Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 8 of 8
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Hirschman V. County Of Los Angeles [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Hirschman V. County Of Los Angeles [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
County civil service employees were not entitled to a declaration that a county oath requirement was invalid because the field of loyalty oath requirements for all county employees was not preempted by statute until adoption of the Levering Act.
Bisno V. Leonard [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Bisno V. Leonard [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
No abstract provided.
Hanchett V. Lehman [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Hanchett V. Lehman [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
Denial of writ of mandate to compel a county to reinstate permanent civil service employees in their jobs after they were discharged for refusing to sign an oath and affidavit, stating which political organizations that they belonged to was proper.
Horowitz V. Conlan [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Horowitz V. Conlan [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
No abstract provided.
Bowen V. County Of Los Angeles [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Bowen V. County Of Los Angeles [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
A former county civil service employee was not entitled to a writ of mandamus to compel the county to reinstate her employment because she refused to execute the loyalty oath that was required of county employees.
Fraser V. Regents Of University Of California [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Fraser V. Regents Of University Of California [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
A former university instructor was not entitled to a writ of mandamus to compel the Regents of the University of California to reinstate him because he refused to take an oath of loyalty that was required of teachers as a condition of employment.
Tolman V. Underhill [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Tolman V. Underhill [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
In California, university personnel could not have properly been required to execute any other oath or declaration relating to loyalty than that prescribed for all state employees.
Pockman V. Leonard [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Pockman V. Leonard [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
College had to pay part, but not all, of professor's salary, which was withheld after he failed to execute oath, because the oath did not violate California's Constitution, but 30 day grace period applied to law, for which he was entitled to payment.