Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Criminal Law (2)
- Right to Fair and Impartial Trial (2)
- Administration of Criminal Justice (1)
- Branzburg v. Hayes (408 U.S. 665 (1972)) (1)
- Confidential Communications (1)
-
- Due Process of Law (1)
- Entrapment (1)
- Evidence (1)
- Free Exercise Clause (1)
- Journalistic Privilege (1)
- Nebraska Press Ass'n v. Stuart (1)
- Press Law (1)
- Pretrial Publicity (1)
- Religion (1)
- Right of Privacy (1)
- Right to Counsel (1)
- Suppression of Evidence (1)
- United States Consitution 6th Amendment (1)
- United States Constitution 1st Amendment (1)
- United States Constitution 4th Amendment (1)
- United States Constitution 5th Amendment (1)
- United States Constitution 6th Amendment (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Toward An Expanded View Of The Due Process Claim In Entrapment Cases, Paul Marcus
Toward An Expanded View Of The Due Process Claim In Entrapment Cases, Paul Marcus
Paul Marcus
No abstract provided.
The Reporter's Privilege: An Analysis Of The Common Law, Branzberg V. Hayes , And Recent Statutory Developments, Paul Marcus
The Reporter's Privilege: An Analysis Of The Common Law, Branzberg V. Hayes , And Recent Statutory Developments, Paul Marcus
Paul Marcus
No abstract provided.
The Media In The Courtroom: Attending, Reporting, Televising Criminal Cases, Paul Marcus
The Media In The Courtroom: Attending, Reporting, Televising Criminal Cases, Paul Marcus
Paul Marcus
No abstract provided.
The Faretta Principle: Self Representation Versus The Right To Counsel, Paul Marcus
The Faretta Principle: Self Representation Versus The Right To Counsel, Paul Marcus
Paul Marcus
The United States Constitution makes provision for criminal defendants to be represented by counsel. In the federal jurisdiction this principle was vigorously applied, even to indigent persons, very early in the Twentieth Century. The United States Supreme Court, however, was reluctant to impose this requirement on the states except in cases of unusual circumstances where the absence of counsel would have affected the basic fairness of the trial. Finally, in a landmark decision by the Supreme Court, it was held that the right to counsel applies in both federal and state cases. For the past twenty years, federal and state …
The Forum Of Conscience: Applying Standards Under The Free Exercise Clause, Paul Marcus
The Forum Of Conscience: Applying Standards Under The Free Exercise Clause, Paul Marcus
Paul Marcus
The 1973 Supreme Court decision in Wisconsin v. Yoder reenforced and amplified the Court's earlier holding in Sherbert v. Verner that the free exercise clause of the first amendment requires the state to render substantial deference to religiously motivated behavior in the application of its laws and regulatory schemes. In this article, Mr. Marcus traces the evolving standards of free exercise doctrine and observes that the "balancing test" which has resulted from that evolution requires still further refinement to give religious freedom its full constitutional due. The author then illustrates how the new standards of free exercise might be applied …
Restrictions On Law Enforcement Investigation And Prosecution Of Crime, Paul Marcus
Restrictions On Law Enforcement Investigation And Prosecution Of Crime, Paul Marcus
Paul Marcus
No abstract provided.