Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Publication
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
The (Hoped For) Shallowness Of Progressive Skepticism Towards Religious Freedom, Nathan B. Oman
The (Hoped For) Shallowness Of Progressive Skepticism Towards Religious Freedom, Nathan B. Oman
Nathan B. Oman
No abstract provided.
The Empirical Irony Of The Conflict Between Antidiscrimination And Religious Freedom, Nathan B. Oman
The Empirical Irony Of The Conflict Between Antidiscrimination And Religious Freedom, Nathan B. Oman
Nathan B. Oman
No abstract provided.
Law, Religious Change, And Samesex Marriage Posted On, Nathan B. Oman
Law, Religious Change, And Samesex Marriage Posted On, Nathan B. Oman
Nathan B. Oman
No abstract provided.
What Can Brown Do For You?: Addressing Mccleskey V. Kemp As A Flawed Standard For Measuring The Constitutionally Significant Risk Of Race Bias
Erwin Chemerinsky
This Essay asserts that in McCleskey v. Kemp, the Supreme Court created a problematic standard for the evidence of race bias necessary to uphold an equal protection claim under the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. First, the Court’s opinion reinforced the cramped understanding that constitutional claims require evidence of not only disparate impact but also discriminatory purpose, producing significant negative consequences for the operation of the U.S. criminal justice system. Second, the Court rejected the Baldus study’s findings of statistically significant correlations between the races of the perpetrators and victims and the imposition of the death …
How The United States Supreme Court Diminished Constitutional Protections Of The Right To Vote And What Congress Can Do About It, Henry Rose
Henry Rose
No abstract provided.