Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Digital Commons Network

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

PDF

University of Richmond

1982

Board of Regents v. Roth

Articles 1 - 2 of 2

Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network

Figuring Good-Time -- The Postconviction Process, Edward D. Barnes, Guy A. Sibilla Jan 1982

Figuring Good-Time -- The Postconviction Process, Edward D. Barnes, Guy A. Sibilla

University of Richmond Law Review

On July 1, 1981, a new statutory scheme for the administration of parole release became effective in Virginia. Although these new statutes which deal with the system of awarding credits for good conduct are not novel, only two other states, Arkansas and Texas, are reported to have implemented such a scheme. The following article addresses, in a general sense, the parole eligibility and release process in Virginia. This may provide some guidance for practicing attorneys and aid them in representing their clients' interests before the Virginia Parole Board. Additionally, the article reviews the newly introduced good conduct allowance system and …


Due Process Implications Of Prison Transfers, Eugene Murphy Jan 1982

Due Process Implications Of Prison Transfers, Eugene Murphy

University of Richmond Law Review

One of the several anomalies of prison life is the disparate protection afforded inmates transferred to higher security. Although both punitive and administrative transfers often place the inmate in the same building under almost identical conditions, only disciplinary transfers are generally conceded to give rise to due process protection. The inmate confined in isolation for fifteen days as punishment for misconduct is guaranteed a hearing with advance written notice and the rights to present testimony and receive a written decision. On the other hand, the prisoner confined indefinitely in segregation for supposed administrative reasons has such due process rights only …