Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- AI (3)
- Algorithms (2)
- Artificial intelligence (2)
- Algorithmic accountability (1)
- Automated decision-making (1)
-
- Big data (1)
- Biometric systems (1)
- Book review (1)
- CU Law Faculty (1)
- Compliance (1)
- Computer law (1)
- Critical legal studies (1)
- Due process (1)
- EU Artificial Intelligence Act (1)
- Fundamental rights (1)
- GDPR (1)
- Law and Robotics (1)
- Law and Technology (1)
- Machine learning (1)
- Privacy (1)
- Privacy Law (1)
- Risk management (1)
- Robotics (1)
- Technology Law (1)
- Technology law (1)
- Trade barriers (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Technological 'Disruption' Of The Law's Imagined Scene: Some Lessons From Lex Informatica, Margot Kaminski
Technological 'Disruption' Of The Law's Imagined Scene: Some Lessons From Lex Informatica, Margot Kaminski
Publications
Joel Reidenberg in his 1998 Article Lex Informatica observed that technology can be a distinct regulatory force in its own right and claimed that law would arise in response to human needs. Today, law and technology scholarship continues to ask: does technology ever disrupt the law? This Article articulates one particular kind of “legal disruption”: how technology (or really, the social use of technology) can alter the imagined setting around which policy conversations take place—what Jack Balkin and Reva Siegal call the “imagined regulatory scene.” Sociotechnical change can alter the imagined regulatory scene’s architecture, upsetting a policy balance and undermining …
Book Review, Aamir S. Abdullah
The Right To Contest Ai, Margot E. Kaminski, Jennifer M. Urban
The Right To Contest Ai, Margot E. Kaminski, Jennifer M. Urban
Publications
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used to make important decisions, from university admissions selections to loan determinations to the distribution of COVID-19 vaccines. These uses of AI raise a host of concerns about discrimination, accuracy, fairness, and accountability.
In the United States, recent proposals for regulating AI focus largely on ex ante and systemic governance. This Article argues instead—or really, in addition—for an individual right to contest AI decisions, modeled on due process but adapted for the digital age. The European Union, in fact, recognizes such a right, and a growing number of institutions around the world now call for …
Introduction To The Symposium: The Stakes For Critical Legal Theory, Elizabeth S. Anker, Justin Desautels-Stein
Introduction To The Symposium: The Stakes For Critical Legal Theory, Elizabeth S. Anker, Justin Desautels-Stein
University of Colorado Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Law Of Ai, Margot Kaminski