Digital Commons Network^™

The Emerging Neoliberal Penality: Rethinking Foucauldian Punishment In A Profit-Driven Carceral System, Kevin Crow

Kevin Crow

How Do Roles Generate Reasons? On The Methods Of Legal Ethics, Stephen Galoob

Stephen Galoob

Debates about legal ethics should be oriented around the generative problem, which asks two fundamental questions. First, how does the lawyer’s role generate normatively compelling reasons for action? Second, what kinds of reasons can this role generate?

Every substantive theory of legal ethics is based on a solution to the generative problem. On the generative problem method, we should evaluate these theories based on their implicit solutions to the generative problem. None of the main theories of legal ethics is based on a solution to the generative problem that is both structurally valid and empirically verified.

The generative problem method …

Bloomin' Buzzin' Confusion: Facts And Meaning In Adjudication And Mediation, Robert Rubinson

Robert Rubinson

Bloomin’ Buzzin’ Confusion: Facts and Meaning In Adjudication and Mediation ABSTRACT Any methodology, model, or cognitive process must exclude more than it includes in order to make sense of experience. To do otherwise would leave only, in the words of William James, a “bloomin’ buzzin’ confusion.” Mediation and adjudication go about the process of developing meaning from circumstance in fundamentally different ways. Rather than focusing on what each process identifies as important, the article takes the opposite perspective and focuses on what each process excludes. In doing so, the article explores how adjudication identifies relevant “facts” through a specific mechanism: …

Bloomin' Buzzin' Confusion: Facts And Meaning In Adjudication And Mediation, Robert Rubinson

Robert Rubinson

Any methodology, model or cognitive process must exclude more than it includes in order to make sense of experience. To do otherwise would leave only, in the words of Williams James, a "bloomin' buzzin' confusion." Mediation and adjudication go about the process of developing meaning from circumstance in fundamentally different ways. Rather than focusing on what each process identifies as important, the article takes the opposite perspective and focuses on what each process excludes. In doing so, the article explores how adjudication identifies relevant "facts" through a specific mechanism: preexisting substantive rules define what matters and procedural rules exclude what …

Science, Public Bioethics, And The Problem Of Integration, Orlando Carter Snead

O. Carter Snead

Public bioethics — the governance of science, medicine, and biotechnology in the name of ethical goods — is an emerging area of American law. The field uniquely combines scientific knowledge, moral reasoning, and prudential judgments about democratic decisionmaking. It has captured the attention of officials in every branch of government, as well as the American public. Public questions (such as those relating to the law of abortion, the federal funding of embryonic stem cell research, and the regulation of end-of-life decisionmaking) continue to roil the public square.

This article examines the question of how scientific methods and principles can and …

Neuroimaging And The "Complexity" Of Capital Punishment, Orlando Carter Snead

O. Carter Snead

The growing use of brain imaging technology to explore the causes of morally, socially, and legally relevant behavior is the subject of much discussion and controversy in both scholarly and popular circles. From the efforts of cognitive neuroscientists in the courtroom and in the public square, the contours of a project to transform capital sentencing both in principle and practice have emerged. In the short term, such scientists seek to intervene in the process of capital sentencing by serving as mitigation experts for defendants, where they invoke neuroimaging research on the roots of criminal violence to support their arguments. Over …