Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Digital Commons Network

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 2 of 2

Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network

Subsequent Event Risk In Individuals With Established Coronary Heart Disease, Riyaz S. Patel, Vinicius Tragante, Amand F. Schmidt, Raymond O. Mccubrey, Michael V. Holmes, Laurence J. Howe, Kenan Direk, Axel Åkerblom, Karin Leander, Salim S. Virani Apr 2019

Subsequent Event Risk In Individuals With Established Coronary Heart Disease, Riyaz S. Patel, Vinicius Tragante, Amand F. Schmidt, Raymond O. Mccubrey, Michael V. Holmes, Laurence J. Howe, Kenan Direk, Axel Åkerblom, Karin Leander, Salim S. Virani

Office of the Provost

Background: The Genetics of Subsequent Coronary Heart Disease (GENIUS-CHD) consortium was established to facilitate discovery and validation of genetic variants and biomarkers for risk of subsequent CHD events, in individuals with established CHD.
Methods: The consortium currently includes 57 studies from 18 countries, recruiting 185 614 participants with either acute coronary syndrome, stable CHD, or a mixture of both at baseline. All studies collected biological samples and followed-up study participants prospectively for subsequent events.
Results: Enrollment into the individual studies took place between 1985 to present day with a duration of follow-up ranging from 9 months to 15 years. Within …


Provenance And Risk In Transfer Of Biological Materials, Jane Nielsen, Tania M. Bubela, Don R C. Chalmers, Amber Johns, Linda Kahl, Joanne Kamens, Charles Lawson, John Liddicoat, Rebekah Mcwhirter, Ann Monott Aug 2018

Provenance And Risk In Transfer Of Biological Materials, Jane Nielsen, Tania M. Bubela, Don R C. Chalmers, Amber Johns, Linda Kahl, Joanne Kamens, Charles Lawson, John Liddicoat, Rebekah Mcwhirter, Ann Monott

Office of the Provost

Whereas biological materials were once transferred freely, there has been a marked shift in the formalisation of exchanges involving these materials, primarily through the use of Material Transfer Agreements (MTAs). This paper considers how risk aversion dominates MTA negotiations and the impact it may have on scientific progress. Risk aversion is often based on unwarranted fears of incurring liability through the use of a material or loss of control or missing out on commercialisation opportunities. Evidence to date has suggested that complexity tends to permeate even straightforward transactions despite extensive efforts to implement simple, standard MTAs. We argue that in …