Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 1 of 1
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
False Certainty: Judicial Forcing Of The Quantification Of Risk, Diana R. H. Winters
False Certainty: Judicial Forcing Of The Quantification Of Risk, Diana R. H. Winters
Diana R. H. Winters
Risk, which is by definition only the possibility of harm, is speculative and amorphous. To transform risk into something more concrete and measurable, courts reviewing risk determinations by agencies or individuals in certain contexts will insist that the parties quantify this risk. However, forcing such quantification may undercut the benefits of judicial review. This Article looks at the judicial forcing of the quantification of risk in two contexts: first, the review of agency action, and second, the determination of whether probabilistic injury satisfies the injury-in-fact standing requirement. By juxtaposing these two contexts, the Article illuminates the work that judges think …