Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional Law (4)
- Equal Protection (2)
- Administrative Law (1)
- America Invents Act of 2011 (1)
- Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. Winn (131 S. Ct. 1436 (2011)) (1)
-
- Bankruptcy Reorganization (1)
- Circumcision (1)
- Citizenship (1)
- Discrimination Against Gays (1)
- Dodd Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (1)
- Executive Power (1)
- Exemptions (1)
- Financial Risk (1)
- Flast v. Cohen (392 U.S. 83 (1968)) (1)
- Flores-Villar v. United States (131 S. Ct. 2312 (2011)) (1)
- Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (130 S. Ct. 3138 (2010)) (1)
- Gay Adoption (1)
- Immigration Law (1)
- Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (1)
- Lafler v. Cooper (132 S. Ct. 1376 (2012)) (1)
- Lawrence v. Texas (539 U.S. 558 (2003)) (1)
- Manners and Customs (1)
- Militias (1)
- Missouri v. Frye (132 S. Ct. 1399 (2012)) (1)
- Padilla v. Kentucky (130 S. Ct. 1473 (2010)) (1)
- Parent and Child (1)
- Patent Law (1)
- Privacy (1)
- Religion and Law (1)
- Remedies (1)
Articles 1 - 14 of 14
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
On Candor, Free Enterprise Fund, And The Theory Of The Unitary Executive, Michael J. Gerhardt
On Candor, Free Enterprise Fund, And The Theory Of The Unitary Executive, Michael J. Gerhardt
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Calming Unsettled Waters: A Proposal For Navigating The Tenuous Power Divide Between The Federal Courts And The Uspto Under The American Invents Act, William Rose
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Power And Responsibility: Fourth Amendment Limits On The Use Of Molecular Scanners, Paul Wolfgramm Jr.
Power And Responsibility: Fourth Amendment Limits On The Use Of Molecular Scanners, Paul Wolfgramm Jr.
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
What Matters More: A Day In Jail Or A Criminal Conviction?, John P. Gross
What Matters More: A Day In Jail Or A Criminal Conviction?, John P. Gross
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
The Eighth Amendment As A Warrant Against Undeserved Punishment, Scott W. Howe
The Eighth Amendment As A Warrant Against Undeserved Punishment, Scott W. Howe
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
Should the Eighth Amendment prohibit all undeserved criminal convictions and punishments? There are grounds to argue that it must. Correlation between the level of deserts of the accused and the severity of the sanction imposed represents the very idea of justice to most of us. We want to believe that those branded as criminals deserve blame for their conduct and that they deserve all of the punishment they receive. A deserts limitation is also key to explaining the decisions in which the Supreme Court has rejected convictions or punishments as disproportional, including several major rulings in the new millennium. Yet, …
Distinguishing Between Custom And Law: Empirical Examples Of Endogeneity In Property And First Amendment Precedents, Daniel L. Chen, Susan Yeh
Distinguishing Between Custom And Law: Empirical Examples Of Endogeneity In Property And First Amendment Precedents, Daniel L. Chen, Susan Yeh
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
The Dormant Second Amendment: Exploring The Rise, Fall, And Potential Resurrection Of Independent State Militias, Michael J. Golden
The Dormant Second Amendment: Exploring The Rise, Fall, And Potential Resurrection Of Independent State Militias, Michael J. Golden
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
The term “militia” is polarizing, misunderstood, misapplied, and generally difficult for modern Americans to digest. That is not surprising, given the depth and breadth of American militia history and militias’ substantial evolution over four centuries.
Historically, militia simply refers to a broad-based civic duty to protect one’s fellow citizens from internal and external dangers and is not limited to activities involving firearms. Reestablishing militia’s true meaning and purpose—and reinvigorating independent state militias in the United States to effect that purpose—has the potential to address states’ emerging financial and security gaps and to produce multiple other significant benefits, including recalibrating federalism. …
A Winn For Originalism Puts Establishment Clause Reform Within Reach, Patrick T. Gillen
A Winn For Originalism Puts Establishment Clause Reform Within Reach, Patrick T. Gillen
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Crossing The Final Border: Securing Equal Gender Protection In Immigration Cases, Michelle L. Sudano
Crossing The Final Border: Securing Equal Gender Protection In Immigration Cases, Michelle L. Sudano
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Dodd-Frank's Title Ii Authority: A Disorderly Liquidation Of Experience, Logic, And Due Process, Chadwick Welch
Dodd-Frank's Title Ii Authority: A Disorderly Liquidation Of Experience, Logic, And Due Process, Chadwick Welch
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Social Science Studies And The Children Of Lesbians And Gay Men: The Rational Basis Perspective, Carlos A. Ball
Social Science Studies And The Children Of Lesbians And Gay Men: The Rational Basis Perspective, Carlos A. Ball
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
This Article seeks to determine whether the social science literature on the children of lesbians and gay men precludes the government from relying on child welfare considerations to justify same-sex marriage bans and parenting restrictions affecting lesbians and gay men under the highly deferential rational basis test. Under that test, courts must uphold laws and regulations that have any conceivable basis of fact which is rationally related to a legitimate state interest. After comprehensively reviewing the social science literature, the Article concludes that the empirical evidence showing the lack of an association between parental sexual orientation and the psychological and …
Lawrence's Stealth Constitutionalism And Same-Sex Marriage Litigation, Eric Berger
Lawrence's Stealth Constitutionalism And Same-Sex Marriage Litigation, Eric Berger
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
Constitutional law scholarship often focuses on two taxonomies: doctrinal categories and interpretive methodologies. Consequently, constitutional scholars sometimes neglect other important facets of constitutional decisionmaking, particularly extra-doctrinal stealth determinations that courts render frequently in constitutional opinions. The U.S. Supreme Court regularly confronts the questions underlying these determinations, but despite their centrality to constitutional decisionmaking, these issues often escape careful scrutiny.
Lawrence v. Texas exemplifies the phenomenon. Lawrence framed its central question at a broad level of generality; relied on hybrid reasoning, using equal-protection rationales to support a substantive due process holding; declined to identify a level of scrutiny; and invoked changing …
Constitutional Remedies And Public Interest Balancing, John M. Greabe
Constitutional Remedies And Public Interest Balancing, John M. Greabe
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
The conventional account of our remedial tradition recognizes that courts may engage in discretionary public interest balancing to withhold the specific remedies typically administered in equity. But it generally does not acknowledge that courts possess the same power with respect to the substitutionary remedies usually provided at law. The conventional account has things backwards when it comes to constitutional remedies. The modern Supreme Court frequently requires the withholding of substitutionary constitutional relief under doctrines developed to protect the perceived public interest. Yet it has treated specific relief to remedy ongoing or imminent invasions of rights as routine, at least when …
To Cut Or Not To Cut?: Addressing Proposals To Ban Circumcision Under Both A Parental Rights Theory And Child-Centered Perspective In The Specific Context Of Jewish And Muslim Infants, Andrew E. Behrns
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.