Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Digital Commons Network

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

PDF

Golden Gate University School of Law

Jesse Carter Opinions

1952

Attorney discipline

Articles 1 - 3 of 3

Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network

Feinstein V. State Bar Of California [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter Sep 1952

Feinstein V. State Bar Of California [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

A disbarred attorney who did not conclusively establish his rehabilitation and present good moral character was not reinstated to the practice of law.


Mcmahon V. State Bar Of California [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter Jul 1952

Mcmahon V. State Bar Of California [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

An attorney who misinformed a court about the existence of a will violated the disciplinary rules even if the dispositive provisions of the will were invalid because the will could have validly provided for the appointment of an executor.


Clark V. State Bar Of California [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter Jun 1952

Clark V. State Bar Of California [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

Where attorney acted as guardian of incompetent person and sold the property, negligently retained the funds in an envelope in attorney's safe for over three years, and filed misleading accounts that led to investigation, discipline was merited.