Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Digital Commons Network

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

PDF

University of New Hampshire

The University of New Hampshire Law Review

2014

Ballot

Articles 1 - 1 of 1

Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network

Disenfranchising America’S Youth: How Current Voting Laws Are Contrary To The Intent Of The Twenty-Sixth Amendment, Sarah Fearon-Maradey Jan 2014

Disenfranchising America’S Youth: How Current Voting Laws Are Contrary To The Intent Of The Twenty-Sixth Amendment, Sarah Fearon-Maradey

The University of New Hampshire Law Review

[Excerpt] “Laws attempting to suppress student voters are not a new advent. Since the Twenty-Sixth Amendment lowered the voting age from twenty-one to eighteen in 1971, states have been passing legislation that has challenged, restricted, and continuously narrowed the eligibility of students to vote. The reasoning behind these laws generally focuses on the belief that student voters dilute the power of permanent resident voters, tend to vote in democratic blocks, and are not sufficiently invested in the community. Regardless of the motivation, these voting laws often have the effect of disenfranchising non-informed students, who either miss the opportunity to vote …