Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Merhige (5)
- Supreme Court (4)
- History (3)
- Judicial selection (3)
- Bork (2)
-
- Health courts (2)
- Judges (2)
- Justices (2)
- Memoriam (2)
- Politics (2)
- Senate (2)
- Adams (1)
- Alternative Dispute Resolution (1)
- American electorate (1)
- Annual survey (1)
- Bush (1)
- Candidacy (1)
- Capital Sentencing (1)
- Cases (1)
- Civil justice (1)
- Civil rights (1)
- Clinton (1)
- Compassion (1)
- Confirmation (1)
- Confrontation Clause (1)
- Congress (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Courts (1)
- Criminal law (1)
- Criminal procedure (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 26 of 26
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Confronting Death: Sixth Amendment Rights At Capital Sentencing, John G. Douglass
Confronting Death: Sixth Amendment Rights At Capital Sentencing, John G. Douglass
Law Faculty Publications
The Court's fragmentary approach has taken pieces of the Sixth Amendment and applied them to pieces of the capital sentencing process. The author contends that the whole of the Sixth Amendment applies to the whole of a capital case, whether the issue is guilt, death eligibility, or the final selection of who lives and who dies. In capital cases, there is one Sixth Amendment world, not two. In this Article, he argues for a unified theory of Sixth Amendment rights to govern the whole of a capital case. Because both Williams and the Apprendi-Ring-Booker line of cases purport to rest …
Acknowledgments, R. Kennon Poteat
Acknowledgments, R. Kennon Poteat
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Remembering Judge Merhige, Michael W. Smith
Remembering Judge Merhige, Michael W. Smith
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Honorable Robert R. Merhige, Jr.: A Colleague Remembered, Robert E. Payne
The Honorable Robert R. Merhige, Jr.: A Colleague Remembered, Robert E. Payne
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
To Preserve, Protect, And Defend The Constitution Of The United States, Ronald J. Bacigal
To Preserve, Protect, And Defend The Constitution Of The United States, Ronald J. Bacigal
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Reflections: The Honorable Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Gerald L. Baliles
Reflections: The Honorable Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Gerald L. Baliles
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Tribute To Judge Merhige, Orran L. Brown
Tribute To Judge Merhige, Orran L. Brown
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Health Courts: Panacea Or Palliative?, Carl W. Tobias
Health Courts: Panacea Or Palliative?, Carl W. Tobias
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
University Of Richmond Law Review Index Volume Xxxix 2004-2005
University Of Richmond Law Review Index Volume Xxxix 2004-2005
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
How Panels Affect Judges: Evidence From United States District Courts, Ahmed E. Taha
How Panels Affect Judges: Evidence From United States District Courts, Ahmed E. Taha
University of Richmond Law Review
Recent research has shown that judges on panels decide cases differently than they do individually. Understanding these panel effects is essential to understanding and predicting judicial behavior. This Article uses a unique naturalexperiment, and interviewsof United States district court judges who participatedin this ex-periment, to empirically investigate panel effects. Specifically, in fourteen district courts the judges chose to sit in an en banc panelto decide the constitutionalityof the FederalSentencing Guide- lines; in fifty-three other districts, the judges decided the issue in- dividually instead. This Article compares the decisions and the characteristicsof these districts to study how panels affect judicialdecision making …
The Supreme Court: A Unique Institution, John Paul Jones
The Supreme Court: A Unique Institution, John Paul Jones
Law Faculty Publications
Established by the U.S. Constitution in 1789, the Supreme Court is both the final arbiter of significant legal cases and the prevailing authority on the constitutionality of individual laws. While the Constitution specifies the Court's original jurisdiction, it does not spell out how the Court should conduct its business, or even the number of justices who should serve on the Court or what their qualifications should be. Thus, the Founding Fathers provided a High Court for the nation with the adaptability to respond to the needs of its citizens.
No Constitutional Right To A Rubber Stamp, Richard J. Durbin
No Constitutional Right To A Rubber Stamp, Richard J. Durbin
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judicial Confirmation Wars: Ideology And The Battle For The Federal Courts, Sheldon Goldman
Judicial Confirmation Wars: Ideology And The Battle For The Federal Courts, Sheldon Goldman
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Federal Judicial Selection: The First Decade, Maeva Marcus
Federal Judicial Selection: The First Decade, Maeva Marcus
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Bork Was The Beginning: Constitutional Moralism And The Politics Of Federal Judicial Selection, Gary L. Mcdowell
Bork Was The Beginning: Constitutional Moralism And The Politics Of Federal Judicial Selection, Gary L. Mcdowell
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Judicial Nominations Wars, William P. Marshall
The Judicial Nominations Wars, William P. Marshall
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Observations On The Status And Impact Of The Judicial Confirmation Process, Edith H. Jones
Observations On The Status And Impact Of The Judicial Confirmation Process, Edith H. Jones
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Standards Of The Supreme Court, John Cornyn
Standards Of The Supreme Court, John Cornyn
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Debunking Double Standards, John Cornyn
Debunking Double Standards, John Cornyn
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Health Courts: Panacea Or Palliative?, Carl W. Tobias
Health Courts: Panacea Or Palliative?, Carl W. Tobias
Law Faculty Publications
Professor Tobias weighs the pros and cons of legislation proposed in several states that would create "health courts" for the handling of medical malpractice cases.
Crawford V. Washington: Encouraging And Ensuring The Confrontation Of Witness, Robert P. Mosteller
Crawford V. Washington: Encouraging And Ensuring The Confrontation Of Witness, Robert P. Mosteller
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Federal Appellate Court Appointments Conundrum,, Carl W. Tobias
The Federal Appellate Court Appointments Conundrum,, Carl W. Tobias
Law Faculty Publications
Selection of federal appellate court judges is now extremely controversial. Slowed nominee processing, accusations and countercharges between Democrats and Republicans, as well as "paybacks," have characterized appointments since 1990. One tenth of the 179 active circuit judgeships authorized by the United States Congress are perennially vacant, and substantial numbers of these positions can remain open for years. The Senate Judiciary Committee increasingly votes along straight political party lines, and Democratic senators even relied on filibusters to deny nominees positions on the United States Courts of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit as well as the Fourth, Fifth, and Ninth …
Appellate Court Appointments In The Second Bush Administration, Carl W. Tobias
Appellate Court Appointments In The Second Bush Administration, Carl W. Tobias
Law Faculty Publications
Prof. Tobias discusses the renominations by President George W. Bush of twelve candidates for the United States courts of appeals, all previously opposed by Democratic senators during the President's initial term. Likely reasons and predicted consequences for these renominations are offered.
Fourth Circuit Publication Practices, Carl W. Tobias
Fourth Circuit Publication Practices, Carl W. Tobias
Law Faculty Publications
Certain publication practices, especially dependence on issuing unpublished opinions, are one major response of federal courts to the increasing number of appeals. Few observers have assessed how specific tribunals employ these practices, although a recent study elucidates them. The Commission on Structural Alternatives for the Federal Courts of Appeals (Commission) gathered much useful data, which have remained strikingly constant, on each court. Because Fourth Circuit's publication practices and reliance on unpublished decisions allow the court to manage a large docket and suggest that it may not enunciate the common law, this Article scrutinizes those practices.
The Article first describes the …