Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Stare decisis (2)
- American Journal of Legal History (1)
- American codification (1)
- Chamber of Commerce Arbitration Committee (1)
- Civil code (1)
-
- Civil rights (1)
- Code Napoleon (1)
- Code of procedure (1)
- Common law lawyer (1)
- Horwitz thesis (1)
- International codification (1)
- Justinian (1)
- Law reports digests etc (1)
- Lawyers (1)
- Legal authority (1)
- Legal research (1)
- Legislation (1)
- Reconstruction Era (1)
- Roman law (1)
- SCOTUS (1)
- Supreme Court (1)
- Yale Law Journal (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Sect And Superstition: The Protestant Framework Of American Codification, Kellen R. Funk
Sect And Superstition: The Protestant Framework Of American Codification, Kellen R. Funk
Faculty Scholarship
Elite lawyers who debated codification in the nineteenth-century United States treated codification as inseparable from a liberal Protestant textualism that had taken hold in the early national era. Legislators declared codification to be the necessary final step of the Protestant Reformation and frequently characterized common law lawyers as beholden to ‘superstition’ and ‘priestcraft’. Their opponents denounced the codifiers’ idea that texts alone could adequately convey common meanings and delighted to point out the endlessly fracturing glosses on supposedly ‘clear’ texts that divided the positivists into an ever-increasing number of sects.
Many works have addressed the relationship between populism and positivism …
Cases And Case-Lawyers, Richard A. Danner
Cases And Case-Lawyers, Richard A. Danner
Faculty Scholarship
In the nineteenth century, the term “case-lawyer” was used as a label for lawyers who seemed to care more about locating precedents applicable to their current cases than understanding the principles behind the reported case law. Criticisms of case-lawyers appeared in English journals in the late 1820s, then in the United States, usually from those who believed that every lawyer needed to know and understand the unchanging principles of the common law in order to resolve issues not found in the reported cases. After the Civil War, expressions of concern about caselawyers increased with the significant growth in the amount …
The Unhappy History Of Civil Rights Legislation, Fifty Years Later, Jack M. Beermann
The Unhappy History Of Civil Rights Legislation, Fifty Years Later, Jack M. Beermann
Faculty Scholarship
Seldom, if ever, have the power and the purposes of legislation been rendered so impotent.... All that is left today are afew scattered remnants of a once grandiose scheme to nationalize the fundamental rights of the individual.
These words were written fifty years ago by Eugene Gressman, now William Rand Kenan, Jr. Professor Emeritus, University of North Carolina School of Law, as a description of what the courts, primarily the Supreme Court of the United States, had done with the civil rights legislation passed by Congress in the wake of the Civil War. Professor Gressman's article, The Unhappy History of …
Ignoring History: The Liability Of Ships' Masters, Innkeepers And Stablekeepers Under Roman Law, David S. Bogen
Ignoring History: The Liability Of Ships' Masters, Innkeepers And Stablekeepers Under Roman Law, David S. Bogen
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Commercial Arbitration In The Eighteenth Century: Searching For The Transformation Of American Law, Eben Moglen
Commercial Arbitration In The Eighteenth Century: Searching For The Transformation Of American Law, Eben Moglen
Faculty Scholarship
Some recent writing on the history of American law, notably that of Morton Horwitz, has observed a "transformation" in the early years of the nineteenth century as a new legal culture replaced the pre-commercial regime and altered rules of law in favor of the commercially active founders of industrial capitalism. In the course of this transformation, Horwitz argues, merchants and lawyers identified possible grounds for an "alliance," in which the lawyers gained social status and a monopoly in adjudicative institutions, while the commercial classes gained a system of law which subsidized their interests at the expense of other classes in …