Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (10)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (5)
- American University Washington College of Law (4)
- Fordham Law School (4)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (4)
-
- Columbia Law School (3)
- Seattle University School of Law (3)
- BLR (2)
- George Washington University Law School (2)
- Georgia State University College of Law (2)
- Selected Works (2)
- Southern Methodist University (2)
- University of Colorado Law School (2)
- University of Georgia School of Law (2)
- University of South Carolina (2)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- Georgetown University Law Center (1)
- New York Law School (1)
- Northern Illinois University (1)
- Roger Williams University (1)
- SelectedWorks (1)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (1)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (1)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (1)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (1)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (1)
- University of Richmond (1)
- University of Washington School of Law (1)
- University of the District of Columbia School of Law (1)
- Washington University in St. Louis (1)
- Publication
-
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (10)
- Faculty Scholarship (4)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (3)
- Federal Communications Law Journal (3)
- Fordham Law Review (3)
-
- Scholarly Works (3)
- Seattle University Law Review (3)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law (3)
- ExpressO (2)
- Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters (2)
- GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works (2)
- Georgia State University Law Review (2)
- Publications (2)
- South Carolina Law Review (2)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (2)
- William A. Herbert (2)
- American University Law Review (1)
- Articles (1)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
- Faculty Works (1)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (1)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (1)
- Law Faculty Articles and Essays (1)
- Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Linda L. Berger (1)
- NYLS Law Review (1)
- Northern Illinois University Law Review (1)
- Oklahoma Law Review (1)
- Rod Smolla (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 65
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
An Architecture For Spam Regulation, David Dickinson
An Architecture For Spam Regulation, David Dickinson
Federal Communications Law Journal
Junk email, commonly referred to as "spam," is the current scourge of the Internet. In late 2004, unwanted email messages were being delivered at a rate of 12.4 billion per day. The variety of tools used to combat spam have failed to make a significant impact. Legislative efforts, such as the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003, met with substantial enforcement complications. The communications industry responded with a variety of technical advances, such as filters and blacklists, but those innovations are still unable to reliably distinguish between wanted and unwanted messages. Real coordination between legislative and technical spam control tactics has yet …
"The House Was Quiet And The World Was Calm The Reader Became The Book", Burt Neuborne
"The House Was Quiet And The World Was Calm The Reader Became The Book", Burt Neuborne
Vanderbilt Law Review
Professor Neuborne argues that we err in reading the Bill of Rights "in splendid isolation" as a randomly ordered set of clause-bound norms. Instead, he argues that the disciplined order and placement of the thirty-three ideas in the Bill of Rights, especially the six textual ideas united in the First Amendment, reveals a deep contextual structure imposed by the Founders that sheds important light on the meaning of the constitutional text. He argues that the "vertical" order of the first ten amendments, as well as the "horizontal" order of ideas within each amendment, provides important clues to a judge seeking …
Cross Burning, Hate Speech, And Free Speech In America, Edward J. Eberle
Cross Burning, Hate Speech, And Free Speech In America, Edward J. Eberle
Law Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Policing Of Demonstrations In The Nation's Capital: Legislative And Judicial Corrections Of A Police Department's Misconception Of Mission And Failure Of Leadership, Ralph Temple
University of the District of Columbia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Speech As Conduct: Generally Applicable Laws, Illegal Courses Of Conduct, “Situation-Altering Utterances,” And The Uncharted Zones, Eugene Volokh
Speech As Conduct: Generally Applicable Laws, Illegal Courses Of Conduct, “Situation-Altering Utterances,” And The Uncharted Zones, Eugene Volokh
ExpressO
In many recent free speech controversies -- over crime-facilitating speech, hostile environment harassment, child custody decisions, doctors’ recommending medical marijuana to their patients, pro-jury-nullification advocacy, and more -- defenders of the speech restriction have argued that the speech isn’t really speech, but is instead tantamount to conduct. Sometimes people argue that there’s no First Amendment problem when speech is restricted under a generally applicable law that covers both speech and conduct. Sometimes they argue that speech may be punished if it’s “an integral part of conduct in violation of a valid criminal statute.” Sometimes they argue that the speech should …
Crime-Facilitating Speech, Eugene Volokh
Crime-Facilitating Speech, Eugene Volokh
ExpressO
Many recent free speech controversies -- over Patriot Act subpoenas, contract murder manuals, encryption and decryption algorithms, contributory copyright infringement, publication of abortion providers’ names, discussions of gaps in security systems, certain kinds of invasion of privacy lawsuits, online term paper mills, and more -- turn out to be special cases of a general problem: Should there be a new First Amendment exception for speech that gives criminals information that can help them commit crimes? And, if so, how broad or narrow should this exception be?
Surprisingly, scholars have almost entirely ignored these broad questions, and the Supreme Court has …
Role Of Judges In Secret Judgments, Abner J. Mikva
Role Of Judges In Secret Judgments, Abner J. Mikva
South Carolina Law Review
No abstract provided.
Endorsing Religion: Drug Courts And The 12-Step Recovery Support Program, Emily M. Gallas
Endorsing Religion: Drug Courts And The 12-Step Recovery Support Program, Emily M. Gallas
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Application Of The First Amendment To Violent And Nonviolent Video Games, Anthony Ventry
Application Of The First Amendment To Violent And Nonviolent Video Games, Anthony Ventry
Georgia State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Free Speech In Public Schools: Has The Supreme Court Created A Haven For Viewpoint Discrimination In School-Sponsored Speech?, Denise Daugherty
Free Speech In Public Schools: Has The Supreme Court Created A Haven For Viewpoint Discrimination In School-Sponsored Speech?, Denise Daugherty
Georgia State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Not For Attribution: Government's Interest In Protecting The Integrity Of Its Own Expression, Helen L. Norton
Not For Attribution: Government's Interest In Protecting The Integrity Of Its Own Expression, Helen L. Norton
Faculty Scholarship
Public entities increasingly maintain that the First Amendment permits them to ensure that private speakers’ views are not mistakenly attributed to the government. Consider, for example, Virginia’s efforts to ban the Sons of Confederate Veterans’ display of the Confederate flag logo on state-sponsored specialty license plates. Seeking to remain neutral in the ongoing debate over whether the Confederate flag is a symbol of “hate” or “heritage,” Virginia argued that the state would be wrongly perceived as endorsing the flag if the logo appeared on a state-issued plate adorned by the identifier “VIRGINIA.” The Fourth Circuit was unpersuaded, holding that the …
The Right Of Access: Is There A Better Fit Than The First Amendment?, Amy Jordan
The Right Of Access: Is There A Better Fit Than The First Amendment?, Amy Jordan
Vanderbilt Law Review
James Madison once said, "a popular Government, without popular information, or a means of acquiring it, is but a Prologue to a Farce or Tragedy; or, perhaps both. Knowledge will forever govern ignorance: And a people who mean to be their own Governors, must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives." For almost forty years, the Supreme Court has anchored the press's and public's right of access to government proceedings and information in the language of the First Amendment. Grounding the right of access in the language of the First Amendment is unsatisfactory not only because it goes beyond …
Judicial Campaign Speech Restrictions In Light Of Republican Party Of Minnesota V. White, Julie Schuering Schuetz
Judicial Campaign Speech Restrictions In Light Of Republican Party Of Minnesota V. White, Julie Schuering Schuetz
Northern Illinois University Law Review
In the United States Supreme Court decision Republican Party of Minnesota v. White, a five-to-four majority struck down a judicial campaign speech restriction designed to uphold the impartiality and integrity of the judiciary and left remaining restrictions in serious doubt. This comment examines judicial campaign speech restrictions and suggests, in light of White, alternatives for states with elected judiciaries that wish to maintain the impartiality and integrity of their judiciaries. After exploring the tension between a state's compelling interest in maintaining an impartial judiciary and a judicial candidate's First Amendment rights, one possible alternative for dealing with judicial campaign speech …
Public-Figure Defamation Actions In South Carolina - Courts Stay Mindful Of The Defendant's State Of Mind, Eric G. Zaiser
Public-Figure Defamation Actions In South Carolina - Courts Stay Mindful Of The Defendant's State Of Mind, Eric G. Zaiser
South Carolina Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Speech-Enhancing Effect Of Internet Regulation, Emily Buss
The Speech-Enhancing Effect Of Internet Regulation, Emily Buss
Chicago-Kent Law Review
In this Article, the author suggests that certain speech-reducing regulations will, in fact, be speech-enhancing for children. This is because children are vulnerable to far greater censorship at the hands of their parents than at the hands of Internet regulators. Regulations that inspire parents to relax their grip on their children's access to information are likely to produce significant net speech gains for children. Viewed this way, regulations designed to protect children can be conceived as pitting the speech interests of adults against the speech interests of children. The Article suggests a number of reasons we might value the children's …
When Well-Being Trumps Liberty: Political Theory, Jurisprudence, And Children's Rights, William Galston
When Well-Being Trumps Liberty: Political Theory, Jurisprudence, And Children's Rights, William Galston
Chicago-Kent Law Review
Compared to most adults, children are dependent and vulnerable and therefore require special protection. Efforts to safeguard their well-being often collide with one or more of the liberty guarantees of the First Amendment. Professor Etzioni fears that current jurisprudence has tipped the balance too far towards individual liberty, making it difficult to extend children the legal protection they need. Drawing on a theoretical account of constitutionalism as well as existing case law, the author argues that mainstream jurisprudence is up to the task of balancing the well-being of children against the liberty of adults. The Supreme Court's recent decision in …
On Protecting Children From Speech, Amitai Etzioni
On Protecting Children From Speech, Amitai Etzioni
Chicago-Kent Law Review
Are children entitled to the same First Amendment rights as adults? This Article explores the constitutionality of limiting children's access to objectionable materials assuming that both free speech rights and the protection of children are two core values that, like all other social values, must be balanced. When used to assess specific court cases and public policies, the balancing principle is a helpful guide in determining whether voluntary or incentives-based programs are sufficient to remedy the problems at hand or whether government regulation of free speech is necessary. The Article analyzes five court cases involving Internet filters in libraries, the …
Shielding Children: The European Way, Michael D. Birnhack, Jacob H. Rowbottom
Shielding Children: The European Way, Michael D. Birnhack, Jacob H. Rowbottom
Chicago-Kent Law Review
The Internet crosses physical borders, and carries with it both its promises and its harms to many different countries and societies. These countries thus share the same technology, but they do not necessarily share the same set of values or legal system. This Article compares the legal response in the United States and in Europe to one important issue: the exposure of children to certain materials, which are deemed harmful to them but not harmful to adults.
This US-European comparison, in which the experience in the United Kingdom serves as a leading example, illustrates the traits of various kinds of …
The Need For A Two (Or More) Tiered First Amendment To Provide For The Protection Of Children, Kevin W. Saunders
The Need For A Two (Or More) Tiered First Amendment To Provide For The Protection Of Children, Kevin W. Saunders
Chicago-Kent Law Review
This Article addresses the two sorts of problems raised by Professor Etzioni, while also responding to the earlier articles in this Symposium. With regard to the spillover effect, the author argues that there are ways to limit the effect on adults of restrictions designed to protect children, even on the Internet. Furthermore, some spillover effect is allowed and may leave open the possibility of protecting children from tobacco or alcohol advertisements. The Article also addresses areas in which material has been seen as protected even for children. While agreeing that depictions of violence pose an important problem, the Article also …
Response, Amitai Etzioni
Toward A Constitutional Regulation Of Minors' Access To Harmful Internet Speech, Dawn C. Nunziato
Toward A Constitutional Regulation Of Minors' Access To Harmful Internet Speech, Dawn C. Nunziato
Chicago-Kent Law Review
In this Article, Prof. Nunziato scrutinizes Congress's recent efforts to regulate access to sexually-themed Internet speech. The first such effort, embodied in the Communications Decency Act, failed to take into account the Supreme Court's carefully-honed obscenity and obscenity-for-minors jurisprudence. The second, embodied in the Child Online Protection Act, attended carefully to Supreme Court precedent, but failed to account for the geographic variability in definitions of obscene speech. Finally, the recently-enacted Children's Internet Protection Act apparently remedies the constitutional deficiencies identified in these two prior legislative efforts, but runs the risk of being implemented in a manner that fails to protect …
The Liberal Theory Of Freedom Of Expression For Children, Colin M. Macleod
The Liberal Theory Of Freedom Of Expression For Children, Colin M. Macleod
Chicago-Kent Law Review
This Article develops a liberal theory of freedom of expression which is sensitive to the interests of children as distinct, vulnerable but developing members of society. I argue that children have, in addition to welfare interests, interests in the development and exercise of basic moral powers. In virtue of such interests, children acquire, well before they become adults, nontrivial rights of free expression. Respecting children's rights to free expression entails limits on the prerogatives of parents and others to determine the sorts of cultural materials children should be permitted access. Nonetheless children's rights are importantly different from those of adults. …
Free Speech And Children's Interests, David Archard
Free Speech And Children's Interests, David Archard
Chicago-Kent Law Review
This Article endorses the conclusion of Etzioni's article that the First Amendment right of free speech should not trump the interests of children. However the picture is more complicated once we recognize that parents have a "basic" right to bring up their children as they see fit that may conflict with the state's duty to protect children in its jurisdiction.
Moreover there is an important difference between protecting children now from harms and safeguarding the interests of the adults they will grow into. Society has an interest in protecting children based upon its fundamental interest in ensuring the conditions of …
On Protecting Children—From Censorship: A Reply To Amitai Etzioni, Marjorie Heins
On Protecting Children—From Censorship: A Reply To Amitai Etzioni, Marjorie Heins
Chicago-Kent Law Review
Etzioni's argument for censorship of minors ignores the fundamental problem with Internet filters, misstates the results of media-effects research, and uses emotional terms like "protection" and "harm" to mask moral judgments about what is appropriate for youth.
Given the size and constantly changing character of the Internet, filters necessarily rely on key words and phrases. As a result, thousands of valuable Web pages are mistakenly blocked by filters, even at their narrowest settings. The problem is inherent in the system.
Most media-effects studies do not show a causal link between violent content and violent (or "aggressive") behavior. The studies that …
Rehearsal For Media Regulation: Congress Versus The Telegraph-News Monopoly, 1866-1900, Menahem Blondheim
Rehearsal For Media Regulation: Congress Versus The Telegraph-News Monopoly, 1866-1900, Menahem Blondheim
Federal Communications Law Journal
In this Article, Menahem Blondheim presents a critical historical analysis of the dawn of communications regulation as it began with the evolution of domestic telegraphy and developed into a coherent link between 19th century technological, business, and social developments and twentieth century First Amendment thought. First, the Article examines the political and economic environment which led to the development of national telegraph and news networks, like Western Union and the Associated Press. The Author then proceeds to assess the role of the mid-to-late nineteenth century American legislature, and how the debate over telegraph and wire service regulation realigned the powers …
Legislating The Tower Of Babel: International Restrictions On Internet Content And The Marketplace Of Ideas, Michael F. Sutton
Legislating The Tower Of Babel: International Restrictions On Internet Content And The Marketplace Of Ideas, Michael F. Sutton
Federal Communications Law Journal
The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects the expression of diverse viewpoints in virtually any medium. Nevertheless, the modern novelty of "borderless" communication via the Internet strains our ideal of keeping government out of the business of regulating speech. This Note reveals the conflict between the First Amendment's national protections and the Internet's lack of national boundaries, while also arguing for international intervention for the protection of free speech. This Author articulates the real danger of "watered-down speech" unless both the FCC and the international community provide regulations and harmonized international standards for online content that reflect First Amendment …
Protections For Public Employees Who 'Blow The Whistle" Appear To Be Inadequate, William A. Herbert
Protections For Public Employees Who 'Blow The Whistle" Appear To Be Inadequate, William A. Herbert
William A. Herbert
No abstract provided.
Changing Channels And Bridging Divides: The Failure And Redemption Of American Broadcast Television Regulation, Anthony E. Varona
Changing Channels And Bridging Divides: The Failure And Redemption Of American Broadcast Television Regulation, Anthony E. Varona
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
In Changing Channels and Bridging Divides: The Failure and Redemption of American Broadcast Television Regulation Professor Varona analyzes how the Supreme Court, Congress and the FCC have defined the legal duties of commercial broadcasters throughout the maturation of the television industry. First, he shows how the public trustee doctrine has failed, with broadcasters today airing very little 'public interest' programming. Second, he examines how and why the FCC has failed to effectively elucidate and enforce the public trustee doctrine, focusing on the irreconcilable First Amendment and commercial tensions inherent in the public trustee doctrine since its inception and the 'capture' …
New York Times V. Sullivan: Core Doctrine Likely To Hold, Rodney Smolla
New York Times V. Sullivan: Core Doctrine Likely To Hold, Rodney Smolla
Rod Smolla
No abstract provided.
What Is The Sound Of A Corporation Speaking? How The Cognitive Theory Of Metaphor Can Help Lawyers Shape The Law, Linda L. Berger
What Is The Sound Of A Corporation Speaking? How The Cognitive Theory Of Metaphor Can Help Lawyers Shape The Law, Linda L. Berger
Linda L. Berger
No abstract provided.