Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Digital Commons Network

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

PDF

Constitutional Law

Jesse Carter Opinions

Articles 1 - 9 of 9

Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network

Steinmetz V. California State Board Of Education [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter Jul 1955

Steinmetz V. California State Board Of Education [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

A public employee was legitimately dismissed from his position as a professor at a state college because he refused to answer whether he was a member of the Communist Party. The court held his choice was to answer the question or lose his job.


Hirschman V. County Of Los Angeles [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter Nov 1952

Hirschman V. County Of Los Angeles [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

County civil service employees were not entitled to a declaration that a county oath requirement was invalid because the field of loyalty oath requirements for all county employees was not preempted by statute until adoption of the Levering Act.


Bisno V. Leonard [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter Oct 1952

Bisno V. Leonard [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

No abstract provided.


Hanchett V. Lehman [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter Oct 1952

Hanchett V. Lehman [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

Denial of writ of mandate to compel a county to reinstate permanent civil service employees in their jobs after they were discharged for refusing to sign an oath and affidavit, stating which political organizations that they belonged to was proper.


Horowitz V. Conlan [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter Oct 1952

Horowitz V. Conlan [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

No abstract provided.


Bowen V. County Of Los Angeles [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter Oct 1952

Bowen V. County Of Los Angeles [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

A former county civil service employee was not entitled to a writ of mandamus to compel the county to reinstate her employment because she refused to execute the loyalty oath that was required of county employees.


Fraser V. Regents Of University Of California [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter Oct 1952

Fraser V. Regents Of University Of California [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

A former university instructor was not entitled to a writ of mandamus to compel the Regents of the University of California to reinstate him because he refused to take an oath of loyalty that was required of teachers as a condition of employment.


Tolman V. Underhill [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter Oct 1952

Tolman V. Underhill [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

In California, university personnel could not have properly been required to execute any other oath or declaration relating to loyalty than that prescribed for all state employees.


Pockman V. Leonard [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter Oct 1952

Pockman V. Leonard [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

College had to pay part, but not all, of professor's salary, which was withheld after he failed to execute oath, because the oath did not violate California's Constitution, but 30 day grace period applied to law, for which he was entitled to payment.