Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Digital Commons Network

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

PDF

Jesse Carter Opinions

Spousal support

Publication Year

Articles 1 - 6 of 6

Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network

Herda V. Herda [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter Mar 1957

Herda V. Herda [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

Termination of an ex-husband's support obligations to his ex-wife and to his children was appropriate because the ex-wife had remarried and the parties' children had reached the age of majority.


County Of Contra Costa V. Lasky, Jesse W. Carter Oct 1954

County Of Contra Costa V. Lasky, Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

Daughter's sole income was what she received from her former husband for support of herself and child. Thus, alimony should not have been considered in determining her ability to support her mother, and she was not liable for such support.


Dexter V. Dexter [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter Jan 1954

Dexter V. Dexter [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

The wife secured the approval of a separation agreement by the trial court, and after accepting the benefits thereof, she could not seek relief inconsistent with its terms by attempting to modify the monthly payments.


Fox V. Fox [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter Jan 1954

Fox V. Fox [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

It was error to award an ex-wife an increase in alimony and attorney fees under a divorce decree where the alimony provisions of the decree were an integral part of the ex-wife's property settlement agreement with her ex-husband.


Flynn V. Flynn [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter Jan 1954

Flynn V. Flynn [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

Court had continuing jurisdiction to modify support payments even though the separation agreement was only incorporated by reference into the final decree of dissolution. Changed circumstances were not shown to warrant modification.


Smith V. Smith [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter Mar 1953

Smith V. Smith [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

In divorce proceedings, when a wife was awarded nominal alimony despite the waiver of support in the property agreement, the trial court in effect reserved jurisdiction to award substantial alimony if changed circumstances justified an award.