Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Politics (2)
- Religion (2)
- Blue (1)
- Campaign finance (1)
- Campaign finance reform (1)
-
- Campaign finance regulation (1)
- Center (1)
- Commercial speech (1)
- Compensation (1)
- Conservative (1)
- Corporate money (1)
- Corporate speech (1)
- Corporate spending (1)
- Damage (1)
- Democrats (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Founding fathers (1)
- Human rights (1)
- Israeli (1)
- Left (1)
- Liberal (1)
- Liberalism (1)
- Marketplace of ideas (1)
- Metaphor (1)
- Metonymy (1)
- Middle (1)
- Palestinian (1)
- Peace settlement (1)
- Property (1)
- Public Reason (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Review Essay: Religion And Politics 2004-2007, Leslie C. Griffin
Review Essay: Religion And Politics 2004-2007, Leslie C. Griffin
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Restitution As A Remedy For Refugee Property Claims In The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, Michael Kagan
Restitution As A Remedy For Refugee Property Claims In The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, Michael Kagan
Scholarly Works
This Article examines restitution as an autonomous human right for refugees displaced in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and assesses the implications of taking such a rights-based approach. The author concludes that the refugees have a strong legal claim to restitution. In international law, compensation is relevant only when restitution is materially impossible, where property has been damaged or declined in value so that restitution is not a complete remedy for the victim's loss or where a refugee chooses not to seek restitution. Current empirical research about land usage in Israel indicates that a great deal, and possibly the majority, of lost …
Of Metaphor, Metonymy, And Corporate Money: Rhetorical Choices In Supreme Court Decisions On Campaign Finance Regulation, Linda L. Berger
Of Metaphor, Metonymy, And Corporate Money: Rhetorical Choices In Supreme Court Decisions On Campaign Finance Regulation, Linda L. Berger
Scholarly Works
This Article examines the metaphorical and metonymical framing of corporate money in Supreme Court decisions about campaign finance regulation. Metaphorical influences (corporation as a person, spending money as speech, marketplace of ideas as the model for First Amendment analysis) affected early decisions about the regulation of corporate spending in election campaigns. Later, a metonymical move to isolate corporate money and then to focus on its malevolent tendencies displaced the earlier view of corporate money as speech. This movement was best depicted in McConnell v. Federal Election Commission, 540 U.S. 93 (2003), the Supreme Court's 2003 decision on the Bipartisan Campaign …
Political Reason, Leslie C. Griffin