Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- ABA standards (1)
- Bill Piatt (1)
- CLE ethics credit (1)
- Catholic law professors (1)
- Catholic law schools (1)
-
- Dispute resolution (1)
- Distributive bargaining (1)
- Due process (1)
- Ethics (1)
- Faith-based CLE programs (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Integration of faith (1)
- Integrative bargaining (1)
- Labor negotiations (1)
- Legal education (1)
- MCLE (1)
- Rishi Batra (1)
- St. Mary's University School of Law (1)
- St. Mary’s University School of Law (1)
- State Bar of Texas (1)
- Win-lose (1)
- Win-win (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
State Bar Efforts To Deny Accreditation To Faith-Based Cle Ethics Programs Sponsored By Religiously Affiliated Law Schools, Bill Piatt
Faculty Articles
Religiously affiliated law schools focus on the integration of faith in the formation of future attorneys and leaders. Yet our students are only our students for three years. We can extend our influence and continue to provide a faith-based perspective to them and to other attorneys during the thirty, forty, or more years of their careers by offering continuing legal education (CLE) courses, which bring attorneys and judges together to provide a model for incorporating faith and morality into our professional roles. However, CLE programs must receive accreditation by state authorities if participants are to receive credit for them. Recently, …
Using The Terms Integrative And Distributive Bargaining In The Classroom: Time For Change, Rishi Batra
Using The Terms Integrative And Distributive Bargaining In The Classroom: Time For Change, Rishi Batra
Faculty Articles
The terms "integrative bargaining" and "distributive bargaining" have been with us in the dispute resolution literature since at least the 1960s, when A Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiations was first published in 1965 by Richard Walton and Robert McKersie. While the terms were popularized by these two authors, the authors themselves acknowledged the long line of predecessors, including Mary Parker Follett, who led them to promote these categories. Since that time, "integrative" and "distributive" have been with us and have captured the imagination of scholars, trainers, and practitioners while remaining popular in the dispute resolution literature today. Despite the proliferation …