Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Tax (3)
- Gender (2)
- Taxation (2)
- Book Review (1)
- Canada (1)
-
- Charitable Activity (1)
- Coercion (1)
- Competition (1)
- Contracts (1)
- Criminal Law (1)
- Critical tax theory (1)
- Disabling Choice (1)
- Disparate Treatment Law (1)
- Education (1)
- Employment Law (1)
- Environmental Law (1)
- Estates (1)
- Executive Compensation (1)
- Feminism (1)
- Feminist judgments (1)
- Financial Incentives (1)
- Gaming (1)
- Health Law (1)
- Incentive Architecture (1)
- Inequality (1)
- Innovation (1)
- Intellectual Property (1)
- Judges (1)
- Judging (1)
- Legal Scholarship (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Money That Costs Too Much: Regulating Financial Incentives, Kristen Underhill
Money That Costs Too Much: Regulating Financial Incentives, Kristen Underhill
Indiana Law Journal
Money may not corrupt. But should we worry if it corrodes? Legal scholars in a range of fields have expressed concern about “motivational crowding-out,” a process by which offering financial rewards for good behavior may undermine laudable social motivations, like professionalism or civic duty. Disquiet about the motivational impacts of incentives has now extended to health law, employment law, tax, torts, contracts, criminal law, property, and beyond. In some cases, the fear of crowding-out has inspired concrete opposition to innovative policies that marshal incentives to change individual behavior. But to date, our fears about crowding-out have been unfocused and amorphous; …
Identifying Illegal Subsidies, Ruth Mason
Identifying Illegal Subsidies, Ruth Mason
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Critical Tax Project, Feminist Theory, And Rewriting Judicial Opinions, Anthony C. Infanti, Bridget J. Crawford
The Critical Tax Project, Feminist Theory, And Rewriting Judicial Opinions, Anthony C. Infanti, Bridget J. Crawford
Articles
In this essay, the authors discuss the intellectual foundations for their co-edited book, Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Tax Opinions (2017), the first in a series of subject-matter specific volumes published in the U.S. Feminist Judgments Series by Cambridge University Press. Using only the facts and precedents in existence at the time of the original opinion, the contributors to this and other feminist judgments projects around the globe seek to show how application of feminist perspectives could impact, or even change, the holding or reasoning of judicial decisions. Underlying Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Tax Opinions is the belief that the study of taxation …
Current Tax Reading, Robin Boadway, Kim Brooks, Jinyan Li, Alan Macnaughton
Current Tax Reading, Robin Boadway, Kim Brooks, Jinyan Li, Alan Macnaughton
Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
The Canadian Tax Journal publishes research in, and informed comment on, taxation and public finance, with particular relevance to Canada. To this end, the journal invites interested parties to submit manuscripts for possible publication as peer-reviewed articles, and it especially welcomes work that contributes to the analysis, design, and implementation of tax policies.
The Critical Tax Project, Feminist Theory, And Rewriting Judicial Opinions, Bridget J. Crawford
The Critical Tax Project, Feminist Theory, And Rewriting Judicial Opinions, Bridget J. Crawford
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
Introduction to Symposium on Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Tax Opinions.