Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Supreme Court (4)
- Constitutional law (3)
- Federal government (2)
- United States (2)
- Administrative law (1)
-
- Authority (1)
- Authorization for Use of Military Force (1)
- Campaign funds (1)
- Campaign funds--Law and legislation (1)
- Church and state (1)
- Church and state--United States. (1)
- Conflict of laws (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Constitution. 1st Amendment (1)
- Constitution. 6th Amendment (1)
- Criminal procedure--United States. (1)
- Elections (1)
- Executive power (1)
- Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (1)
- Freedom of religion (1)
- Freedom of religion--United States. (1)
- Hearsay evidence (1)
- International Court of Justice (1)
- International law (1)
- Judicial review (1)
- Political action committees (1)
- Presidents (1)
- Teaching (1)
- Ten commandments (1)
- Treaties (1)
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Reflections On The Teaching Of Constitutional Law, William W. Van Alstyne
Reflections On The Teaching Of Constitutional Law, William W. Van Alstyne
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
“Testimonial” And The Formalistic Definition: The Case For An “Accusatorial” Fix, Robert P. Mosteller
“Testimonial” And The Formalistic Definition: The Case For An “Accusatorial” Fix, Robert P. Mosteller
Faculty Scholarship
The definition that the Supreme Court ultimately gives to the concept of testimonial statements will obviously be of critical importance in determining whether the new Confrontation Clause analysis adopted by Crawford affects only a few core statements or applies to a broader group of accusatorial statements knowingly made to government officials and perhaps private individuals at arm's length from the speaker. I contend that the broader definition is more consistent with the anti-inquisitorial roots of the Confrontation Clause when that provision is applied in the modern world. If my sense of the proper scope of the clause is roughly correct, …
Congressional Authorization And The War On Terrorism, Curtis A. Bradley, Jack L. Goldsmith
Congressional Authorization And The War On Terrorism, Curtis A. Bradley, Jack L. Goldsmith
Faculty Scholarship
This Article presents a framework for interpreting Congress's September 18, 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF), the central statutory enactment related to the war on terrorism. Although both constitutional theory and constitutional practice suggest that the validity of presidential wartime actions depends to a significant degree on their relationship to congressional authorization, the meaning and implications of the AUMF have received little attention in the academic debates over the war on terrorism. The framework presented in this Article builds on the analysis in the Supreme Court's plurality opinion in Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, which devoted significant attention to the …
Medellin V. Dretke: Federalism And International Law, Curtis A. Bradley, Lori Fisler Damrosch, Martin Flaherty
Medellin V. Dretke: Federalism And International Law, Curtis A. Bradley, Lori Fisler Damrosch, Martin Flaherty
Faculty Scholarship
This is an edited version of a debate held at Columbia Law School on February 21, 2005.
Just Blowing Smoke? Politics, Doctrine, And The Federalist Revival After Gonzales V. Raich, Ernest A. Young
Just Blowing Smoke? Politics, Doctrine, And The Federalist Revival After Gonzales V. Raich, Ernest A. Young
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Regulating Section 527 Organizations, Guy-Uriel Charles, Gregg D. Polsky
Regulating Section 527 Organizations, Guy-Uriel Charles, Gregg D. Polsky
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Ten Commandments, Nine Judges, And Five Versions Of One Amendment - The First. (“Now What?”), William W. Van Alstyne
Ten Commandments, Nine Judges, And Five Versions Of One Amendment - The First. (“Now What?”), William W. Van Alstyne
Faculty Scholarship
This article explores the variety of opinions expressed by the Justices in the two “Ten Commandments” cases, specifically Justice O’Connor’s dissent and Justice Breyer’s concurrence in Van Orden v. Perry.