Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Buckley Amendment (1)
- CAB (1)
- Casehandling Manual (1)
- Cheek v. City of Charlotte (1)
- Cianciolo v. Members of City Council (1)
-
- Civil Aeronautics Board (1)
- Civil Rights Act (1)
- Colorado Springs Amusements Ltd. v. Rizzo (1)
- Crowley v. Christensen (1)
- Eisenstadt v. Baird (1)
- Ex parte Maki (1)
- FERPA (1)
- FOIA (1)
- Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (1)
- Freedom of Information Act (1)
- Griswold v. Connecticut (1)
- HEW (1)
- Hicks v. Miranda (1)
- Hogge v. Johnson (1)
- Hora v. City and County of San Francisco (1)
- Joseph v. House (1)
- Kisley v. City of Falls Church (1)
- Lancaster v. Municipal Court (1)
- Murphy v. California (1)
- NLRB (1)
- NLRB v. Sears (1)
- National Labor Relations Board (1)
- Reed v. Reed (1)
- Roe v. Wade (1)
- Saxe v. Breier (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Nlrb Investigatory Records: Disclosure Under The Freedom Of Information Act, Louis A. Fuselier, Armin J. Moeller Jr.
Nlrb Investigatory Records: Disclosure Under The Freedom Of Information Act, Louis A. Fuselier, Armin J. Moeller Jr.
University of Richmond Law Review
A fundamental maxim of American political philosophy is the right of each citizen to know what his government is doing. Political leaders have repeatedly assured the American people that government activities are consistent with the ideals of a free and open society. Whatever confidence the American people may have bestowed upon their government as a result of such pronouncements, it was shattered by the revelations of Watergate, and other allegations of illegal activities attributed to several government agencies. Concurrent with these debilitating developments was the less visible bureaucratic obstruction of the Freedom of Information Act of 1966 (FOIA).
Hands Off!! The Validity Of Local Massage Parlor Laws
Hands Off!! The Validity Of Local Massage Parlor Laws
University of Richmond Law Review
Massage parlors are not a recent American phenomenon. They were a pervasive and, to many, a troublesome phenomenon during the "winning of the West."' In 1897, the Supreme Court determined that one advertisement by women inviting men to their "Baths" and "Massage" rooms was too obscene to be printed. In recent years there has been a sudden increase of interest in and concern about massage parlors. This note examines the most prevalent legal problems generated by the regulation of massage parlors: the relationship between the police power and massage parlor establishments, the constitutional concerns of equal protection and substantive due …
The Family Educational Rights And Privacy Act Two Years Later, Katherine Cudlipp
The Family Educational Rights And Privacy Act Two Years Later, Katherine Cudlipp
University of Richmond Law Review
The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974, the so called Buckley Amendment, grants parents the right to inspect all records that schools maintain on their children and to challenge any contents they believe are inaccurate or misleading. The Act also requires that parents consent before information from school records is released to those outside specified educational categories. Once a student reaches eighteen years of age or enters a postsecondary educational institution, he assumes these rights in his parents' stead. The penalty for failure of an educational system or institution to comply with the law is loss of all …