Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
The Problem With Words: Plain Language And Public Participation In Rulemaking, Cynthia R. Farina, Mary J. Newhart, Cheryl Blake
The Problem With Words: Plain Language And Public Participation In Rulemaking, Cynthia R. Farina, Mary J. Newhart, Cheryl Blake
Cynthia R. Farina
This Article, part of the special issue commemorating the fiftieth anniversary of the Administrative Conference of the United States (“ACUS”), situates ACUS’s recommendations for improving public rulemaking participation in the context of the federal “plain language” movement. The connection between broader, better public participation and more comprehensible rulemaking materials seems obvious, and ACUS recommendations have recognized this connection for almost half a century. Remarkably, though, the series of presidential and statutory plain-language directives on this topic have not even mentioned the relationship of comprehensibility to participation until very recently. In 2012, the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (“OIRA”) issued …
Conceiving Due Process, Cynthia R. Farina
Conceiving Due Process, Cynthia R. Farina
Cynthia R. Farina
We seem unable to make peace with procedural due process. To be sure, in the twenty years since Goldberg v. Kelly the Supreme Court has come to speak in the clear, strong tones of doctrinal certainty. It now deals deftly with claims that people have been mishandled by their government, first culling out those who can point to no "entitlement" and then weighing up, for those who remain, just how much process the system can afford. Once-sharp and fundamental debates on the Court about the nature, scope, and purpose of procedural due process in the administrative state have subsided into …