Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- ART (3)
- Assisted Reproductive Technology (3)
- Baby Making (3)
- Discrimination (3)
- Judgments (Law) (3)
-
- Prospective Parents (3)
- Surrogacy (3)
- Andrea B. Carroll (2)
- Establishment clause (Constitutional law) (2)
- United States Supreme Court (2)
- 597 F.3d 769 (1)
- Abortion (1)
- Abortion -- Law & legislation (1)
- Accountability (1)
- Appellate courts (1)
- Constitutional Accountability (1)
- Contractors (1)
- Decision making (1)
- Discrimination -- Law & legislation (1)
- Federal courts of law (1)
- Federal government (1)
- Fetal Life (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- Government accountability (1)
- Hosanna-Tabor (1)
- Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & School v. EEOC (1)
- Indiana (1)
- Informed consent (Law) (1)
- Judges (1)
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Discrimination In Baby Making: The Unconstitutional Treatment Of Prospective Parents Through Surrogacy, Andrea B. Carroll
Discrimination In Baby Making: The Unconstitutional Treatment Of Prospective Parents Through Surrogacy, Andrea B. Carroll
Indiana Law Journal
Roundtable on Regulating Assisted Reproductive Technology 2012
How Parents Are Made: A Response To Discrimination In Baby Making: The Unconstitutional Treatment Of Prospective Parents Through Surrogacy, Kimberly M. Mutcherson
How Parents Are Made: A Response To Discrimination In Baby Making: The Unconstitutional Treatment Of Prospective Parents Through Surrogacy, Kimberly M. Mutcherson
Indiana Law Journal
Roundtable on Regulating Assisted Reproductive Technology 2012
"We The People," Constitutional Accountability, And Outsourcing Government, Kimberly N. Brown
"We The People," Constitutional Accountability, And Outsourcing Government, Kimberly N. Brown
Indiana Law Journal
The ubiquitous outsourcing of federal functions to private contractors, although benign in the main, raises the most fundamental of constitutional questions: What institutions and actors comprise the “federal government” itself? From Abu Ghraib to Blackwater, a string of scandals has heightened public awareness that highly sensitive federal powers and responsibilities are routinely entrusted to government contractors. At the same time, the American populace seems vaguely aware that, when it comes to ensuring accountability for errors and abuses of power, contractors occupy a special space. The fact is that myriad structural and procedural means for holding traditionally government actors accountable do …
Hierarchies Of Discrimination In Baby Making: A Response To Professor Carroll, Radhika Rao
Hierarchies Of Discrimination In Baby Making: A Response To Professor Carroll, Radhika Rao
Indiana Law Journal
Roundtable on Regulating Assisted Reproductive Technology 2012
The Sins Of Hosanna-Tabor, Leslie Griffin
The Sins Of Hosanna-Tabor, Leslie Griffin
Indiana Law Journal
The Supreme Court has lost sight of individual religious freedom. In Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & School v. EEOC, the Court for the first time recognized the ministerial exception, a court-created doctrine that holds that the First Amendment requires the dismissal of many employment discrimination cases against religious employers. The Court ruled unanimously that Cheryl Perich, an elementary school teacher who was fired after she tried to return to school from disability leave, could not pursue an antidiscrimination lawsuit against her employer.
This Article criticizes Hosanna-Tabor as a profound misinterpretation of the First Amendment. The Court mistakenly protected religious institutions’ …
Defining Fetal Life: An Establishment Clause Analysis Of Religiously Motivated Informed Consent Provisions, Justin R. Olson
Defining Fetal Life: An Establishment Clause Analysis Of Religiously Motivated Informed Consent Provisions, Justin R. Olson
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Incorporation Of The Establishment Clause Against The States: A Logical, Textual, And Historical Account, Frederick Mark Gedicks
Incorporation Of The Establishment Clause Against The States: A Logical, Textual, And Historical Account, Frederick Mark Gedicks
Indiana Law Journal
Incorporation of the Establishment Clause against the states through the Fourteenth Amendment is logically and textually impossible—so say most academics, a few lower-court judges, and a Supreme Court Justice. They maintain that because the Clause was originally understood as a structural limitation that protected state power against the federal government, it cannot restrain state power or fit within the Fourteenth Amendment texts that protect personal rights— indeed, that attempts to show that it does are laughable.
This purported incoherence and textual inconsistency enable anti-incorporation critics to avoid serious engagement of the anti-establishment dimensions of Reconstruction history. They also undermine the …