Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 8 of 8
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Alimony For Men -- The Changing Law, Pamela Joy Smith
Alimony For Men -- The Changing Law, Pamela Joy Smith
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Fullilove V. Klutznick (Formerly Kreps), Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Fullilove V. Klutznick (Formerly Kreps), Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Rewriting Roe V. Wade, Donald H. Regan
Rewriting Roe V. Wade, Donald H. Regan
Articles
Roe v. Wade is one of the most controversial cases the Supreme Court has decided. The result in the case - the establishment of a constitutional right to abortion - was controversial enough. Beyond that, even people who approve of the result have been dissatisfied with the Court's opinion. Others before me have attempted to explain how a better opinion could have been written. It seems to me, however, that the most promising argument in support of the result of Roe has not yet been made. This essay contains my suggestions for "rewriting" Roe v. Wade
The Unwed Father: Conflict Of Rights In Adoption Proceedings, Winston R. Davis
The Unwed Father: Conflict Of Rights In Adoption Proceedings, Winston R. Davis
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Family Law–Divorce–Constitutionality Of Arkansas Property Settlement And Alimony Statutes, Gordon W. Hawthorne
Family Law–Divorce–Constitutionality Of Arkansas Property Settlement And Alimony Statutes, Gordon W. Hawthorne
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Courts, Congress, And Educational Adequacy: The Equal Protection Predicament, Betsy Levin
The Courts, Congress, And Educational Adequacy: The Equal Protection Predicament, Betsy Levin
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Some Thoughts On Judicial Authority To Repair Unconstitutional Legislation, Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Some Thoughts On Judicial Authority To Repair Unconstitutional Legislation, Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Cleveland State Law Review
Among governing institutions, the judiciary has been described as "the least dangerous branch."' Courts in our system have the awesome power to declare laws unconstitutional, but judges command no troops, and are said to lack the power of the purse. My remarks address a facet of the purse power supposition: When a legislative product is constitutionally infirm because it is under inclusive, what remedies lie within the judicial province? Discussion will focus on the question whether a court may order inclusion of a category of persons left out by the legislature, a question particularly pointed when the court's inclusion order …
Comparative Negligence Versus The Constitutional Guarantee Of Equal Protection: A Hypothetical Judicial Decision, Daniel O. Conkle, Claude R. Sowle
Comparative Negligence Versus The Constitutional Guarantee Of Equal Protection: A Hypothetical Judicial Decision, Daniel O. Conkle, Claude R. Sowle
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.