Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Googling - Our Future?, Lawrence W. Onsager
Googling - Our Future?, Lawrence W. Onsager
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Googling - Our Future?, Lawrence W. Onsager
Dlist: Building An International Scholarly Communication Consortium For Library And Information Science, Anita Coleman, Paul Bracke
Dlist: Building An International Scholarly Communication Consortium For Library And Information Science, Anita Coleman, Paul Bracke
Faculty Publications
DLIST is the Digital Library of Information Science and Technology, a repository of electronic resources in the domains of Library and Information Science (LIS) and Information Technology (IT). Initial collection development scope is in Information Literacy and Informetrics. Academics, researchers, and practitioners create a wealth of content that includes published papers, instructional materials, tutorials for software and databases, bibliographies, pathfinders, bibliometric datasets, dissertations and reports. DLIST aims to capture this wealth of information in a library that is openly available for re-use and global dissemination. Open deposit processes where authors retain copyright and facilities for full-text storage in a variety …
Web Citation Availability: Analysis And Implications For Scholarship, Mary Casserly, James Bird
Web Citation Availability: Analysis And Implications For Scholarship, Mary Casserly, James Bird
James E Bird
Five hundred citations to Internet resources from articles published in library and information science journals in 1999 and 2000 were profiled and searched on the Web. The majority contained partial bibliographic information and no date viewed. Most URLs pointed to content pages with “edu” or “org” domains and did not include a tilde. More than half (56.4%) were permanent, 81.4 percent were available on the Web, and searching the Internet Archive increased the availability rate to 89.2 percent. Content, domain, and directory depth were associated with availability. Few of the journals provided instruction on citing digital resources. Eight suggestions for …