Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- APA (1)
- Administrative Procedure Act (1)
- Child support (1)
- Child support obligations (1)
- DACA (1)
-
- DAPA (1)
- Department of Homeland Security (1)
- Double jeopardy (1)
- Election (1)
- Family law (1)
- First amendment (1)
- Gaming law (1)
- Horse betting (1)
- Horse wagering (1)
- IRS (1)
- Immigration (1)
- Marital status (1)
- Marriage bonus (1)
- Marriage penalty (1)
- NRS 200.730 (1)
- New Jersey (1)
- Obama (1)
- Public assistance (1)
- Referendum (1)
- Suspension of obligation (1)
- Taxation (1)
- Voting (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Qualified Residence Interest Deduction: A Win For Unmarried Co-Owners, Christine Manolakas
Qualified Residence Interest Deduction: A Win For Unmarried Co-Owners, Christine Manolakas
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Castaneda V. State Of Nevada, 132 Nev. Adv. Op. 44 (June 16, 2016), Chelsea Finnegan
Castaneda V. State Of Nevada, 132 Nev. Adv. Op. 44 (June 16, 2016), Chelsea Finnegan
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
Appellant was convicted of 15 counts of child pornography under NRS 200.730. Appellant contested 14 of the 15 charges, arguing that his possession of 15 images of child pornography constituted only one violation. The Court agreed and determined that prosecuting each image or depiction of child pornography as a separate charge under NRS 200.730 is not what the legislature intended. The statute should not be read to charge each “possession” as one violation. The Court reversed 14 of the charges.
Valdez V. Aguilar, 132 Nev. Adv. Op. 37 (May 26, 2016), Kory Koerperich
Valdez V. Aguilar, 132 Nev. Adv. Op. 37 (May 26, 2016), Kory Koerperich
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
The Court determined that NRS 425.360(4) does not exempt a noncustodial parent, who receives public assistance, from a court-ordered child support obligation to the custodial parent of their child. NRS 425.360(4) only exempts a parent from a debt for support owed to the Division of Welfare and Supportive Services.
And They're Off! Would Instant Horse Wagering In New Jersey Require Voter Approval?, Jordon Scot Flynn Hollander
And They're Off! Would Instant Horse Wagering In New Jersey Require Voter Approval?, Jordon Scot Flynn Hollander
UNLV Gaming Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Binding The Enforcers: The Administrative Law Struggle Behind Pres. Obama’S Immigration Actions, Michael Kagan
Binding The Enforcers: The Administrative Law Struggle Behind Pres. Obama’S Immigration Actions, Michael Kagan
Scholarly Works
President Obama’s ambitious use of executive discretion in immigration – especially the DACA and DAPA programs – should be understood in context of a struggle within the executive branch between the President and frontline enforcement officers in the Department of Homeland Security who have actively resisted his policy agenda. The so far successful litigation by 26 states to partially halt these programs has focused on this struggle within the executive branch, rather than on the stalemate between the President and Congress over legislative immigration reform. In preliminary rulings, the federal district court and the Court of Appeals have interpreted ambiguous …