Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Busing To Desegregate Schools: The Perspective From Congress, Hugh Scott
Busing To Desegregate Schools: The Perspective From Congress, Hugh Scott
University of Richmond Law Review
The controversy over transporting pupils to desegregate schools or "busing" as the issue popularly is known, is the narrowest and perhaps most limited aspect of school desegregation. Yet, it threatens to undo school desegregation completely unless the issue is re- solved in a way which will permit continued desegregation of schools accompanied by the understanding and support of the majority of people of all races.
Sex Discrimination In Employment: What Has Title Vii Accomplished For The Female?
Sex Discrimination In Employment: What Has Title Vii Accomplished For The Female?
University of Richmond Law Review
The legislative intent of Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act was to eradicate all forms of discriminatory employment practices based upon race, religion, national origin or sex. While the initial success of accomplishing this goal fell short of what was expected, important strides in recent years have reversed earlier disappointments.
Civil Rights-No State Action Necessary To Prohibit Racial Discrimination By "Private" School
Civil Rights-No State Action Necessary To Prohibit Racial Discrimination By "Private" School
University of Richmond Law Review
Until recently, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1982 were virtually useless as instruments with which to combat purely private racial discrimination. Certainly, one of the principal reasons behind this was the Supreme Court's decision in the Civil Rights Cases wherein the Court restrictively applied the thirteenth amendment, under which the Civil Rights Act of 1866 was enacted. However, in 1968, the Supreme Court ruled that the intention of Congress in enacting the Civil Rights Act of 1866 was to prohibit private racial discrimination as well as racial discrimination under color of law, and thereby vastly broadened the scope of the …
Constitutional Law- Freedom Of Speech- Withdrawal Of Funds From College Newspaper Advocating Segregationist Policy Deemed Violative Of First And Fourteenth Amendment
University of Richmond Law Review
Modern courts have consistently held that the rights of free speech and press provided for in the first amendment are fundamental rights protected by the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment from abridgment by the states. Student expression has been the target of much recent litigation and has prompted increased Supreme Court concern over constitutional aspects of public school administration. The central controversy has developed into a question of how much freedom should be given to a generation that delights in exploring the "limits of institutional response." One of the most piercing probes has been the campus newspaper which …