Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Digital Commons Network

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

PDF

California State University, Monterey Bay

Book Gallery

1968

Accused

Articles 1 - 4 of 4

Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network

La Union Demanda $650.000 En Pleito Y Nixon No Sabe Lo Que Dice: The Union Demands $650,000 In Lawsuit And Nixon Does Not Know What He Is Saying Jan 1968

La Union Demanda $650.000 En Pleito Y Nixon No Sabe Lo Que Dice: The Union Demands $650,000 In Lawsuit And Nixon Does Not Know What He Is Saying

Politicians

El artículo de la izquierda se centra en una demanda que los agricultores presentaron contra sus trabajadores por violar las leyes laborales. Los escritores explican que fue una conspiración contra los trabajadores agrícolas parte de sus esfuerzos antisindicales. En el lado derecho hay varios artículos, uno de los cuales analiza el pago injusto de los trabajadores agrícolas. El otro describe la falta de comprensión del presidente Nixon sobre el boicot y las demandas de los trabajadores agrícolas. (Eng): The article on the left focuses on a lawsuit that growers filed against their workers for violating the labor laws. The writers …


We Are Accused: Framed & Letters To The Editor: Los Acusan Y Cartas Al Editor Jan 1968

We Are Accused: Framed & Letters To The Editor: Los Acusan Y Cartas Al Editor

Activists

Article was written by. Cesar E. Chavez director of the United Farmworkers Union in February 21, 1968. He explains that the movement is falsely accused of violent acts, thus disregarding and misinterpreting the union's goals and action. It explains the anti-strike efforts which were inherently violent against farm workers of all races.


We Are Accused: Framed & Letters To The Editor: Los Acusan Y Cartas Al Editor Jan 1968

We Are Accused: Framed & Letters To The Editor: Los Acusan Y Cartas Al Editor

Subjects

Article was written by. Cesar E. Chavez director of the United Farmworkers Union in February 21, 1968. He explains that the movement is falsely accused of violent acts, thus disregarding and misinterpreting the union's goals and action. It explains the anti-strike efforts which were inherently violent against farm workers of all races.


La Union Demanda $650.000 En Pleito Y Nixon No Sabe Lo Que Dice: The Union Demands $650,000 In Lawsuit And Nixon Does Not Know What He Is Saying Jan 1968

La Union Demanda $650.000 En Pleito Y Nixon No Sabe Lo Que Dice: The Union Demands $650,000 In Lawsuit And Nixon Does Not Know What He Is Saying

Subjects

El artículo de la izquierda se centra en una demanda que los agricultores presentaron contra sus trabajadores por violar las leyes laborales. Los escritores explican que fue una conspiración contra los trabajadores agrícolas parte de sus esfuerzos antisindicales. En el lado derecho hay varios artículos, uno de los cuales analiza el pago injusto de los trabajadores agrícolas. El otro describe la falta de comprensión del presidente Nixon sobre el boicot y las demandas de los trabajadores agrícolas. (Eng): The article on the left focuses on a lawsuit that growers filed against their workers for violating the labor laws. The writers …