Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Digital Commons Network

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Public Health

PDF

University of Kentucky

2020

Fee-for-service

Articles 1 - 3 of 3

Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network

Rural/Urban Disparities In The Utilization Of Health And Behavioral Assessments/Interventions In The Fee-For-Service Medicare Population, Christian Rhudy, Eugene Shin, Jeffery C. Talbert Jun 2020

Rural/Urban Disparities In The Utilization Of Health And Behavioral Assessments/Interventions In The Fee-For-Service Medicare Population, Christian Rhudy, Eugene Shin, Jeffery C. Talbert

Rural & Underserved Health Research Center Publications

Overview of Key Findings

  • In 2016, rural county residents represented 21.8% of the fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare population, but only 1.6% of rural FFS beneficiaries live in a county with local utilization of Health and Behavioral Assessments and Interventions (HBAI) services.
  • Utilization of HBAI services in 2016 occurred in 19 (9.7%) rural counties and 176 (90.3%) urban counties.
  • Average utilization rates of HBAI services were higher in rural counties than urban counties (0.7% vs. 0.4%).


Rural/Urban Disparities In Utilization Of Diabetes Self-Management Training To The Fee-For-Service Medicare Population, Christian Rhudy, Aric Schadler, Jeffery C. Talbert Jun 2020

Rural/Urban Disparities In Utilization Of Diabetes Self-Management Training To The Fee-For-Service Medicare Population, Christian Rhudy, Aric Schadler, Jeffery C. Talbert

Rural & Underserved Health Research Center Publications

Overview of Key Findings

  • In 2016, rural fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare beneficiaries represented 21.7% of the population diagnosed with diabetes, but only 2.7% of the population utilizing Diabetes Self-Management Training.
  • Utilization of DSMT services in 2016 occurred in 76 rural counties and 309 urban counties.
  • Average utilization rates of DSMT services were greater in rural counties than urban counties (5.5% vs. 2.5%).


Rural/Urban Disparities In Utilization Of Medical Nutrition Therapy To The Fee-For-Service Medicare Population, Christian Rhudy, Eugene Shin, Jeffery C. Talbert Jun 2020

Rural/Urban Disparities In Utilization Of Medical Nutrition Therapy To The Fee-For-Service Medicare Population, Christian Rhudy, Eugene Shin, Jeffery C. Talbert

Rural & Underserved Health Research Center Publications

Overview of Key Findings

  • In 2016, 21.8% of the fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare population resided in a rural county, but only 3.7% of enrollees residing in a county with utilization of Medical Nutrition Therapy (MNT) services were rural county residents.
  • Utilization of MNT services in 2016 occurred in 92 rural counties and 388 urban counties.
  • Average utilization rates of MNT services were greater in rural counties than urban counties (3.1% vs. 1.9%).