Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Sentencing guidelines (2)
- Aggravation (1)
- Civil society (1)
- Criminal code (1)
- Criminal code drafting (1)
-
- Criminal justice (1)
- Criminal law and procedure (1)
- Criminal offenses (1)
- Desert (1)
- Dignity Revolution (1)
- Enabling legislation (1)
- Gender inequality (1)
- International norms (1)
- Islamic criminal law (1)
- Islamic law (1)
- Israel (1)
- Jasmine Spring (1)
- Judges (1)
- Judicial discretion (1)
- Mitigation (1)
- Muslim (1)
- Participatory drafting (1)
- Penal law (1)
- Political (1)
- Punishment (1)
- Republic of the Maldives (1)
- Sanctions (1)
- Sentencing (1)
- Shari'a (1)
- Social and economic rights (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Women And The Making Of The Tunisian Constitution, Rangita De Silva De Alwis, Anware Mnasri, Estee Ward
Women And The Making Of The Tunisian Constitution, Rangita De Silva De Alwis, Anware Mnasri, Estee Ward
All Faculty Scholarship
This article attempts to glean from field interviews and secondary sources some of the sociopolitical complexities that underlay women’s engagement in Tunisia’s 2011-14 constitution-making process. Elucidating such complexities can provide further insight into how women’s engagement impacted the substance and enforceability of the constitution’s final text. We argue that, in spite of longstanding roadblocks to implement and enforce constitutional guarantees, the greater involvement of Tunisian women in the constitution drafting process did make a difference in the final gender provisions of Tunisia’s constitution. Although not all recommendations were adopted, Tunisian women were able to use an autochthonous process to edify …
Comments On [Israeli] Proposal For Structuring Judicial Discretion In Sentencing, Paul H. Robinson
Comments On [Israeli] Proposal For Structuring Judicial Discretion In Sentencing, Paul H. Robinson
All Faculty Scholarship
In this essay, Professor Robinson supports the current Israeli proposal for structuring judicial discretion in sentencing, in particular its reliance upon desert as the guiding principle for the distribution of punishment, its reliance upon benchmarks, or “starting-points,” to be adjusted in individual cases by reference to articulated mitigating and aggravating circumstances, and the proposal’s suggestion to use of an expert committee to draft the original guidelines.
Final Report Of The Maldivian Penal Law & Sentencing Codification Project: Text Of Draft Code (Volume 1) And Official Commentary (Volume 2), Paul H. Robinson, Criminal Law Research Group -- University Of Pennsylvania
Final Report Of The Maldivian Penal Law & Sentencing Codification Project: Text Of Draft Code (Volume 1) And Official Commentary (Volume 2), Paul H. Robinson, Criminal Law Research Group -- University Of Pennsylvania
All Faculty Scholarship
The United Nations Development Programme and the Government of the Maldives commissioned the drafting of a penal code based upon existing Maldivian law, which meant primarily a codification of Shari'a. This is the Final Report of that codification project. A description of the process that produced this Report and the drafting principles behind it, as well as a discussion of the special challenges of codifying Islamic criminal law, are contained in an article at http://ssrn.com/abstract=941443.