Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Digital Commons Network

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 17 of 17

Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network

The Constitutionality Of The Patient Protection And Affordable Care Act In The Courts Of Appeals, Mel Cousins Nov 2011

The Constitutionality Of The Patient Protection And Affordable Care Act In The Courts Of Appeals, Mel Cousins

Mel Cousins

Having undergone an extensive process of political discussion and debate, the ACA (properly the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act) is now under intensive legal challenge with over 20 different cases from both states and organizations and individuals having been initiated. The challengers argue that the Act lacks a constitutional basis and/or infringes on their constitutional rights. These cases involve a fascinating intersection of legal, political and policy issues and, regardless of the outcome, will have important implications for the future direction of US health care policy. There have now been four decisions of the courts of appeal on the …


Perfectly Legal To Mandate The Purchase Of Insurance, Alan E. Garfield Nov 2011

Perfectly Legal To Mandate The Purchase Of Insurance, Alan E. Garfield

Alan E Garfield

No abstract provided.


Church Autonomy Versus Civil Rights, Alan E. Garfield Oct 2011

Church Autonomy Versus Civil Rights, Alan E. Garfield

Alan E Garfield

No abstract provided.


The Constitution And Economic Policy, Alan E. Garfield Sep 2011

The Constitution And Economic Policy, Alan E. Garfield

Alan E Garfield

No abstract provided.


Due Process And Fundamental Rights, Martin A. Schwartz Jun 2011

Due Process And Fundamental Rights, Martin A. Schwartz

Martin A. Schwartz

No abstract provided.


Jewish Legal Theory And American Constitutional Theory: Some Comparisons And Contrasts, Samuel J. Levine May 2011

Jewish Legal Theory And American Constitutional Theory: Some Comparisons And Contrasts, Samuel J. Levine

Samuel J. Levine

In this article, Levine explores some of the ways in which Jewish law may shed light on issues in American constitutional theory. While acknowledging that there are fundamental differences between a religious legal system and a secular one, he attempts to show that certain conceptual similarities between American law and Jewish law allow for meaningful yet cautious comparison of the two systems. Part I provides a broad historical and analytical overview of interpretation in Jewish law. Part II of the Article offers a specific conceptual framework for comparing Jewish law with American law. Levine considers questions of flexibility in legal …


Why Should A President Have To Be A Natural-Born Citizen, Alan E. Garfield May 2011

Why Should A President Have To Be A Natural-Born Citizen, Alan E. Garfield

Alan E Garfield

No abstract provided.


Constitutional Limitations On Land Use Controls, Environmental Regulations And Governmental Exactions (2011 Edition), Garrett Power May 2011

Constitutional Limitations On Land Use Controls, Environmental Regulations And Governmental Exactions (2011 Edition), Garrett Power

Garrett Power

This electronic book is published in a searchable PDF format as a part of the E-scholarship Repository of the University of Maryland School of Law. It is an “open content” casebook intended for classroom use in courses in Land Use Control, Environmental Law and Constitutional Law. It consists of cases carefully selected from the two hundred years of American constitutional history which address the clash between public sovereignty and private property. It considers both the personal right to liberty and the personal right in property. The text consists of non-copyrighted material and readers are free to use it or re-mix …


Court's Ruling Fiercely Un-Madisonian, Alan E. Garfield Apr 2011

Court's Ruling Fiercely Un-Madisonian, Alan E. Garfield

Alan E Garfield

No abstract provided.


Lee V. Weisman: Whither The Establishment Clause And The Lemon V. Kurtzman Three Pronged Test?, Thomas A. Schweitzer Apr 2011

Lee V. Weisman: Whither The Establishment Clause And The Lemon V. Kurtzman Three Pronged Test?, Thomas A. Schweitzer

Thomas A. Schweitzer

No abstract provided.


Recent Developments At The Juncture Of The Political Question Doctrine And Climate Litigation Law, James R. May Mar 2011

Recent Developments At The Juncture Of The Political Question Doctrine And Climate Litigation Law, James R. May

James R. May

This short essay does three things. First, it provides a primer on the most recent case developments at the juncture of the climate litigation and the political question doctrine. Second, it hazards some discussion about how the Supreme Court might engage the political question issue in Connecticut v. American Electric Power Co., Civ. Action No. 10-174. It ends with some concluding thoughts about the impact that litigation has on climate policy.


Conservative Justices Fail To See Corrupting Influence Of Money, Alan E. Garfield Mar 2011

Conservative Justices Fail To See Corrupting Influence Of Money, Alan E. Garfield

Alan E Garfield

No abstract provided.


Leave Health Care Law's Validity Up To Voters, Alan E. Garfield Feb 2011

Leave Health Care Law's Validity Up To Voters, Alan E. Garfield

Alan E Garfield

No abstract provided.


Honest Debate At Core Of Constitution, Alan E. Garfield Jan 2011

Honest Debate At Core Of Constitution, Alan E. Garfield

Alan E Garfield

No abstract provided.


Thin Line Between Fighting Crime, Respecting Rights, Alan E. Garfield Jan 2011

Thin Line Between Fighting Crime, Respecting Rights, Alan E. Garfield

Alan E Garfield

No abstract provided.


All Things In Proportion? American Rights Doctrine And The Problem Of Balancing, Alec Stone Sweet Dec 2010

All Things In Proportion? American Rights Doctrine And The Problem Of Balancing, Alec Stone Sweet

Alec Stone Sweet

No abstract provided.


Severability Of Statutes, Tom Campbell Dec 2010

Severability Of Statutes, Tom Campbell

Tom Campbell

Courts legislate when they engage in "severability analysis", allowing part of a law to continue in force, after having struck down other parts as unconstitutional. This is flawed for the same reason that the legislative veto and the executive line-item veto are flawed. All involve creating a legislative outcome without the joint approval of both houses and the executive. The practice derives from an analogy to contract enforcement, where a court will try to preserve part of a contract when the rest is unenforceable. However, the analogy is imperfect because Congress and the state legislature remain in a position to …