Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional Law (3)
- China (2)
- Administrative Law (1)
- Air and Space Law (1)
- American Federalism (1)
-
- Antitrust (1)
- Civil Rights (1)
- Constitution's Taxing and Spending Clause (1)
- Consumer Protection Law (1)
- Corporate Diversity (1)
- Corporate Law (1)
- Covid-19 (1)
- Cultural Genocide (1)
- Economics (1)
- Estate Planning (1)
- Federal Securities Law (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Human Rights (1)
- Human Rights Law (1)
- Immigration Law (1)
- Internet Law (1)
- Internet Property Rights (1)
- Notarization Laws (1)
- Outer Space Arms Race (1)
- Professor David Skover (1)
- Regulations on Sunscreen (1)
- Social Media Regulation (1)
- Spending Clause (1)
- The Telephone Consumer Protection Act (1)
- Title VII (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
“‘Made In China’ . . . Is A Warning Label”: Is America Doing Enough?, Devin Kathleen Epp
“‘Made In China’ . . . Is A Warning Label”: Is America Doing Enough?, Devin Kathleen Epp
Seattle University Law Review
This Note explores China’s repressive actions against the Uyghur population and calls upon the U.S. to address these human rights violations. Part I discusses the background and human rights violations in Xinjiang, also known as the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (XUAR). Part II addresses U.S. economic regulations and sanctions imposed against actors involved in Xinjiang’s forced labor industry. Part III analyzes previous U.S. strategies and sanction regimes implemented to combat human rights violations in other countries. This Note recommends that the U.S. implement a more robust multilateral framework to combat the Xinjiang cultural genocide and impose secondary sanctions against China …
Madison 2.0—Applying The Constitution’S Taxing And Spending Clause To Revitalize American Federalism, Mohamed Akram Faizer
Madison 2.0—Applying The Constitution’S Taxing And Spending Clause To Revitalize American Federalism, Mohamed Akram Faizer
Seattle University Law Review
This article introduces the proposal entitled Madison 2.0 which calls for an enlightened federal government to enact legislation—using its broad ability to tax and spend for the general welfare—to revitalize, as opposed to undermine, American federalism. Part I discusses American Federalism today and the need for an updated approach. Part II explores the government's dysfunctional response to the Covid-19 pandemic. Part III proposes how to revitalize American federalism through the Spending Clause. Part IV discusses how to claw back funds in situations of state recalcitrance and replacing funds with a basic income. Lastly, this article concludes by explaining why the …