way that will win …