Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Therapeutic jurisprudence (7)
- Psychology (5)
- Appellate court (4)
- Psychological well-being (3)
- Role of courts (3)
-
- Trial court (3)
- Legal process (2)
- Legal reform (2)
- Litigation (2)
- Louisiana (2)
- Psychological consequences (2)
- ATCA (1)
- Abuse of discretion (1)
- Alien Tort Claims Act (1)
- Antitherapeutic (1)
- Bernstein (1)
- Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System v. Southworth (1)
- Branzburg v. Hayes (1)
- Chicago Council of Lawyers v. Bauer (1)
- Clinical training (1)
- Connecticut Magazine v. Monaghan (1)
- Cornell v. Generali (1)
- Court limitation (1)
- Court of appeals (1)
- Court of first instance (1)
- Courtroom technology (1)
- Criminal stigma (1)
- David Wexler (1)
- Dissent opinions (1)
- Dutch law (1)
Articles 1 - 30 of 30
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
"Garbage In, Garbage Out": The Litigation Implosion Over The Unconstitutional Organization And Jurisdiction Of The City Court Of Atlanta, Edward C. Brewer Iii
"Garbage In, Garbage Out": The Litigation Implosion Over The Unconstitutional Organization And Jurisdiction Of The City Court Of Atlanta, Edward C. Brewer Iii
Mercer Law Review
The City Court of Atlanta, the primary traffic court for Atlanta, Georgia, has exercised jurisdiction since 1996 over more than one million traffic violations and, since 1988 and under two statutes, some fifty thousand nontraffic misdemeanors. The City Court's first predecessor, the Traffic Court of Atlanta, adjudicated traffic law violations from 1955 to 1967 and was replaced in 1967 by a second court, also known as the City Court, which existed until 1996. That City Court's jurisdiction was expanded in 1988 to include nontraffic misdemeanors arising from the same occurrence as the traffic violation. In 1996 the City Court was …
A Vision Of The Future Of Appellate Practice And Process, George Nicholson
A Vision Of The Future Of Appellate Practice And Process, George Nicholson
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
Technology is changing appellate practice in two different ways. The first, is increasing efficiency. Technology is also changing the scope and direction of traditional appellate practice and process.
The Effect Of Courtroom Technologies On And In Appellate Proceedings And Courtrooms, Fredric I. Lederer
The Effect Of Courtroom Technologies On And In Appellate Proceedings And Courtrooms, Fredric I. Lederer
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
The information presented to courts has traditionally been written and oral. Many courts are adopting technology into the courtroom. Changing the record from text to multi-media is the most sweeping of these changes.
"The Mis-Characterization Of The Negro": A Race Critique Of The Prior Conviction Impeachment Rule, Montrè D. Carodine
"The Mis-Characterization Of The Negro": A Race Critique Of The Prior Conviction Impeachment Rule, Montrè D. Carodine
Indiana Law Journal
The election of Barack Obama as the nation's first Black President was a watershed moment with respect to race relations in the United States. Obama's election removed what to many seemed a nearly insurmountable racial barrier. Yet as he transitions into his historic role and his family becomes the first Black occupants of the White House, scores of Blacks are housed in jails and prisons across the country. The mass incarceration of Blacks, among other serious issues, demonstrates that race still matters in the United States. As then-presidential candidate Obama acknowledged in the speech that many viewed to be pivotal …
The Inadequacy Of The Massachusetts Voir Dire, Debora A. Cancado
The Inadequacy Of The Massachusetts Voir Dire, Debora A. Cancado
Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy
No abstract provided.
Eroding The Blue Wall Of Silence: The Need For An Internal Affairs Privilege Of Confidentiality, John Joseph Powers Jr.
Eroding The Blue Wall Of Silence: The Need For An Internal Affairs Privilege Of Confidentiality, John Joseph Powers Jr.
Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy
No abstract provided.
Plea Agreements: Progressing The Fight Against Crime Or Bribing Witnesses, Sheila Creaton
Plea Agreements: Progressing The Fight Against Crime Or Bribing Witnesses, Sheila Creaton
Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy
No abstract provided.
Communication With Represented Persons: An Analysis Of The Scope Of Rule 4.2 Of The Massachusetts Rules Of Professional Conduct As It Applies To Corporations And Federal Prosecutors, Ashlie L. Ringel,
Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy
No abstract provided.
The Court's Failure To Recognize Deportation As Punishment: A Critical Analysis Of Judicial Deference, Lisa Mendel
The Court's Failure To Recognize Deportation As Punishment: A Critical Analysis Of Judicial Deference, Lisa Mendel
Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy
No abstract provided.
Standards Of Review: Judicial Review Of Discretionary Decisionmaking, Martha S. Davis
Standards Of Review: Judicial Review Of Discretionary Decisionmaking, Martha S. Davis
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
The applicable standard of review determines how much deference an appellate court gives a lower court’s decision. Discretionary decisions are review under the “abuse of discretion” standard where the process the lower court used to reach its decision is scrutinized. Three scholars attempts to define this standard are first analyzed followed by cases that have molded the standard. Advice to practitioners concludes the article.
Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel, F. Emmit Fitzpatrick, Nialena Caravasos
Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel, F. Emmit Fitzpatrick, Nialena Caravasos
Richmond Journal of Law and the Public Interest
As an accompaniment to the surge of litigation, we have also witnessed an increase in the claims of ineffective representation by counsel. As more and more litigants are called upon to respond to such claims, the appellate courts have been forced to delineate a basic threshold of competence. Not only is the standard by which counsel is deemed effective or ineffective constantly changing, but also decisions of the higher courts have been devoid of a guideline through which future problems may be anticipated. The review of case law below traces the evolution of both state and federal decisions during approximately …
Alternative Liability In Litigation Malpractice Actions: Eradicating The Last Resort Of Scoundrels, Lawrence W. Kessler
Alternative Liability In Litigation Malpractice Actions: Eradicating The Last Resort Of Scoundrels, Lawrence W. Kessler
San Diego Law Review
The legal malpractice tort, however, has managed to withstand the winds of legal change. Particularly crucial has been the refusal to apply alternative causation doctrines. The refusal to apply causation doctrines that have been embraced in other areas has significant social effects. As a result, the consumers of legal services receive less protection from the courts than do the consumers of products or medical services.
Amicus Curiae: Friend Or Foe: The Limits Of Friendship In American Jurisprudence, Michael J. Harris
Amicus Curiae: Friend Or Foe: The Limits Of Friendship In American Jurisprudence, Michael J. Harris
Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy
No abstract provided.
Totality Of The Suspicious Circumstances: Airport Drug Courier Profile Use In Massachusetts Since Commonwealth V. Torres, Mark W. Dunderdale
Totality Of The Suspicious Circumstances: Airport Drug Courier Profile Use In Massachusetts Since Commonwealth V. Torres, Mark W. Dunderdale
Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy
No abstract provided.
Protecting The Poor: The Dangers Of Altering The Contingency Fee System, Kristin A. Porcu
Protecting The Poor: The Dangers Of Altering The Contingency Fee System, Kristin A. Porcu
Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy
No abstract provided.
Leniency For Testimony: Hypocrisy Or Judicial Necessity, Jason C. Moreau
Leniency For Testimony: Hypocrisy Or Judicial Necessity, Jason C. Moreau
Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy
No abstract provided.
Nuremberg In America: Litigating The Holocaust In United States Courts, Michael J. Bazyler
Nuremberg In America: Litigating The Holocaust In United States Courts, Michael J. Bazyler
University of Richmond Law Review
The phrase "opening the floodgates of litigation" connotes a pejorative meaning in American legal argument. Most often, it is used by courts as a reason not to allow a certain case to proceed for fear that it would overburden both courts and society with a new class of lawsuits.
Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel, F. Emmit Fitzpatrick, Nialena Caravasos
Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel, F. Emmit Fitzpatrick, Nialena Caravasos
Richmond Public Interest Law Review
As an accompaniment to the surge of litigation, we have also witnessed an increase in the claims of ineffective representation by counsel. As more and more litigants are called upon to respond to such claims, the appellate courts have been forced to delineate a basic threshold of competence. Not only is the standard by which counsel is deemed effective or ineffective constantly changing, but also decisions of the higher courts have been devoid of a guideline through which future problems may be anticipated. The review of case law below traces the evolution of both state and federal decisions during approximately …
An Examination Of Mandatory Retirement Provisions For Police Officers, Eric Andrew Fox
An Examination Of Mandatory Retirement Provisions For Police Officers, Eric Andrew Fox
Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy
No abstract provided.
Retaliatory Discharge For Attorney-Employees In Private Practice: To Do, Or Not To Do, The Right Thing, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 383 (2000), Terri Martin Kirik
Retaliatory Discharge For Attorney-Employees In Private Practice: To Do, Or Not To Do, The Right Thing, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 383 (2000), Terri Martin Kirik
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Silencing Speech In The Workplace: Re-Examining The Use Of Specific Speech Injunctive Relief For Title Vii Hostile Environment Work Claims, 34 J. Marshall L. Rev. 321 (2000), Sonali Das
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
What Passes For Policy And Proof In First Amendment Litigation?, Rodney A. Smolla
What Passes For Policy And Proof In First Amendment Litigation?, Rodney A. Smolla
University of Richmond Law Review
In this Allen Chair Symposium issue of the University of Richmond Law Review, three outstanding scholars have written provocative pieces on the First Amendment. Professor John Nowak engages in an exercise of constitutional futurism, "'remembering the future" to propose a number of relatively radical alterations of First Amendment doctrine to achieve what he argues should be the appropriate balance between freedom of speech and fair trials in "cyber world." Professor Paul Carrington, arguing that a communitarian right of citizens to self-government is the principal that ought to animate our politics and law, has launched a broadside indictment against contemporary First …
Trial Participants In The Newsgathering Process, C. Thomas Dienes
Trial Participants In The Newsgathering Process, C. Thomas Dienes
University of Richmond Law Review
The 1990s produced a number of sensational criminal and civil trials. The media and public avidly followed the murder trials of O.J. Simpson and the Menendez brothers, the Oklahoma City bombing trials of Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols, and the trial of those charged in the World Trade Center bombing. Civil trials involving products liability, medical malpractice, environmental pollution; the civil trial of O.J. Simpson; Paula Jones's sexual harassment action against President Clinton; and the notorious antitrust case against Microsoft similarly captured the public's attention. Also, as might be expected, trial judges and the legal system generally grappled with questions …
Thoughts On Some Potential Appellate And Trial Court Applications Of Therapeutic Jurisprudence, Steve Leben
Thoughts On Some Potential Appellate And Trial Court Applications Of Therapeutic Jurisprudence, Steve Leben
Seattle University Law Review
To date, the application of therapeutic jurisprudence principles has been concentrated mainly on specialized trial courts: drug treatment courts, domestic violence courts, criminal courts, and juvenile and family courts. Its application to trial courts generally, as well as its application to the appellate courts, remains largely unexplored. This Article considers three areas in which trial and appellate courts may want to consider applying therapeutic jurisprudence.
Therapeutic Jurisprudence In The Appellate Arena: Judicial Notice And The Potential Of The Legislative Fact Remand, A.J. Stephani
Therapeutic Jurisprudence In The Appellate Arena: Judicial Notice And The Potential Of The Legislative Fact Remand, A.J. Stephani
Seattle University Law Review
This Article begins with a modest objective and ends with an ambitious one. First, it asserts that appellate courts are an appropriate forum for considering the therapeutic impact of the law strand of therapeutic jurisprudence (TJ) scholarship. TJ's character as a "field of social inquiry" is especially suited to the appellate courts' task of formulating new rules of law and choosing among competing policy objectives when resolving opposing normative principles.
"Johnny's In The Basement/Mixing Up His Medicine": Therapeutic Jurisprudence And Clinical Teaching, Keri K. Gould, Michael L. Perlin
"Johnny's In The Basement/Mixing Up His Medicine": Therapeutic Jurisprudence And Clinical Teaching, Keri K. Gould, Michael L. Perlin
Seattle University Law Review
Therapeutic jurisprudence (TJ) provides a new and exciting approach to clinical teaching. By incorporating TJ principles in both the classroom and out-of-classroom components of clinic courses, law professors can give students new and important insights into some of the most difficult problems regularly raised in clinical classes and practice settings. This Article will proceed in three sections. The first section briefly provides some background about TJ and how it has been employed to investigate other areas of the law. Then, the Article discusses some of the important new theoretical developments in clinical legal education, mostly from the "critical lawyering" perspective. …
Advocacy Of The Establishment Of Mental Health Specialty Courts In The Provision Of Therapeutic Justice For Mentally Ill Offenders, Leroy L. Kondo
Advocacy Of The Establishment Of Mental Health Specialty Courts In The Provision Of Therapeutic Justice For Mentally Ill Offenders, Leroy L. Kondo
Seattle University Law Review
This Article explores the establishment of mental health courts as a partial solution to the perplexing societal problem that relegates mentally ill offenders to a "revolving door" existence in and out of prisons and jails.This inescapable situation results from a paucity ofeffective humanitarian policies, laws, and procedures for treating such medically disordered defendants. The establishment of mental health specialty courts is investigated as a potential means of addressing the complex legal issues and psycho-sociological problems faced by the judicial system in dealing with mentally ill offenders.
Silencing The Appellant's Voice: The Antitherapeutic Per Curiam Affirmance, Amy D. Ronner, Bruce J. Winick
Silencing The Appellant's Voice: The Antitherapeutic Per Curiam Affirmance, Amy D. Ronner, Bruce J. Winick
Seattle University Law Review
This Article will analyze the antitherapeutic impact of the per curium affirmance (PCA) in two steps. First, delving into the psychology of procedural justice, this Article will explain how litigants value "voice," or the ability to tell their stories, as well as "validation," or the sense that the decisionmaker has heard their words and taken them seriously. Second, this Article, through the use of narrative, will show how a PCA had a negative psychological impact on an actual appellant in a criminal case. The Article will conclude by proposing an alternative to the antitherapeutic PCA.
Noriega V. Hernández Colón: Political Persecution Under Therapeutic Scrutiny, Roberto P. Aponte Toro
Noriega V. Hernández Colón: Political Persecution Under Therapeutic Scrutiny, Roberto P. Aponte Toro
Seattle University Law Review
Therapeutic jurisprudence is a relatively young school of thought. One of its major attractions to the academic community has been its claim that society could use the law, both at the legislative and adjudicatory level, to promote the psychological well-being of those affected by the law. In this commentary, I want to share a little known decision of the Supreme Court of Puerto Rico regarding police persecution of political minorities. It is my contention that looking at this decision through the lens of therapeutic jurisprudence, one may discover a serious effort by the court to heal very divisive wounds on …
The Secret Of The Court In The Netherlands, Niels F. Van Manen
The Secret Of The Court In The Netherlands, Niels F. Van Manen
Seattle University Law Review
The procedural organization of the legal system in the Netherlands is quite different from the North American model. The Dutch legal system forbids the publication of dissenting opinions. There is even a veil of ignorance about unanimity, created by what is "secret of the court": justice is handed out in black and white terms, regardless of the judges' motivations. This might create an image of unity and unanimity, and thus promote the legitimacy of jurisprudence, however, this secret of the court also prevents the effects of therapeutic jurisprudence, since those who have "won," but even more so those who have …