Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Vangel V. Vangel, Jesse W. Carter
Vangel V. Vangel, Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
Judgment in favor of the remaining partners in their dissolution action was affirmed where the decision of the trial court in determining the amount of compensation the faulty partner was entitled to was supported by substantial evidence.
Smith V. Bull, Jesse W. Carter
Smith V. Bull, Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
A partner that dissolved a partnership and took its goodwill, only customer, and employees with him to start a new business was liable to a deceased partner for half of the value of the goodwill because it continued to exist after the dissolution.
Reed V. Norman, Jesse W. Carter
Reed V. Norman, Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
The presence of a defunct corporation in a derivative action could have been dispensed with when the circumstances warranted such an exercise of the court's equitable powers.
Automotriz Del Golfo De California S. A. De C. V. V. Resnick [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Automotriz Del Golfo De California S. A. De C. V. V. Resnick [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
In determining whether the buyers could escape personal liability for debts due to the seller, the trial court was entitled to consider the failure to issue any stock and the buyers' creation and operation of the business with little or no capital.
Financial Indem. Co. V. Superior Court Of Los Angeles County [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Financial Indem. Co. V. Superior Court Of Los Angeles County [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
Where petitioners sought a writ of mandamus to compel the superior court to show cause why respondent should not be restrained from conservatorship, the court lacked jurisdiction to order an injunction on the pleadings.
Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. V. Mcconnell [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. V. Mcconnell [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
Insolvent insurance company was not entitled to mandamus relief against implementation of mutualization plan requiring the company's liquidation, because State law on voluntary mutualization of solvent insurers also applied to an insolvent insurer.
Providence Baptist Church V. Superior Court Of San Francisco, Jesse W. Carter
Providence Baptist Church V. Superior Court Of San Francisco, Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
Nonprofit church corporation and pastors' petition for prohibition against court was denied because the court was entitled to determine whether the church properly terminated the pastor based on a director of corporation analogy.